The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Online chat and chatbots to enhance mature student engagement in higher education
Open accessAbstract
Mature students transitioning into their first year of higher education face many difficulties that affect their motivation, participation and success. Their feelings of being disconnected from their peers and from their institutions are among the key barriers to the successful completion of their courses. Encouraging online student engagement among mature students to establish social connection with their instructors and peers can reduce their isolation and enhance their ‘sense of belonging’. During the academic year 2020/2021, the Lifelong Learning Centre (LLC) at the University of Leeds in the UK, decided to pilot an online chat platform ‘Differ’ including a chatbot ‘Bo’ after it had seen a decline in the use of programme Facebook groups. To promote student engagement and monitor the Differ online communities, sixteen digital student mentors were recruited and trained. During the pilot, feedback was collected from students and student mentors. A mixed-methods approach was adopted to boost robustness through triangulation. Several forms of data collection methods were used: a mentimeter, an online survey, three focus group sessions and a semi-structured interview. This study sheds light on the different aspects of creating student-led online communities and provides recommendations on how to improve the uptake of students in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 53,488
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1
Prensky, M. (2001) · On the Horizon · doi:10.1108/10748120110424816 · Cited by 11,104
Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/01623737011003255 · Cited by 5,687
Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1989) · Biochemical Education · doi:10.1016/0307-4412(89)90094-0 · Cited by 4,818
Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991) · Perspectives on socially shared cognition. · doi:10.1037/10096-006 · Cited by 4,555
Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. S. (2017) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143 · Cited by 2,745
Tinto, V. (1997) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.1997.11779003 · Cited by 2,202
Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption
Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfw006 · Cited by 1,992
Exploratory Research in the Social Sciences
Stebbins, R. (2001) · doi:10.4135/9781412984249 · Cited by 1,840
Unmasking the Effects of Student Engagement on First-Year College Grades and Persistence
Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.2008.11772116 · Cited by 1,840
Kuh, G. D. (2003) · Change The Magazine of Higher Learning · doi:10.1080/00091380309604090 · Cited by 1,709
What Student Affairs Professionals Need to Know About Student Engagement
Kuh, G. D. (2009) · Journal of college student development · doi:10.1353/csd.0.0099 · Cited by 1,368
Student engagement literature review
Trowler, V. (2010) · Cited by 1,078
Wilcox, P., Winn, S., & Fyvie‐Gauld, M. (2005) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070500340036 · Cited by 1,018
Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement
Chen, P.-S. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.008 · Cited by 785
Andragogy in Action: Applying Modern Principles of Adult Learning
Tough, A. (1985) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.1985.11778742 · Cited by 759
Chatbots: Are they Really Useful?
Shawar, B. A., & Atwell, E. (2007) · LDV-Forum/Journal for language technology and computational linguistics · doi:10.21248/jlcl.22.2007.88 · Cited by 626
Self-citationNew Benchmarks in Higher Education: Student Engagement in Online Learning
Robinson, C. C., & Hullinger, H. (2008) · Journal of Education for Business · doi:10.3200/joeb.84.2.101-109 · Cited by 618
Unleashing the Potential of Chatbots in Education: A State-Of-The-Art Analysis
Winkler, R., & Soellner, M. (2018) · Academy of Management Proceedings · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2018.15903abstract · Cited by 581
Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice
(2019) · Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice · doi:10.33423/jhetp · Cited by 556
Rediscovering the use of chatbots in education: A systematic literature review
Pérez, J. Q., Daradoumis, T., & Puig, J. M. M. (2020) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.22326 · Cited by 483
Roles, Risks, and Benefits of Peer Mentoring Relationships in Higher Education
Colvin, J., & Ashman, M. (2010) · Mentoring & Tutoring Partnership in Learning · doi:10.1080/13611261003678879 · Cited by 470
Breaking the filter bubble: democracy and design
Bozdag, E., & van den Hoven, J. (2015) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-015-9380-y · Cited by 375
Journal of Institutional Research
Idrus, N. (2006) · Cited by 293
Does Involvement Really Matter? Indicators of College Student Success and Satisfaction
Webber, K. L., Krylow, R. B., & Zhang, Q. (2013) · Journal of college student development · doi:10.1353/csd.2013.0090 · Cited by 249
Tang, Y., & Hew, K. F. (2017) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2017.05.001 · Cited by 214
User response to mandatory IT use: a coping theory perspective
Bhattacherjee, A., Davis, C. J., Connolly, A. J., & Hikmet, N. (2017) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/s41303-017-0047-0 · Cited by 189
Thinking Outside the Black-Box: The Case for “Algorithmic Sovereignty” in Social Media
Reviglio, U., & Agosti, C. (2020) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305120915613 · Cited by 172
Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning networks
Nason, M. (2006) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s11134-006-7366-5 · Cited by 163
Cotton, D., Nash, T., & Kneale, P. E. (2017) · European Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1177/1474904116652629 · Cited by 138
Chatbot as an Intelligent Personal Assistant for Mobile Language Learning
Pham, X. L., Phạm, T. H., Nguyen, Q. M., Nguyen, T. H., & Cao, T. T. H. (2018) · International Conference on Education and E-Learning (ICEEL) · doi:10.1145/3291078.3291115 · Cited by 121
Building models explaining student participation behavior in asynchronous online discussion
Goggins, S., & Xing, W. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.002 · Cited by 116
Stigmatised learners: mature-age students negotiating university culture
Mallman, M., & Lee, H. (2014) · British Journal of Sociology of Education · doi:10.1080/01425692.2014.973017 · Cited by 112
Timmis, S. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.026 · Cited by 103
(2014) · Computación y Sistemas · doi:10.13053/cys · Cited by 100
How mature-age students succeed in higher education: implications for institutional support
Heagney, M., & Benson, R. (2017) · Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management · doi:10.1080/1360080x.2017.1300986 · Cited by 97
Ruan, S., Willis, A., Xu, Q., Davis, G. M., Jiang, L., Brunskill, E., & Landay, J. A. (2019) · Proceedings of the Sixth (2019) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale · doi:10.1145/3330430.3333643 · Cited by 81
Technology enhanced language learning: Connecting theory and practice
Saunders, P. T. (2014) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.07.006 · Cited by 80
‘I've had to swallow my pride’: help seeking and self‐esteem
Clegg, S., Bradley, S., & Smith, K. A. (2006) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360600610354 · Cited by 80
Petty, D. (2000) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/s1096-7516(01)00041-0 · Cited by 75
Using chatbots to aid transition
Carayannopoulos, S. (2017) · International Journal of Information and Learning Technology · doi:10.1108/ijilt-10-2017-0097 · Cited by 55
WhatsApp Messaging: Achievements and Success in Academia
Nitza, D., & Yavich, R. (2016) · International Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.5430/ijhe.v5n4p255 · Cited by 55
Homesickness at College: Its Impact on Academic Performance and Retention
Sun, J., Hagedorn, L. S., & Zhang, Y. L. (2016) · Journal of college student development · doi:10.1353/csd.2016.0092 · Cited by 54
Building bridges: higher degree student retention and counselling support
Pearson, M. (2012) · Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management · doi:10.1080/1360080x.2012.662743 · Cited by 50
Isolated learners: young mature-age students, university culture, and desire for academic sociality
Mallman, M., & Lee, H. (2017) · International Journal of Lifelong Education · doi:10.1080/02601370.2017.1302012 · Cited by 38
O’Boyle, N. (2014) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634523.2014.903333 · Cited by 33
Returns to education for those returning to education: evidence from Australia
Chesters, J., & Watson, L. (2013) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.801422 · Cited by 32
Erb, S. E., & Drysdale, M. (2017) · Studies in the Education of Adults · doi:10.1080/02660830.2017.1283754 · Cited by 31
GroupMe: Investigating Use of Mobile Instant Messaging in Higher Education Courses
Gronseth, S. L., & Hebert, W. (2018) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-018-0361-y · Cited by 26
Making the Grade and Staying Engaged
Troisi, J. D. (2014) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1177/0098628314530337 · Cited by 23
Educational Process: International Journal
(2016) · Educational Process International Journal · doi:10.12973/edupij · Cited by 20
University Student Surveys Using Chatbots: Artificial Intelligence Conversational Agents
Abbas, N., Pickard, T., Atwell, E., & Walker, A. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77943-6_10 · Cited by 19
Self-citationUser-guided system development in Interactive Spoken Language Education
Atwell, E., HOWARTH, P., Souter, C., BALDO, P., Bisiani, R., PEZZOTTA, D., Bonaventura, P., Menzel, W., Herron, D., Morton, R. D., et al. (2000) · Natural Language Engineering · doi:10.1017/s1351324900002473 · Cited by 14
Self-citationWeb chatbots: the next generation of speech systems?
Atwell, E. (2005) · White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 4
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Chuang H., 2003, Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 19, 101
- Hobert S., 2019, 40th international conference on information systems, 1, 1
- O’Keeffe P, 2013, College Student Journal, 47, 605
- Panah E., 2020, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, 14, 1198
- Sjöström J., 2018, International conference on information systems education and research, 1
- Studente S., 2020, International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, 14, 768
- UNESCO, 2021, COVID-19: Reopening and reimagining universities, survey on higher education through the UNESCO national commissions
- Van Dijk J, 2020, The digital divide
- Zakos J., 2008, CLIVE—An artificially intelligent chat robot for conversational language practice, Artificial Intelligence: Theories, models and applicationsLecture notes in computer science 5138
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions
(2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29 · Cited by 561
Determinants of Intention to Use ChatGPT for Educational Purposes: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA
Foroughi, B., Senali, M. G., Iranmanesh, M., Khanfar, A. A. A., Ghobakhloo, M., Annamalai, N., & Naghmeh‐Abbaspour, B. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2226495 · Cited by 510
Grájeda, A., Burgos, J., Olivera, P. C., & Sanjinés, A. (2023) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2023.2287917 · Cited by 266
Student Interaction with ChatGPT Can Promote Complex Critical Thinking Skills
Suriano, R., Plebe, A., Acciai, A., & Fabio, R. A. (2025) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102011 · Cited by 208
Yusuf, H., Money, A., & Daylamani-Zad, D. (2025) · Educational technology research and development · doi:10.1007/s11423-025-10447-4 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Abbas, N., Whitfield, J., Atwell, E., Bowman, H., Pickard, T., & Walker, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Leeds (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Atwell, Eric
- Venue
- International Journal of Lifelong Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-05-04
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 308-326
- ISSN
- 0260-1370 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-519X
- OpenAlex
- W4281696081
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 54.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Lifelong Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- work was supported
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Keywords
- adult learners, student engagement, online chat, chatbots, sense of belonging, student isolation, social connectedness, Facebook groups, lifelong learning centers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review