The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does student engagement in self-assessment calibrate their judgement over time?
Open accessAbstract
One of the implicit aims of higher education is to enable students to become better judges of their own work. This paper examines whether students who voluntarily engage in self-assessment improve in their capacity to make those judgements. The study utilises data from a web-based marking system that provides students with the opportunity to assess themselves on each criterion for each assessment task throughout a programme of study. Student marks were compared with those from tutors to plot changes over time. The findings suggest that overall students’ judgements do converge with those of tutors, but that there is considerable variation across achievement levels, with weaker students showing little improvement. Whilst the study is limited by the exigencies of voluntary participation and thus consequential gaps in the data set, it shows how judgement over time can be demonstrated and points to the potential for more systematic interventions to improve students’ judgements. It also illustrates the use of the web-based marking and feedback software (ReView) that has considerable utility in aiding self-assessment research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This points to an improvement in students ' evaluative expertise over time (Sadler 2010) as they related their evaluations to the evaluations of others; they reflected whether their judgements were appropriate or not, looking for ways to improve future feedback content and wondering what they had missed in making their judgements that others had noticed (Boud et al. 2013).”
From Anonymity as an instructional scaffold in peer assessment: its effects on peer feedback quality and evolution in students’ perceptions about peer assessment skills (2018) · cites this paper as Boud et al. 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.363 · Cited by 9,564 · cited 1×
“We assume that the key feature of the development of judgement, like any other kind of expertise, is that it requires consistent engagement over time (e.g. Ericsson, Krampe, and Tesch-Romer 1993).”
BackgroundAssessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152 · cited 1×
“A person who has the capacity to make good judgements about their work will be able to know why and how their work can be improved (Black and Wiliam 1998).”
BackgroundNicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600572090 · Cited by 5,846
Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
Sadler, D. R. (1989) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00117714 · Cited by 4,285
Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design
Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.691462 · Cited by 1,636 · cited 1×
“Such a strategy, if undertaken after the initial set of tutor comments, would open up possibilities for the kinds of dialogic feedback proposed in recent publications (e.g. Carless, Salter, Yang, and Lam 2011; Boud and Molloy 2012).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSustainable Assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society
Boud, D. (2000) · Studies in Continuing Education · doi:10.1080/713695728 · Cited by 1,545
Self-citationThe use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review
Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079912331379935 · Cited by 1,206
Formative Assessment: Revisiting the Territory
Sadler, D. R. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050104 · Cited by 1,107
From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education.
Nicol, D. (2010) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602931003786559 · Cited by 1,060
Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education: Learning for the Longer Term
(2007) · doi:10.4324/9780203964309 · Cited by 1,049
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 220
Learning by coding: A sociocultural approach to teaching web development in higher education
Faraon, M., Rönkkö, K., Wiberg, M., & Ramberg, R. (2019) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-019-10037-x · Cited by 15
The influence of self-assessment practices on online training for investigative interviewing skills
Yan, Z., Brubacher, S. P., Boud, D. J., & Powell, M. B. (2023) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101236 · Cited by 15
Self-citationCai, Y., Ge, Q., & Yang, Y. (2023) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-023-00692-7 · Cited by 12
Olanike S, A., Onyebuchi, C. N., Njideka M, O., Daniel R.E, E., & Temiloluwa O, S. (2023) · International Journal of Social Sciences and Educational Studies · doi:10.23918/ijsses.v10i3p179 · Cited by 9
Bibliometric analysis of assessment and evaluation in higher education: 2012–2023
Sun, W., Ding, Y., Wang, R., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Zhu, B. L., & Liu, Q. (2024) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2024.2351602 · Cited by 9
Self-Assessment Ability of Pre-Service Teachers
Podgoršek, M., & Lipovec, A. (2017) · The New Educational Review · doi:10.15804/tner.2017.48.2.17 · Cited by 9
Marks Should Not Be the Focus of Assessment – But How Can Change Be Achieved?
Thompson, D. G. (2016) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2016.32.9 · Cited by 8
Self-citationYan, Z., & Mendoza, N. B. (2025) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2025.2534134 · Cited by 11
Effective and Adoptable Metacognitive Tools
Chen, J. (2016) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/p.26901 · Cited by 8
Arsenis, P., & Flores, M. (2020) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2020.1798888 · Cited by 8
The Impact of Feedback on Students’ Autonomous ESP Learning Outcomes
Dmitrenko, N. Y., & Budas, I. (2021) · Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala · doi:10.18662/rrem/13.2/424 · Cited by 12
An interdisciplinary perspective: The value that instructors place on giving written feedback
Knight, S. K., Greenberger, S. W., & McNaughton, M. (2018) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787418810127 · Cited by 7
Hatahet, T., Mohamed, A. A. R., Malekigorji, M., & Kerry, E. K. (2021) · Pharmacy · doi:10.3390/pharmacy10010004 · Cited by 7
Towards Sustainable Assessment: ICT as a Facilitator of Self- and Peer Assessment
Gómez, G. R., & Sáiz, M. S. I. (2015) · Innovation, technology and knowledge management · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24657-4_5 · Cited by 7
Complicidad entre Autoevaluación y Aprendizaje. Matices para su Implantación en la Universidad
Salom, M. A. C., & Tena, B. A. (2022) · Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa · doi:10.15366/riee2022.15.1.002 · Cited by 12
Bermingham, A. K., Neville, R. D., & Makopoulou, K. (2020) · Sport Management Education Journal · doi:10.1123/smej.2019-0054 · Cited by 7
Thompson, J. N., Houston, D. J., & Dansie, K. B. (2017) · Australasian Journal of Paramedicine · doi:10.33151/ajp.14.4.543 · Cited by 6
Self-assessment and peer assessment in accounting education: Students and lecturers perceptions
Babu, A. M. S., & Barghathi, Y. (2020) · Corporate Ownership and Control · doi:10.22495/cocv17i4siart12 · Cited by 6
Liu, J. (2021) · Porta Linguarum Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras · doi:10.30827/portalin.v0i36.13897 · Cited by 7
Students’ perceptions of self-assessment and their approaches to learning in university mathematics
Kangaslampi, R., Asikainen, H., & Virtanen, V. (2022) · LUMAT International Journal on Math Science and Technology Education · doi:10.31129/lumat.10.1.1604 · Cited by 9
Fleming, M. L., Vautour, D., McMullen, M., Cofie, N., Dalgarno, N., Phelan, R., & Mizubuti, G. B. (2021) · Canadian Medical Education Journal · doi:10.36834/cmej.70697 · Cited by 7
Online, Interactive Modules Improve Quantitative Skills in Community College Biology Students
Thompson, K. V., Nelson, K. C., SNIEZEK, J. H., & Marbach‐Ad, G. (2023) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-022-10020-1 · Cited by 6
Knaut, J., Altieri, M., Bach, S., Strobl, I., & Dechant-Herrera, K. (2022) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v17i23.36425 · Cited by 5
Student self-assessment data: an instrument for program assessment
Sloan, J. A., & Frank, T. E. (2023) · Intersection A Journal at the Intersection of Assessment and Learning · doi:10.61669/001c.84511 · Cited by 5
Ober, T. M., Hong, M. R., Carter, M. F., Brodersen, A. S., Rebouças-Ju, D., Liu, C., & Cheng, Y. (2022) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2022.2037508 · Cited by 5
Exploring the dynamic self-assessment process of students across different competency groups
Liu, J. (2022) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101215 · Cited by 5
What university students think about assessment: a case study from Italy
Pastore, S., & Pentassuglia, M. (2015) · European Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/21568235.2015.1070277 · Cited by 5
Pinedo, L., Panadero, E., Ruiz, J. F., & García-Pérez, D. (2025) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2025.2565384 · Cited by 5
Beyond Just Metrics: For a Renewed Approach to Assessment in Higher Education
Raffaghelli, J. E., & Grion, V. (2023) · Higher education dynamics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-24193-2_4 · Cited by 4
Lo, K., Osadnik, C. R., Leonard, M., & Maloney, S. R. (2016) · Physiotherapy Theory and Practice · doi:10.3109/09593985.2015.1092622 · Cited by 4
Progressive electronic self-assessment to promote reflective processes of future teachers.
Pérez-Torregrosa, A.-B., & Arrufat, M. J. G. (2021) · Revista Fuentes · doi:10.12795/revistafuentes.2021.15401 · Cited by 4
Herguedas, J. L. A., & Asencio, E. N. (2023) · Journal of Technology and Science Education · doi:10.3926/jotse.2085 · Cited by 4
The impact of sustainable assessment methods on first-year nursing students’ self-directed learning
Mabaso, T., Downing, C., & Kearns, I. J. (2023) · International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ijans.2023.100539 · Cited by 4
Pérez-Torregrosa, A.-B., Romero-López, M.-A., Ibáñez-Cubillas, P., & Gallego-Arrufat, M.-J. (2017) · Revista Practicum · doi:10.24310/revpracticumrep.v2i1.8265 · Cited by 4
Wilson, M. (2018) · Journal of diagnostic medical sonography · doi:10.1177/8756479318799338 · Cited by 4
Merino, C. S. (2019) · ReiDoCrea Revista electrónica de investigación Docencia Creativa · doi:10.30827/digibug.58464 · Cited by 4
Mendoza, N. B., Xiong, Y., & Yan, Z. (2026) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2026.2641521 · Cited by 6
Panadero, E., & Brown, G. (2026) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2026.2706014 · Cited by 3
Enhancing Student Engagement and Self-Evaluation Using Student Response Systems
Lucey, S., McElroy, B., McInally, L., & Supple, B. (2021) · Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice · doi:10.33423/jhetp.v21i12.4702 · Cited by 4
Profiling Self-Assessment in Undergraduate Interpreting Learning: A Longitudinal Cluster Analysis
Liu, J., & Su, W. (2024) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-024-00851-4 · Cited by 3
Lehane, S., & O’Mahony, T. (2024) · European Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/21568235.2024.2402361 · Cited by 3
Støve, M. P. (2020) · Physiotherapy Research International · doi:10.1002/pri.1878 · Cited by 3
Comparative judgement and the hierarchy of students’ choice criteria
Palisse, J., King, D., & MacLean, M. (2021) · International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/0020739x.2021.1962553 · Cited by 3
Adachi, C., Tai, J., & Dawson, P. (2016) · ASCILITE Publications · doi:10.14742/apubs.2016.874 · Cited by 3
Supporting Self-Assessment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Feedback EffectsPreprint
Liebenow, L. W., Schmidt, F. T. C., Meyer, J., Panadero, E., & Fleckenstein, J. (2024) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/k94eq · Cited by 4
Lee, H., & Bosch, N. (2025) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-025-00514-5 · Cited by 2
Becoming an assessment-literate teacher in teacher education
Kainulainen, J., & Tarnanen, M. (2025) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2025.105341 · Cited by 5
How can we help students develop evaluative judgement? A scoping review of pedagogical approaches
Kang, J., Boud, D. J., Tai, J., & Hughes, L. K. (2026) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2026.2672116 · Cited by 2
Self-citationSurgical residents’ approach to training: are elements of deliberate practice observed?
Ferguson, K. N., & Paradis, J. (2022) · MedEdPublish · doi:10.12688/mep.19025.2 · Cited by 2
Freeborn, T. J., Gosa, M. M., McCallum, D. M., & Steele, E. M. (2024) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--41915 · Cited by 2
Rahal, D., Shaw, S. T., Tucker, M. C., & Stigler, J. W. (2024) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-024-09885-4 · Cited by 2
Mind the Gap: Insights into Student Perceptions During Peer Assessment of Writing
Chen, A. T.-Y., Tan, B., & Wang, K. I. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering · doi:10.1109/tale.2018.8615423 · Cited by 2
LEARNER-DRIVEN ORAL ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR ENGLISH PRESENTATION
Idris, M. B., & Raof, A. H. A. (2019) · Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS) · doi:10.24200/jonus.vol4iss1pp365-383 · Cited by 2
Antwertinger, Y., Larkin, I., Lau, E., O’Connor, E. L., & Santos, J. M. S. (2020) · Professional and practice-based learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-48062-2_3 · Cited by 2
UTILIDAD DEL CONTRATO DE APRENDIZAJE EN EL PRÁCTICUM POR COMPETENCIAS
Fernández, J. T., & Gámez, A. N. (2022) · Profesorado Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado · doi:10.30827/profesorado.v26i3.21322 · Cited by 2
The use of quality formative assessment to improve student learning in West Ethiopian universities
Weldmeskel, F. M. (2015) · Unisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa) · Cited by 2
Development of Youth Information Hygiene Skills: The Gap Between the Self-Assessment and Real State
Руденко, Ю. О., Drushlyak, M. G., Naboka, O. H., Proshkin, V., & Семеніхіна, О. В. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-82243-8_5 · Cited by 9
Ten Aspects Concerning Educational Design Within Environmentally Sustainable Design Studios
Wijesooriya, N., Brambilla, A., & Markauskaitė, L. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17094170 · Cited by 1
Investigating How Self-recording and Playback Influence Music Students’ Self-assessment
Wang, Y., Ba, S., & Li, K. Y. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-1525-7_21 · Cited by 3
Panadero, E., & Brown, G. (2026) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2026.2731625 · Cited by 1
Student Performance Improvement from a Student-graded Logbook Exercise
Maughan, M., & Perry, J. (2016) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/p.25912 · Cited by 1
Wood, C., & Jones, G. W. (2020) · Research in Post-Compulsory Education · doi:10.1080/13596748.2020.1846314 · Cited by 1
Raffaghelli, J. E., Grion, V., & Rossi, M. D. (2021) · Qwerty · doi:10.30557/qw000036 · Cited by 1
Student Engagement and Student Outcomes: Key Findings from Based on GA-BP-ANN Approach
Anand, T., Sivapurapu, L., Rani, B. A., Akila, D., Soni, D., & Senthamaraiselvi, S. (2024) · International Conference for Innovation in Technology (INOCON) · doi:10.1109/inocon60754.2024.10512022 · Cited by 1
What is the appropriate methodology for Generation Z (and Generation Alpha) education?
Holubová, R. (2024) · doi:10.24917/9788368020380.5 · Cited by 1
Questions for Assessment: A Guide for Tutors’ Practice and Student Development
McKevitt, C. (2015) · Arrow - TU Dublin (Technological University Dublin) · doi:10.21427/d72m82 · Cited by 1
Mbonigaba, J., & Oumar, S. B. (2015) · International Journal of Educational Sciences · doi:10.1080/09751122.2015.11890297 · Cited by 1
Using rich media to facilitate dialogical feedback processes
Ryan, T., Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. (2017) · Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) · Cited by 1
Evaluating students' self-assessment in large classes
Häsä, J., Rämö, J., & Virtanen, V. (2019) · Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja · Cited by 1
Exams for the Purpose of Meaningful Learning
Remesal, A., Estrada, F. G., & Corrial, C. L. (2022) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-9128-4.ch010 · Cited by 1
Peer assisted learning in undergraduate clinical medical education: a mixed methods study
Tai, J. (2017) · Figshare · doi:10.4225/03/58b3be1c67424 · Cited by 1
Talsma, K. (2017) · UTAS Research Repository · doi:10.25959/23239409 · Cited by 2
Humanities professors' conceptions of assessment in general education
Rohrbacher, C. M. (2015) · Digital Repository Service (Northeastern University) · doi:10.17760/d20198254
The effects of calibration amongst management students in higher education
Okeke-Uzodike, O. E., & Chitakunye, P. (2016) · Africa Education Review · doi:10.1080/18146627.2016.1183991
Use of Student Self-Evaluations to Reinforce the Project Control Cycle
Nobe, M. C., & Valdes-Vasquez, R. (2015) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/p.24981
Bharuthram, S. (2018) · Journal for Language Teaching · doi:10.4314/jlt.v52i1.1
NOVICE EFL TEACHERS’ VIEWS ON PEER ASSESSMENT
Önalan, O. (2018)
Lemos, S. R. (2019) · University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester)
Relationships between educational participants in the context of problem modeling
Fominykh, M. V. (2020) · İlköğretim Online · doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2020.695844
Capability development by educational technology
Gladovic, C. (2021) · Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE) · doi:10.14742/ascilite2021.0119
Student Self-Assessment: Connecticut Music Teachers' Use and Perceptions
Epstein, D. (2019) · American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting (AERA) · doi:10.3102/1430989
Pottorf, O. A., & Ward, J. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2782493/v1
ROLE OF FEEDBACK IN AUTONOMOUS LEARNING OF PROFESSIONALLY ORIENTED ENGLISH COMMUNICATION
Dmitrenko, N. Y., & Budas, I. (2023) · АRS LINGUODIDACTICAE · doi:10.17721/2663-0303.2023.1.03
Integration of Technical Teaching and Assessment Based on the Four E Framework
Wu, T., Chang, M., & Ye, X. (2023) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-6868-5.ch002
Ditoro, R., & Bernstein, J. (2023) · The Journal of Physician Assistant Education · doi:10.1097/jpa.0000000000000520
SpeedStacks Uygulamasında Öz Değerlendirme: Öğrenci Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi
AYDOĞAN, M., & GÜNDÜZ, N. (2023) · Journal of Global Sport and Education Research · doi:10.55142/jogser.1298657
Freeborn, T. J., McCallum, D. M., & Dunlap, S. T. (2024) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--42854
Freeborn, T. J., Gosa, M. M., & McCallum, D. M. (2024) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--42757
Mastnak, A., Mastnak, A., Zuljan, M. V., & Magajna, Z. (2023) · Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis | Studia ad Didacticam Mathematicae Pertinentia · doi:10.24917/20809751.15.3
Krzeczkowska, M., & Augustinovič, A. (2024) · doi:10.24917/9788368020380.6
Development of algorithmic thinking through mathematical tasks
Bezouška, T., Konečná, P., & Žáček, M. (2024) · doi:10.24917/9788368020380.1
Teaching carbohydrates at the secondary school using the TASC method
Šrámova, A., & Hrdlička, J. (2024) · doi:10.24917/9788368020380.11
Teaching the subject Applied Chemistry using flipped classroom method
Cídlová, H., & Horská, J. (2024) · doi:10.24917/9788368020380.2
Dyslexia and Chemistry Teaching
Cídlová, H., Měcháčková, L., & Bayerová, A. (2024) · doi:10.24917/9788368020380.3
Dobečková, M., & Kričfaluši, D. (2024) · doi:10.24917/9788368020380.4
Innovative strategies for the assessment of geology in secondary education
Lešková, A., Andraščíková, I., Mišianiková, A., & Fančovičová, J. (2024) · doi:10.24917/9788368020380.7
Do we need knowledge of chemistry in everyday life?
Nodzyńska, M. (2024) · doi:10.24917/9788368020380.8
Autoevaluación y evaluación de habilidades de investigación en alumnado de psicología
de México, U. N. A., López-Alonso, V. E., Aguilar, X. L., de México, U. N. A., Velázquez, L. E. T., Moreno, A. C., de México, U. N. A., Guerra-García, J., & de México, U. N. A. (2024) · Diálogos sobre educación · doi:10.32870/dse.v0i30.1442
Freeborn, T. J., Dunlap, S. T., & McCallum, D. M. (2024) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--46967
Metadata
- Authors
- Boud, D., Lawson, R., & Thompson, D. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- James Cook University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Boud, David
- Venue
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-02-20
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 941-956
- ISSN
- 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-297X
- OpenAlex
- W2076448853
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 62.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- ResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
- Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
- Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Keywords
- student self-assessment, student feedback, achievement level differences, student self-regulation, higher education assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review