The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital competences for teacher professional development. Systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Over the last years, Information and Communication Technologies have played a substantial role in improving both the quality of life for people. However, their potential in education is still developing. In this regard, this paper provides a systematic review of the literature on digital competencies and teacher professional development from 2008 to 2018. The purpose of this study is identifying research trends and potential directions on this topic for future research. The method followed is based on the PRISMA Statement Guidelines for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis. After applying criteria of inclusion, exclusion and thematic belonging, in Scopus and Wos databases, the sample was constituted in 21 studies. The selected studies emphasise the importance of digital competence as one of the challenges facing teachers today, being mainly qualitative methodology studies. Among the conclusions we highlight that most of the selected studies reveal a lack of teacher training and insufficient ICT training.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Qualitative evaluation and research methods
Ellis, D. (1990) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/0268-4012(90)90041-p · Cited by 17,943
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x · Cited by 12,604
The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis
Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5 · Cited by 5,274
21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries
(2009) · OECD Education Working Papers · doi:10.1787/218525261154 · Cited by 1,549
European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu
(2017) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.2760/178382 · Cited by 1,276
Knoke, D., & Yang, S. (2008) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412985864 · Cited by 1,226
Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2 · Cited by 1,131
Spante, M., Hashemi, S. S., Lundin, M., & Algers, A. (2018) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2018.1519143 · Cited by 832
Cited by
Korzynski, P., Mazurek, G., Krzypkowska, P., & Kurasinski, A. (2023) · Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review · doi:10.15678/eber.2023.110302 · Cited by 235
Teachers’ role in digitalizing education: an umbrella review
Wohlfart, O., & Wagner, I. (2023) · Educational technology research and development · doi:10.1007/s11423-022-10166-0 · Cited by 96
Fütterer, T., Scherer, R., Scheiter, K., Stürmer, K., & Lachner, A. (2023) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104756 · Cited by 70
Critical Immersive-Triggered Literacy as a Key Component for Inclusive Digital Education
Lazou, C., & Tsinakos, A. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13070696 · Cited by 36
Hunt, P., Leijen, Ä., & van der Schaaf, M. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11060278 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & García-Martínez, I.
- Venue
- European Journal of Teacher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-10-08
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 513-531
- ISSN
- 0261-9768 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5928
- OpenAlex
- W3092340577
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 7.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital competences for teacher professional development. Systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02619768.2020.1827389
- The paper
- Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & García-Martínez, I. (2022). Digital competences for teacher professional development. Systematic review. European Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1827389
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
