Cited by 1,549Digital literacy in educationEducational Methods and AnalysisLiteracy, Media, and Education

21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries

Open access
Katerina Ananiadou, Magdalean Claro·2009·OECD Education Working Papers

Abstract

This paper discusses issues related to the teaching and assessment of 21st century skills and competencies in OECD countries drawing on the findings of a questionnaire study and other relevant background material such as white papers or curriculum documents. Although all OECD countries were invited to participate in the questionnaire survey, responses were received from seventeen countries or regions, and the paper focuses primarily on this group. The paper presents a short discussion of the importance and relevance of 21st century skills and competencies in the current policy debate and the definitions and conceptual frameworks that have been used in the literature, and proposes a new three-dimensional framework, consisting of the dimensions of information, communication and ethics and social impact. The findings of the questionnaire survey show that most countries or regions cover 21st century skills and competencies in their regulations, guidelines or recommendations for compulsory education. However, there are few specific definitions of these skills and competencies at national or regional level and virtually no clear formative or summative assessment policies for these skills. The only evaluation regarding their teaching is often left to external inspectors as part of their whole school audits. Similarly there are few teacher training programmes that target the teaching or development of 21st century skills, although there exist several teacher training initiatives that focus on developing teachers’ ICT pedagogical skills, most of them optional. The paper discusses the implications of these findings especially with regard to the particular role of ICT in the development of these skills and competencies, and issues related to assessment practices and teacher training.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1787/218525261154

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Anderson, R. (2008). Implications of the information and knowledge society for education. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education New York: Springer.
  2. Balanskat, A., Blamire, R. & Kefala, S. (2006). The ICT impact report. A review of studies of ICT impact on schools in Europe . Brussels: European Schoolnet/European Commission.
  3. Bonnett, M.R., McFarlane, A.E. & Williams, J. (1999) ICT in Subject Teaching - an opportunity for curriculum renewal? The Curriculum Journal , 10, 3, 345-359.
  4. Cox, M., Abbott, C., Webb, M., Blakeley, B., Beauchamp, T. and Rhodes, V. (2004 ). A review of the research literature relating to ICT and attainment. London: Becta.
  5. Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science , 323(5910), 66-69.
  6. Flynn, J.R. ( 2007) What is Intelligence? Beyond the Flynn Effect . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Kalantzis, M. & Cope, B. (2008) New Learning. Elements of a Science of Education . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Kirriemur, J. & McFarlane, A. (2004). Literature review on games and learning . Futurlab report 8. Available at: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/19/04/53/PDF/kirriemuir-j-2004-r8.pdf
  9. Rychen, D. S. & Hersch, S. L. (Eds) (2003). Key Competencies for a Successful Life and a WellFunctioning Society . Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber.
  10. Sefton-Green, J. (2004). Literature Review in Informal Learning with Technology Outside School. Futurelab, Report 7. Available at: www.futurelab.org.uk/research/lit\_reviews.htm
  11. Squire, K. & Jenkins, H. (2003) Harnessing the Power of Games in Education. Insight ,Vol.3, 5-31

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M.
Affiliations
Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques (FR)
Venue
OECD Education Working Papers
Published
2009-12-18
ISSN
1993-9019 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1893371726
Cited by
1,549
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 138 · 2023: 173 · 2022: 197 · 2021: 216 · 2020: 167 · 2019: 133 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 81 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 23
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • OECD education working papers (publishedVersion)
  • Intellectum (Universidad de La Sabana) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
Keywords
21st century skills, competence, teacher professional development, ICT in education, compulsory education policy, three-dimensional framework, information and communication competence, OECD countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review