Cited by 59Cardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and TrainingPhysical Activity and Health

The Talk Test and its relationship with the ventilatory and lactate thresholds

Quinn, Timothy J., Coons, Benjamin A.·2011·Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract

In this study, we wished to determine the relationship between the Talk Test physiological and perceptual indicators and variables measured at the ventilatory and lactate thresholds, and if the Talk Test indicators were associated with a typical exercise prescription. Fifteen participants (13 males and 2 females; age 18-35 years) underwent a treadmill lactate threshold test followed by a VO2max (maximal oxygen consumption) test in which the ventilatory threshold was determined. On a separate day, a Talk Test was administered in which participants read a passage during exercise and rated speaking comfort: "comfortable" (+Talk Test), "not sure" (+/-Talk Test), or "not able to speak comfortably" (-Talk Test). Exercise prescriptions based on 65% and 80% of heart rate reserve and VO2 reserve were determined. Lactate threshold values were significantly higher than those at the ventilatory threshold (P < 0.05). The heart rate, VO2, and %VO2max recorded at all levels of the Talk Test were significantly higher than similar measurements recorded at the ventilatory threshold (P < 0.05). Lactate threshold measurements were similar to the +Talk Test and +/-Talk Test. Participants were exercising at 64 ± 5% VO2max, 82 ± 7% maximal heart rate, and 12 ± 2% RPE (rating of perceived exertion) at the +Talk Test, and 71 ± 6% VO2max, 90 ± 6% maximal heart rate, and 15 ± 2% RPE at the +/-Talk Test, with all values being within ACSM exercise intensity guidelines. Therefore, the Talk Test can be used in this population to prescribe exercise, and Talk Test data are more strongly related to physiological and perceptual variables corresponding to the lactate threshold than to the ventilatory threshold.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02640414.2011.585165

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Chicharro J., 1997, Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 37, 117
  2. Dehart-Beverley M., 2000, Clinical Exercise Physiology, 2, 34
  3. Siri W. E., 1993, Nutrition, 9, 481

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quinn, T. J., & Coons, B. A.
Affiliations
University of New Hampshire (US)
Corresponding author
Quinn, Timothy J.
Venue
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2011-08
Volume
29
Issue
11
Pages
1175-1182
ISSN
  • 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-447X
OpenAlex
W2154266105
Cited by
59
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
talk test, ventilatory threshold, lactate threshold, exercise prescription, heart rate reserve, rating of perceived exertion, exercise intensity, VO2max
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Exercise Test, Physical Exertion, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Oxygen Consumption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review