Cited by 17Physical Activity and HealthContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Impact of the choice of threshold on physical activity patterns in free living conditions among adolescents measured using a uniaxial accelerometer: The HELENA study

Vanhelst, Jeremy, Béghin, Laurent, Salleron, Julia, Ruiz, Jonathan R., Ortega, Francesco B, Ottevaere, Charlene, Molnar, Denes, Kafatos, Anthony +6 more·2014·Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the choice of threshold on physical activity patterns measured in adolescents under free living conditions (FLC) using a uniaxial accelerometer. The study comprised 2043 adolescents (12.5-17.5 years) participating in the HELENA Study. Participants wore a uniaxial accelerometer for 7 days. The PA patterns were assessed using thresholds determined from six different studies. For each of the thresholds used, the number of adolescents fulfilling the recommendation of 60 min of moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) per day was also calculated. A significant difference was found between thresholds regardless of the activity level: differences of 38%, 207%, 136%, and 2780% for sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous intensity PA, respectively (P < 0.001). Time of MVPA varied between methods from 25.3 to 55.2 min · day(-1). The number of adolescents fulfilling the recommendation varied from 5.9% to 37% according to the thresholds used. The kappa coefficient for concordance in the assessment of the number of adolescents achieving the PA recommendations was generally low. The definition of the threshold for PA intensity may considerably affect the PA patterns in FLC when assessed using a uniaxial accelerometer and the number of participants fulfilling the recommendations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02640414.2013.809473

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vanhelst, J., Béghin, L., Salleron, J., Ruiz, J. R., Ortega, F. B., Ottevaere, C., Molnar, D., Kafatos, A., Manios, Y., Widhalm, K., Casajus, J. A., Mauro, B., SjÖStrÖM, M., & Gottrand, F.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Université Lille Nord de France (FR)
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Harokopio University of Athens (GR)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
Venue
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2013-07-26
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
110-115
ISSN
  • 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-447X
OpenAlex
W2148167748
Cited by
17
References
27
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
physical activity thresholds, adolescents, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, sedentary behavior, light physical activity, physical activity intensity classification, physical activity guidelines, HELENA study, free-living conditions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Physical Exertion, Female, Humans, Male, Reference Values, Exercise, Actigraphy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review