Cited by 1,360Physical Activity and HealthContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Comparison of Accelerometer Cut Points for Predicting Activity Intensity in Youth

TROST, STEWART G., LOPRINZI, PAUL D., MOORE, REBECCA, PFEIFFER, KARIN A.·2011·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The absence of comparative validity studies has prevented researchers from reaching consensus regarding the application of intensity-related accelerometer cut points for children and adolescents. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the classification accuracy of five sets of independently developed ActiGraph cut points using energy expenditure, measured by indirect calorimetry, as a criterion reference standard. METHODS: A total of 206 participants between the ages of 5 and 15 yr completed 12 standardized activity trials. Trials consisted of sedentary activities (lying down, writing, computer game), lifestyle activities (sweeping, laundry, throw and catch, aerobics, basketball), and ambulatory activities (comfortable walk, brisk walk, brisk treadmill walk, running). During each trial, participants wore an ActiGraph GT1M, and V˙O2 was measured breath-by-breath using the Oxycon Mobile portable metabolic system. Physical activity intensity was estimated using five independently developed cut points: Freedson/Trost (FT), Puyau (PU), Treuth (TR), Mattocks (MT), and Evenson (EV). Classification accuracy was evaluated via weighted κ statistics and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC). RESULTS: Across all four intensity levels, the EV (κ=0.68) and FT (κ=0.66) cut points exhibited significantly better agreement than TR (κ=0.62), MT (κ=0.54), and PU (κ=0.36). The EV and FT cut points exhibited significantly better classification accuracy for moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity (ROC-AUC=0.90) than TR, PU, or MT cut points (ROC-AUC=0.77-0.85). Only the EV cut points provided acceptable classification accuracy for all four levels of physical activity intensity and performed well among children of all ages. The widely applied sedentary cut point of 100 counts per minute exhibited excellent classification accuracy (ROC-AUC=0.90). CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of these findings, we recommend that researchers use the EV ActiGraph cut points to estimate time spent in sedentary, light-, moderate-, and vigorous-intensity activity in children and adolescents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/mss.0b013e318206476e

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
TROST, S. G., LOPRINZI, P. D., MOORE, R., & PFEIFFER, K. A.
Affiliations
  • Oregon State University (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2011-07
Volume
43
Issue
7
Pages
1360-1368
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2324723463
Cited by
1,360
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 107 · 2019: 118 · 2018: 124 · 2017: 108 · 2016: 123 · 2015: 121 · 2014: 123 · 2013: 110 · 2012: 53
FWCI
38.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD055400)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
accelerometer cut-points, physical activity intensity, children and adolescents, ActiGraph GT1M, sedentary behavior, energy expenditure, indirect calorimetry, classification accuracy
MeSH terms
Acceleration, Adolescent, Calorimetry, Indirect, Child, Child, Preschool, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Male, Motor Activity, Oxygen Consumption, Sports, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Sedentary Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review