Cited by 115Muscle activation and electromyography studiesLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesSports Performance and Training

Kinematic and EMG activities during front and back squat variations in maximum loads

Yavuz, Hasan Ulas, Erdağ, Deniz, Amca, Arif Mithat, Aritan, Serdar·2015·Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the musculature activity and kinematics of knee and hip joints during front and back squat with maximal loading. Two-dimensional kinematical data were collected and electromyographic activities of vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, rectus femoris, semitendinosus, biceps femoris, gluteus maximus and erector spinae were measured while participants (n = 12, 21.2 ± 1.9 years old) were completing front and back squat exercises with maximum loading. Paired sample t-test was used for comparisons between two techniques. Results showed that the electromyographic activity of vastus medialis was found to be greater in the front squat compared to the back squat during the ascending phase (P < 0.05, d = 0.62; 95% CI, -15.0/-4.17) and the whole manoeuvre (P < 0.05, d = 0.41; 95% CI, -12.8/-0.43), while semitendinosus (P < 0.05, d = -0.79; 95% CI, 0.62/20.59) electromyographic activity was greater in the back squat during the ascending phase. Compared to the front squat version, back squat exhibited significantly greater trunk lean, with no differences occurring in the knee joint kinematics throughout the movement. Results may suggest that the front squat may be preferred to the back squat for knee extensor development and for preventing possible lumbar injuries during maximum loading.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02640414.2014.984240

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gluteus maximus controls hip adduction and internal rotation, motions known to contribute to patellofemoral joint stress and PFP.

    “During the acute phase, gluteus maximus activation should be emphasized as this muscle controls hip adduction and internal rotation, motions known to contribute to patellofemoral joint stress and PFP.43,44”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yavuz, H. U., Erdağ, D., Amca, A. M., & Aritan, S.
Affiliations
  • Near East University (CY)
  • Hacettepe University (TR)
Venue
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2015-01-29
Volume
33
Issue
10
Pages
1058-1066
ISSN
  • 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-447X
OpenAlex
W2041110812
Cited by
115
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
front squat, back squat, squat variations, muscle activation, knee kinematics, hip kinematics, vastus medialis, semitendinosus, gluteus maximus, erector spinae, trunk lean, knee extensors, maximum load
MeSH terms
Biomechanical Phenomena, Electromyography, Hip Joint, Humans, Isometric Contraction, Knee Joint, Male, Weight Lifting, Weight-Bearing, Muscle, Skeletal, Resistance Training, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review