The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A critical review of the development of face recognition: Experience is less important than previously believed
Abstract
Historically, it has been argued that face individuation develops very slowly, not reaching adult levels until adolescence, with experience being the driving force behind this protracted improvement. Here, we challenge this view based on extensive review of behavioural and neural findings. Results demonstrate qualitative presence of all key phenomena related to face individuation (encoding of novel faces, holistic processing effects, face-space effects, face-selective responses in neuroimaging) at the earliest ages tested, typically 3-5 years of age and in many cases even infancy. Results further argue for quantitative maturity by early childhood, based on an increasing number of behavioural studies that have avoided the common methodological problem of restriction of range, as well as event-related potential (ERP), but not functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies. We raise a new possibility that could account for the discrepant fMRI findings-namely, the use of adult-sized head coils on child-sized heads. We review genetic and innate contributions to face individuation (twin studies, neonates, visually deprived monkeys, critical periods, perceptual narrowing). We conclude that the role of experience in the development of the mechanisms of face identification has been overestimated. The emerging picture is that the mechanisms supporting face individuation are mature early, consistent with the social needs of children for reliable person identification in everyday life, and are also driven to an important extent by our evolutionary history.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-11-04302.1997 · Cited by 7,738
Yin, R. K. (1969) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027474 · Cited by 2,624
Daselaar, S. M. (2009) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/neuro.09.013.2009 · Cited by 1,501
Kuhl, P. K., Tsao, F.-M., & Liu, H.-M. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1532872100 · Cited by 1,237
Schultz, R. T. (2005) · International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2004.12.012 · Cited by 1,071
Johnson, M. H. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1766 · Cited by 969
Divide and conquer: A defense of functional localizers
Saxe, R., Brett, M., & Kanwisher, N. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.062 · Cited by 544
Golarai, G., Ghahremani, D. G., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., Reiss, A., Eberhardt, J. L., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Grill-Spector, K. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1865 · Cited by 541
Development of face recognition: A maturational component?
Carey, S., Diamond, R., & Woods, B. (1980) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.16.4.257 · Cited by 417
The emergence of the social brain network: evidence from typical and atypical development
JOHNSON, M. H., GRIFFIN, R., CSIBRA, G., HALIT, H., FARRONI, T., DE HAAN, M., TUCKER, L. A., BARON–COHEN, S., & RICHARDS, J. (2005) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579405050297 · Cited by 369
Cited by
(2016) · doi:10.3389/fpsyg · Cited by 801
Social re-orientation and brain development: An expanded and updated view
Nelson, E. E., Jarcho, J. M., & Guyer, A. E. (2016) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.008 · Cited by 447
Seeing faces is necessary for face-domain formation
Arcaro, M. J., Schade, P. F., Vincent, J. L., Ponce, C. R., & Livingstone, M. S. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4635 · Cited by 308
Repetition Probability Effects Depend on Prior Experiences
Grotheer, M., & Kovács, G. (2014) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5326-13.2014 · Cited by 83
Baker, K. A., Laurence, S., & Mondloch, C. J. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.12.012 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- McKone, E., Crookes, K., Jeffery, L., & Dilks, D. D.
- Venue
- Cognitive Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 174-212
- ISSN
- 0264-3294 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0627
- OpenAlex
- W1988682705
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 9.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A critical review of the development of face recognition: Experience is less important than previously believed. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02643294.2012.660138
- The paper
- McKone, E., Crookes, K., Jeffery, L., & Dilks, D. D. (2012). A critical review of the development of face recognition: Experience is less important than previously believed. Cognitive Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2012.660138
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.