The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visual object processing in optic aphasia: A case of semantic access agnosia
Abstract
A single case study is reported of a patient with a naming disorder specific to visually presented stimuli. The patient was often able to gesture correctly to objects he could not name, and he showed intact access to structural knowledge of objects. Further examination revealed an impairment in accessing semantic knowledge about objects, which was most marked when the patient had to discriminate between objects which were visually as well as semantically similar. It is suggested that the patient's naming deficit is due to an impairment in accessing semantic information from vision, following intact access to stored structural knowledge. Correct gestures may be contingent on access to the system specifying structural knowledge. The data are interpreted in terms of a model of visual object identification in which access to semantic information, from the system specifying structural knowledge, is held to operate in cascade.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
Basic objects in natural categories
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-x · Cited by 5,643
The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method
Sternberg, S. (1969) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(69)90055-9 · Cited by 3,137
On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade.
McClelland, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.86.4.287 · Cited by 1,298
Cited by
Priming and Human Memory Systems
Tulving, E., & Schacter, D. L. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2296719 · Cited by 2,595
Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition
Gauthier, I., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/72140 · Cited by 1,418
Memory and Working-with-Memory: A Component Process Model Based on Modules and Central Systems
Moscovitch, M. (1992) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1992.4.3.257 · Cited by 822
Charting the progression in semantic dementia: Implications for the organisation of semantic memory
Hodges, J. R., Graham, N., & Patterson, K. (1995) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658219508253161 · Cited by 432
SCHACTER, D. L. (1990) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1990.tb48909.x · Cited by 418
Metadata
- Authors
- Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W.
- Venue
- Cognitive Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1987-05
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 131-185
- ISSN
- 0264-3294 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0627
- OpenAlex
- W2161622903
- Cited by
- 449
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visual object processing in optic aphasia: A case of semantic access agnosia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02643298708252038
- The paper
- Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1987). Visual object processing in optic aphasia: A case of semantic access agnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643298708252038
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
