The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
1997 UK Total Diet Study dietary exposures to aluminium, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, selenium, tin and zinc
Abstract
Concentrations of aluminium, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, selenium, tin and zinc were determined in samples from the 1997 UK Total Diet Study and used to estimate dietary exposures of the general UK population. Population average dietary exposures to aluminium (3.4 mg/day), arsenic (0.065 mg/day), cadmium (0.012 mg/day), chromium (0.10 mg/day), copper (1.2 mg/day), mercury (0.003 mg/day), nickel (0.13 mg/day), tin (1.8 mg/day) and zinc (8.4 mg/day) are similar to those from previous UK Total Diet Studies and are below the appropriate PTWIs, PMTDIs and TDIs. Dietary exposure of the UK population (0.026 mg/day) to lead is falling as a result of measures taken to reduce lead contamination of the environment and food and is well below the PTWI. There has been little change in UK estimates of selenium exposure since the 1994 Total Diet Study but current-estimates (0.039 mg/day) are lower than those derived from earlier Total Diet Studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dietary exposures to nitrate in the UK
Ysart, G., Miller, P., Barrett, G., Farrington, D., Lawrance, P., & Harrison, N. (1999) · Food Additives and Contaminants · doi:10.1080/026520399283669 · Cited by 117
Self-citation
Cited by
Current status of cadmium as an environmental health problem
Järup, L., & Åkesson, A. (2009) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2009.04.020 · Cited by 2,355
Human Health Risk Assessment for Aluminium, Aluminium Oxide, and Aluminium Hydroxide
Krewski, D., Yokel, R. A., Nieboer, E., Borchelt, D., Cohen, J., Harry, J., Kacew, S., Lindsay, J., Mahfouz, A. M., & Rondeau, V. (2007) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B · doi:10.1080/10937400701597766 · Cited by 998
Heavy metals in marine fish meat and consumer health: a review
Bosch, A. C., O'Neill, B., Sigge, G. O., Kerwath, S. E., & Hoffman, L. C. (2016) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.7360 · Cited by 615
Arsenic in seaweed—Forms, concentration and dietary exposure
Rose, M., Lewis, J., Langford, N., Baxter, M., Origgi, S., Barber, M., MacBain, H., & Thomas, K. (2007) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2007.01.007 · Cited by 210
Self-citationMoreda-Piñeiro, J., Moreda-Piñeiro, A., Romarís-Hortas, V., Moscoso-Pérez, C., López-Mahía, P., Muniategui-Lorenzo, S., Bermejo-Barrera, P., & Prada-Rodríguez, D. (2011) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2010.09.008 · Cited by 182
Metadata
- Authors
- Ysart, G., Miller, P., Croasdale, M., Crews, H., Robb, P., Baxter, M., De L'Argy, C., & Harrison, N.
- Venue
- Food Additives and Contaminants
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 775-786
- ISSN
- 0265-203X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075097644
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 1997 UK Total Diet Study dietary exposures to aluminium, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, selenium, tin and zinc. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/026520300415327
- The paper
- Ysart, G., Miller, P., Croasdale, M., Crews, H., Robb, P., Baxter, M., De L'Argy, C., & Harrison, N. (2000). 1997 UK Total Diet Study dietary exposures to aluminium, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, selenium, tin and zinc. Food Additives and Contaminants. https://doi.org/10.1080/026520300415327
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.