The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methods for allergen analysis in food: a review
Abstract
Food allergies represent an important health problem in industrialized countries. Undeclared allergens as contaminants in food products pose a major risk for sensitized persons. A proposal to amend the European Food Labelling Directive requires that all ingredients intentionally added to food products will have to be included on the label. Reliable detection and quantification methods for food allergens are necessary to ensure compliance with food labelling and to improve consumer protection. Methods available so far are based on protein or DNA detection. This review presents an up-to-date picture of the characteristics of the major food allergens and collects published methods for the determination of food allergens or the presence of potentially allergenic constituents in food products. A summary of the current availability of commercial allergen detection kits is given. One part of the paper describes various methods that have been generally employed in the detection of allergens in food; their advantages and drawbacks are discussed in brief. The main part of this review, however, focuses on specific food allergens and appropriate methods for their detection in food products. Special emphasis is given to allergenic foods explicitly mentioned in the Amendment to the European Food Labelling Directive that pose a potential risk for allergic individuals, namely celery, cereals containing gluten (including wheat, rye and barley) crustaceans, eggs, fish, peanuts, soybeans, milk and dairy products, mustard, tree-nuts, sesame seeds, and sulphite at concentrations of at least 10 mg kg(-1). Sulphites, however, are not discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Journal of Agricultural Research
(2023) · Journal of Agricultural Research, Pakistan · doi:10.58475/jar · Cited by 2,006
Fatal and Near-Fatal Anaphylactic Reactions to Food in Children and Adolescents
Sampson, H. A., Mendelson, L., & Rosen, J. P. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199208063270603 · Cited by 1,609 · cited 1×
“…than peanut allergy in the food allergic population (Bock and Atkins 1990, Sicherer et al. 2000), however, reactions may occur to very small quantities of soy protein, and anaphylaxis to soybean has been reported (Sampson et al. 1992, Foucard and Malmheden Yman 1999, Sicherer et al. 2000).”
BackgroundFatalities due to anaphylactic reactions to foods
Bock, S. A., Muñoz-Furlong, A., & Sampson, H. A. (2001) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1067/mai.2001.112031 · Cited by 1,566
Food allergy. Part 1: Immunopathogenesis and clinical disorders
Sampson, H. A. (1999) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/s0091-6749(99)70411-2 · Cited by 816
Clinical Aspects of Immunology
Samter, M. (1976) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1976.03260360058035 · Cited by 810
Weedn, V. W. (1999) · American Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1093/ajcp/111.2.278 · Cited by 770
Identification of a Brazil-Nut Allergen in Transgenic Soybeans
Nordlee, J. A., Taylor, S. L., Townsend, J. A., Thomas, L. A., & Bush, R. K. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199603143341103 · Cited by 670
Sicherer, S. H., Muñoz-Furlong, A., Burks, A. W., & Sampson, H. A. (1999) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/s0091-6749(99)70224-1 · Cited by 474
Bock, S. A., & Atkins, F. M. (1990) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80689-4 · Cited by 461
Taylor, S. L., Higley, N. A., & Bush, R. K. (1986) · Advances in Food Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2628(08)60347-x · Cited by 430
Cited by
Determination of pesticide residues in food matrices using the QuEChERS methodology
Wilkowska, A., & Biziuk, M. (2011) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.09.094 · Cited by 627
Food authentication by PCR-based methods
Mafra, I., Ferreira, I. M. P. L. V. O., & Oliveira, M. B. P. P. (2008) · European Food Research and Technology · doi:10.1007/s00217-007-0782-x · Cited by 372
Milk allergens, their characteristics and their detection in food: A review
Monaci, L., Tregoat, V., van Hengel, A. J., & Anklam, E. (2006) · European Food Research and Technology · doi:10.1007/s00217-005-0178-8 · Cited by 259
Self-citationRecent advances in the understanding of egg allergens: basic, industrial, and clinical perspectives
Mine, Y., & Yang, M. (2008) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf8001153 · Cited by 196
Metadata
- Authors
- Poms, R. E., Klein, C. L., & Anklam, E.
- Venue
- Food Additives and Contaminants
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-31
- ISSN
- 0265-203X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001334355
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 108
- FWCI
- 10.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methods for allergen analysis in food: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02652030310001620423
- The paper
- Poms, R. E., Klein, C. L., & Anklam, E. (2004). Methods for allergen analysis in food: a review. Food Additives and Contaminants. https://doi.org/10.1080/02652030310001620423
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.