The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The impact of data selection and fitting on SAR estimation for magnetic nanoparticle heating
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“SAR was then calculated using the time rise method described elsewhere26,52 (see supplementary SAR section, Fig. S19).”
From Physical vitrification and nanowarming at liter-scale CPA volumes: toward organ cryopreservation (2025) · cites this paper as [52]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- 10.1080/02656736.2018.1430867 · DOI
- Ring HL, Bischof JC, Garwood M. The use and safety of iron-oxide nanoparticles in MRI and MFH. In Handbook – RF safety. Shrivastava D, editor. Hoboken, NJ: eMagRes;2019.
- 10.1016/S0304-8853(02)00706-0 · DOI
- 10.1088/0957-4484/20/39/395103 · DOI
- 10.1088/0957-4484/22/34/345101 · DOI
- 10.1117/12.706302 · DOI
- 10.1080/02656736.2017.1365953 · DOI
- 10.1002/mrm.26394 · DOI
- Hoopes PJ, Petryk AP, Gimi B, et al. In Vivo imaging and quantification of iron oxide nanoparticle uptake and biodistribution. Proceedings of SPIE, 2012;8317:83170R.
- 10.1126/science.1261821 · DOI
- 10.1126/scitranslmed.aah4586 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s40883-019-00131-4 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsnano.7b01762 · DOI
- 10.1088/0022-3727/47/49/495003 · DOI
- 10.1088/1361-6463/aa89de · DOI
- 10.1088/1361-6463/ab140c · DOI
- 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.02.063 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-017-07088-w · DOI
- 10.1063/1.3597820 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00866 · DOI
- 10.1002/mrm.25181 · DOI
- 10.1080/02656736.2017.1354403 · DOI
- Ring HL, et al. Ferrozine assay for simple and cheap iron analysis of silica-coated iron oxide nanoparticles. ChemRxiv. 2018.
- Etheridge ML, Hurley KR, Zhang J, et al. Accounting for biological aggregation in heating and imaging of magnetic nanoparticles. Technology (Singap World Sci). 2014;2(3):214–228.
- 10.1063/1.4742918 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.08.034 · DOI
- 10.1088/0957-0233/23/3/035701 · DOI
- 10.1109/TMAG.2012.2224648 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10439-012-0633-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5402/2011/164564 · DOI
- 10.1109/TMAG.2011.2162527 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.10.022 · DOI
- 10.1039/C5CP04539H · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.09.041 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Physical vitrification and nanowarming at liter-scale CPA volumes: toward organ cryopreservation
Gangwar, L., Han, Z., Scheithauer, C., Namsrai, B.-E., Kantesaria, S., Goldstein, R., Etheridge, M. L., Finger, E. B., & Bischof, J. C. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-63483-2 · Cited by 26
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ring, H. L., Sharma, A., Ivkov, R., & Bischof, J. C.
- Affiliations
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University of Minnesota
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
- ORCID
- Ring, Hattie L.
- Venue
- International Journal of Hyperthermia
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-12-15
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 100-107
- ISSN
- 0265-6736
- 1464-5157
- PMC
- PMC7888243
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review