The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robustness of partial least-squares method for estimating latent variable quality structures
Abstract
Latent variable structural models and the partial least-squares (PLS) estimation procedure have found increased interest since being used in the context of customer satisfaction measurement. The well-known property that the estimates of the inner structure model are inconsistent implies biased estimates for finite sample sizes. A simplified version of the structural model that is used for the Swedish Customer Satisfaction Index (SCSI) system has been used to generate simulated data and to study the PLS algorithm in the presence of three inadequacies: (i) skew instead of symmetric distributions for manifest variables; (ii) multi-collinearity within blocks of manifest and between latent variables; and (iii) misspecification of the structural model (omission of regressors). The simulation results show that the PLS method is quite robust against these inadequacies. The bias that is caused by the inconsistency of PLS estimates is substantially increased only for extremely skewed distributions and for the erroneous omission of a highly relevant latent regressor variable. The estimated scores of the latent variables are always in very good agreement with the true values and seem to be unaffected by the inadequacies under investigation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A national customer satisfaction barometer: the Swedish experience
Fornell, C. (1992) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1252129 · Cited by 5,641
Cited by
Pls-Sem: indeed a silver bullet
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011) · Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.2753/mtp1069-6679190202 · Cited by 21,631
Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research
F. Hair Jr, J., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & G. Kuppelwieser, V. (2014) · European Business Review · doi:10.1108/ebr-10-2013-0128 · Cited by 11,728
Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021) · Classroom Companion: Business · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7 · Cited by 10,343
An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6 · Cited by 8,088
Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & van Oppen, C. (2009) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20650284 · Cited by 4,944
An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM
Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J. (2009) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.08.001 · Cited by 2,906
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Thiele, K. O. (2017) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-017-0517-x · Cited by 2,712
Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research
Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Mitchell, R., & Gudergan, S. P. (2020) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2017.1416655 · Cited by 1,943
Chung, S., & Cho, H. (2017) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21001 · Cited by 809
Improving PLS-SEM Use for Business Marketing Research
Guenther, P., Guenther, M., Ringle, C. M., Zaefarian, G., & Cartwright, S. (2023) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.03.010 · Cited by 800
Adopters and non-adopters of e-procurement in Singapore: An empirical study
Teo, T. S. H., Lin, S., & Lai, K.-H. (2009) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2008.11.001 · Cited by 397
Zhao, L., Lu, Y., Wang, B., Chau, P. Y. K., & Zhang, L. (2012) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.02.006 · Cited by 389
dos Santos, P. M., & Cirillo, M. Â. (2023) · Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation · doi:10.1080/03610918.2021.1888122 · Cited by 289
Brill, T. M., Munoz, L., & Miller, R. J. (2019) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2019.1687571 · Cited by 291
Brand Misconduct: Consequences on Consumer–Brand Relationships
Huber, F., Vollhardt, K., Matthes, I., & Vogel, J. (2010) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.10.006 · Cited by 198
Chakraborty, R., Lee, J., Bagchi-Sen, S., Upadhyaya, S., & Raghav Rao, H. (2016) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2015.12.007 · Cited by 165
Partial Least Square Discriminant Analysis for bankruptcy prediction
Serrano-Cinca, C., & Gutiérrez-Nieto, B. (2013) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.11.015 · Cited by 139
Pan, J., Ding, S., Wu, D., Yang, S., & Yang, J. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1550272 · Cited by 130
Nanyang Technological University, Chandra, S., Srivastava, S., HEC School of Management, P., Theng, Y.-L., & Nanyang Technological University (2012) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00310 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Cassel, C., Hackl, P., & Westlund, A. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Statistics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-05
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 435-446
- ISSN
- 0266-4763 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0532
- OpenAlex
- W2036634567
- Cited by
- 715
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
