CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5Behavioral and Psychological StudiesEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Case study evaluation of an intervention planning tool to support emotional well-being and behaviour in schools

Stanbridge, Joanna K., Campbell, Lorraine N.·2016·Educational Psychology in Practice
DOI 10.1080/02667363.2016.1158696
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Questions of how best to support both children’s emotional well-being and behaviour in schools are pervasive. The efficacy of an intervention planning tool to support internalising and externalising emotional needs and promote early intervention was explored in a small-scale case study. Adults were trained in two primary schools to carry out the intervention planning tool which they did with a total of 12 children. The intervention planning tool was based on principles of multi-element plans (MEPS) and target-monitoring and evaluation (TME). Data from scaling (TME), the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, a questionnaire based on the School Children’s Happiness Inventory (SCHI), and interviews with school staff and children were analysed using statistical and thematic analyses. Findings indicated that the intervention planning tool supported positive outcomes overall for the children, and that while some barriers were identified, several unexpected advantages were also revealed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02667363.2016.1158696

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. Allen, G. (2011). Early intervention: The next steps. An independent report to Her Majesty’s Government. London: Cabinet Office.
  2. 10.1080/02667361003768518 · DOI
  3. 10.53841/bpsecp.2005.22.3.6 · DOI
  4. 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-175 · DOI
  5. Board of Education (1927). The education of the adolescent: The Hadow Report. London: Board of Education.
  6. British Psychological Society (BPS); Division of Clinical Psychology (2011). Good practice guidelines on the use of psychological formulation. Leicester: BPS.
  7. 10.1037/0033-2909.84.4.800 · DOI
  8. Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) (2008). Children and young people in mind: The final report of the CAMHS review. London: Department for Children, Schools and Families and Department of Health.
  9. Chisholm, B. (1994). Promoting peer support among teachers. In P. Gray, A. Miller, & J. Noake (Eds.), Challenging behaviour in schools. London: Routledge.
  10. Conroy, M., Brown, W., & Davis, C. (2001). Applying the IDEA disciplinary provisions to preschoolers with challenging behaviours. Beyond Behaviour, 11, 23–26.
  11. 10.1080/0144341900100402 · DOI
  12. Department for Education (DfE) (2014). Mental health and behaviour in schools (DFE-00435-2014). London: DfE.
  13. 10.1111/j.1468-3156.2009.00585.x · DOI
  14. 10.1080/02667360802697605 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/0266736970130206 · DOI
  16. Elton, L. (1989). Discipline in schools. London: HMSO.
  17. 10.1353/etc.0.0043 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s10864-005-0957-0 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1080/13632750300507004 · DOI
  21. Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) (2015). Standards of proficiency: Practitioner psychologists. London: Health and Care Professions Council.
  22. 10.1023/A:1022626023239 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/10983007050070040401 · DOI
  24. Ivens, J. (2006). The School Children’s Happiness Inventory. London: GL Assessment.
  25. 10.1080/02667360701507301 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/0270-4684(82)90003-9 · DOI
  27. Johnstone, L. (2011). Psychological formulation: A radical perspective. London: Middlesex University Research Repository.
  28. 10.4324/9780203087268 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/BF01530764 · DOI
  30. 10.1023/A:1005122814723 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/heapro/17.2.139 · DOI
  32. LaVigna, G., & Willis, T. (1992). A model for multielement support plan planning and outcome measurement. In D. Berkell (Ed.), Autism: Identification, Education, and Support Plan. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  33. 10.1080/0885625970120305 · DOI
  34. 10.1177/1534508408314096 · DOI
  35. 10.53841/bpsecp.2010.27.1.91 · DOI
  36. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  37. 10.1080/0141192990250308 · DOI
  38. 10.1348/0144665042388982 · DOI
  39. 10.1177/10634266040120030401 · DOI
  40. 10.1027/1015-5759/a000034 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/s10964-005-8947-z · DOI
  42. 10.53841/bpsecp.2010.27.1.156 · DOI
  43. Rogers, B. (1990). You know the fair rule: Strategies for making the hard job of discipline in school easier. Harlow: Longman.
  44. Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.
  45. 10.1177/019874290102600407 · DOI
  46. 10.53841/bpsecp.2005.22.3.28 · DOI
  47. Shucksmith, J., Summerbell, C., Jones, S., & Whittaker, V. (2007). Mental wellbeing of children in primary education (targeted/indicated activities). London: National Institute of Clinical Excellence.
  48. Steege, M., & Watson, T. (2009). Conducting school-based functional behavioural assessments: A practitioner’s guide. London: Guildford Press.
  49. Steer, A. (2009). Learning behaviour: Lessons learned, a review of behaviour standards and practices in our schools. Nottingham: DCSF Publications.
  50. Stewart-Evans, C. (1994). The role of non-teaching assistants in school responses to difficult behaviour. In P. Gray, A. Miller, & J. Noakes (Eds.), Challenging behaviour in schools. London: Routledge.
  51. 10.1016/B978-008043349-3/50010-4 · DOI
  52. Taylor, C. (2011). Getting the simple things right: Charlie Taylor’s behaviour checklists. London: DfE Publications.
  53. 10.53841/bpsecp.2010.27.1.129 · DOI
  54. Traxson, D. (1994). Helping children to become more self-directing in their learning. In P. Gray, A. Miller, & J. Noakes (Eds.), Challenging Behaviour in Schools. London: Routledge.
  55. UNICEF. (2007). Child poverty in perspective: An overview of child well-being in rich countries. Innocenti Report Card 7. Florence: Innocenti Research Centre.
  56. US Institute of Education Studies (2008). Reducing problems in the elementary school classroom. Washington, DC: What Works Clearinghouse.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 5

Metadata

Authors
Stanbridge, J. K., & Campbell, L. N.
Affiliations
  • Cambridgeshire County Council (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Stanbridge, Joanna K.
Venue
Educational Psychology in Practice
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2016-05-05
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
262-280
ISSN
  • 0266-7363 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5839
DOI
10.1080/02667363.2016.1158696
OpenAlex
W2498695326
Cited by
5
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Psychology in Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
emotional well-being, school behaviour, internalizing problems, externalizing problems, early intervention, elementary school students, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, school staff

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Case study evaluation of an intervention planning tool to support emotional well-being and behaviour in schools. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02667363.2016.1158696
The paper
Stanbridge, J. K., & Campbell, L. N. (2016). Case study evaluation of an intervention planning tool to support emotional well-being and behaviour in schools. Educational Psychology in Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2016.1158696