Cited by 173Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Early evidence of its reliability and validity in a community sample of Italian children

Riso, Daniela Di, Salcuni, Silvia, Chessa, Daphne, Raudino, Alessandra, Lis, Adriana, Altoè, Gianmarco·2010·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.005

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire scales are well-validated and comparable with the Child Behaviour Check List.

    “It has been suggested that these scales are well-validated (Riso et al., 2010) and are comparable with the Child Behaviour Check List (CBCL), a respected measure used in assessing childhood problems and clinical child psychiatric diagnoses (Goodman et al., 2000; Goodman and Scott, 1999; Stone et al., 2010).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Riso, D. D., Salcuni, S., Chessa, D., Raudino, A., Lis, A., & Altoè, G.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
Riso, Daniela Di
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
49
Issue
6
Pages
570-575
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074528538
Cited by
173
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, psychometric validation, reliability statistics, validity, children, self-report questionnaire, gender differences, internal consistency, psychiatric symptoms, community sample, Italian children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review