Cited by 59Youth Education and Societal DynamicsYouth Substance Use and School AttendanceEducational Outcomes and Influences

Unravelling the NEET phenomenon: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of risk factors for youth not in education, employment, or training

Open access
Rahmani, Hamed, Groot, Wim, Rahmani, Amir Mohammad·2024·International Journal of Adolescence and Youth

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis examines the factors contributing to NEET (Not in Education, Employment, or Training) status among youth. We identify 43 studies that meet our inclusion criteria in Scopus, PsycINFO, ERIC, British Education Index, Social Science Citation Index, Conference Proceedings Index, IEEE Xplore, SpringerLink, and ScienceDirect, covering the period from 2010 to October 2023. We find significant associations between NEET status and various demographic, familial, educational, socio-economic, and health-related factors. Gender-specific disparities and evolving trends within distinct demographic cohorts are revealed. Our findings highlight that NEET is associated with a higher suicide risk (OR = 2.8, 1.8–3.8), criminal behaviour (OR = 2.06, 1.47–2.65), and unemployment experience (OR = 1.98, 0.72–3.25), while higher education levels (OR = 0.81, 0.67–0.95) act as a protective factor. These findings underscore the urgent need for comprehensive interventions tailored to the challenges faced by NEET youth. Future research should explore these relationships further to inform policy and practice effectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02673843.2024.2331576

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experiences of loneliness and social isolation in early adolescence were independently and robustly associated with reduced socioeconomic outcomes in young adulthood, with social isolation associated with later unemployment in a magnitude similar to established risk factors including childhood socioeconomic disadvantage and mental health difficulties.

    “Experiences of loneliness and social isolation in early adolescence were independently and robustly associated with reduced socioeconomic outcomes in young adulthood, with social isolation associated with later unemployment in a magnitude similar to established risk factors including childhood socioeconomic disadvantage and mental health difficulties (Rahmani et al., 2024;Veldman, van Zon & Bültm”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rahmani, H., Groot, W., & Rahmani, A. M.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Rahmani, Hamed
Venue
International Journal of Adolescence and Youth
Published
2024-03-24
Volume
29
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0267-3843 (ISSN-L)
  • 2164-4527
OpenAlex
W4393131200
Cited by
59
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 6
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Adolescence and Youth (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
No funds
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
Keywords
NEET youth, not in education, employment or training, risk factors, suicide risk, criminal behavior, unemployment, educational attainment, gender disparities, socioeconomic factors, family factors, health factors, youth intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review