Cited by 237Philosophy and History of SciencePhilosophy, Science, and HistoryPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

Activities and Causation: The Metaphysics and Epistemology of Mechanisms

Machamer, Peter·2004·International Studies in the Philosophy of Science

Abstract

This article deals with mechanisms conceived as composed of entities and activities. In response to many perplexities about the nature of activities, a number of arguments are developed concerning their epistemic and ontological status. Some questions concerning the relations between cause and causal explanation and mechanisms are also addressed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02698590412331289242

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Machamer, P.
Corresponding author
Machamer, Peter
Venue
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science
Published
2004-03
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
27-39
ISSN
  • 0269-8595 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9281
OpenAlex
W2093918078
Cited by
237
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 14
FWCI
12.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
mechanisms, activity, causality, causal explanation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review