The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A cognitive-emotional model of NSSI: using emotion regulation and cognitive processes to explain why people self-injure
Abstract
Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a complex behaviour, routinely engaged for emotion regulatory purposes. As such, a number of theoretical accounts regarding the aetiology and maintenance of NSSI are grounded in models of emotion regulation; the role that cognition plays in the behaviour is less well known. In this paper, we summarise four models of emotion regulation that have repeatedly been related to NSSI and identify the core components across them. We then draw on social cognitive theory to unite models of cognition and models of emotion in developing a new cognitive-emotional model of NSSI. Our model articulates how emotion regulation and cognition can work in concert to govern NSSI, and offers several new research questions that can be addressed within this framework.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
American Psychiatric Association (2013) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 · Cited by 116,369
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
Self-efficacy: the exercise of control
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-1826 · Cited by 24,281
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed.
Carter, M. J. (2014) · Therapeutic Recreation Journal · Cited by 15,154
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348 · Cited by 11,929 · cited 1×
“The popular Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (Gross & John, 2003) was designed to assess cognitive change (operationalised as cognitive reappraisal) and response modulation (operationalised as expressive suppression), scales which have repeatedly been linked to NSSI.”
BackgroundThe emerging field of emotion regulation: an integrative review
Gross, J. J. (1998) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271 · Cited by 9,916
Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1023/b:joba.0000007455.08539.94 · Cited by 8,942 · cited 3×
“If the emotion cannot be avoided, limited access to emotion regulation strategies (cf. Gratz & Roemer, 2004) becomes paramount in increasing risk of NSSI.”
BackgroundInfluentialHuman agency in social cognitive theory.
Bandura, A. (1989) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.44.9.1175 · Cited by 8,263
(1975) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,245
Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms.
Rutter, M. (1987) · American Journal of Orthopsychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1939-0025.1987.tb03541.x · Cited by 5,831
Cited by
Susi, K., Glover‐Ford, F., Stewart, A., Knowles Bevis, R., & Hawton, K. (2023) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13754 · Cited by 61
Czyz, E. K., Glenn, C. R., Arango, A., Koo, H. J., & King, C. A. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.05.104 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Hasking, P., Whitlock, J., Voon, D., & Rose, A.
- Venue
- Cognition and Emotion
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-10-05
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1543-1556
- ISSN
- 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0600
- OpenAlex
- W2528023122
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 84
- FWCI
- 14.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A cognitive-emotional model of NSSI: using emotion regulation and cognitive processes to explain why people self-injure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02699931.2016.1241219
- The paper
- Hasking, P., Whitlock, J., Voon, D., & Rose, A. (2017). A cognitive-emotional model of NSSI: using emotion regulation and cognitive processes to explain why people self-injure. Cognition and Emotion. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1241219
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.