CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 112Memory Processes and InfluencesEmotions and Moral BehaviorCategorization, perception, and language

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Situational knowledge and emotions

Conway, M. A., Bekerian, D. A.·1987·Cognition & Emotion
DOI 10.1080/02699938708408044
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Knowledge of situations in which various emotions might typically be experienced was investigated. An initial series of experiments collected normative data concerning groupings of emotions, general situational information and specific “scripts” for emotional experiences. A further series of experiments employed primed word recognition (lexical decision, naming) and an image generation task in which subjects were primed with emotion words or situational information. Strong priming effects were observed from situational information to emotion words. These findings suggested that situational information relating to emotions may be organised in a hierarchy in which personal memories of emotional experiences, “scripts” of emotional experiences general emotion situation information, and conceptual knowledge of emotions are closely interrelated. The implications of this hierarchical organisation for the representation of emotional knowledge in memory are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02699938708408044

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Bartlett F. C., 1932, Remembering.
  2. Conway M. A., Memory and cognition
  3. Conway M. A., Normative aspects of emotional situations.
  4. Lazarus R. S., 1970, Feeling and emotion.
  5. Linton M., 1982, Memory observed.
  6. Mandler C., 1982, Affect and cognition., 3
  7. 10.1037/0033-2909.86.1.37 · DOI
  8. Shaver P., 1983, Manuscript submitted for publication.
  9. 10.1037/0096-3445.112.1.1 · DOI
  10. Williams J. N., 1985, The effective contexts for priming word recognition.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 112

Related

Metadata

Authors
Conway, M. A., & Bekerian, D. A.
ORCID
Conway, M. A.
Venue
Cognition & Emotion
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
1987-04
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
145-191
ISSN
  • 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0600
DOI
10.1080/02699938708408044
OpenAlex
W2167637774
Cited by
111
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
Keywords
situational knowledge, emotions, emotional knowledge, emotional events, priming, lexical decision, word naming, image generation, memory representation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review