The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Are Women the “More Emotional” Sex? Evidence From Emotional Experiences in Social Context
Open accessAbstract
The present study examined whether sex differences in emotion are related to the social context and addressed differences between global, retrospective, and on-line, momentary self-descriptions of emotional experience and expression. Participants provided global, retrospective descriptions of their emotional characteristics at an initial session, and then provided momentary emotion ratings as well as details about the social context in which they experienced their emotions over a one-week period. We predicted and found that sex-related differences in emotion in global self-descriptions, but not in the averaged momentary ratings of emotion. Furthermore, only sex of the interaction partner elicited sex differences in emotionality; participants experienced and expressed more emotion when in opposite-sex dyads. Although most of the other context variables were themselves associated with emotional experience or expression, suggesting that they were emotionally evocative, none emerged as elicitors of sex differences in emotional experience; felt intimacy in the interaction was associated with sex differences in ratings of emotional expression. Together, the findings present certain caveats to the widely held belief that women are the ''more emotional'' sex.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model.
Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.61.2.226 · Cited by 8,384
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4 · Cited by 6,682
Signs of appeasement: Evidence for the distinct displays of embarrassment, amusement, and shame.
Keltner, D. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.441 · Cited by 718 · cited 1×
“In addition, perhaps interaction partners expect women to emit more emotion than men (Keltner, 1995), leading those partners to respond more frequently to women’ s displays of emotion.”
BackgroundGender and Age Stereotypes of Emotionality
Fabes, R. A., & Martin, C. L. (1991) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167291175008 · Cited by 356
Cited by
Mauss, I. B., & Robinson, M. D. (2009) · Cognition and Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699930802204677 · Cited by 2,078
Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report.
Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.934 · Cited by 1,806
Anticipatory and consummatory components of the experience of pleasure: A scale development study
Gard, D. E., Gard, M. G., Kring, A. M., & John, O. P. (2006) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.11.001 · Cited by 1,015
Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups.
Anderson, C., John, O. P., Keltner, D., & Kring, A. M. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.81.1.116 · Cited by 987
Gender Differences in Emotion Regulation: An fMRI Study of Cognitive Reappraisal
McRae, K., Ochsner, K. N., Mauss, I. B., Gabrieli, J. J. D., & Gross, J. J. (2008) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430207088035 · Cited by 910
Metadata
- Authors
- Barrett, L. F., Robin, L., Pietromonaco, P. R., & Eyssell, K. M.
- Venue
- Cognition & Emotion
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-07
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 555-578
- ISSN
- 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0600
- OpenAlex
- W2085224489
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are Women the “More Emotional” Sex? Evidence From Emotional Experiences in Social Context. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/026999398379565
- The paper
- Barrett, L. F., Robin, L., Pietromonaco, P. R., & Eyssell, K. M. (1998). Are Women the “More Emotional” Sex? Evidence From Emotional Experiences in Social Context. Cognition & Emotion. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999398379565
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.