The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methodological Considerations for Researchers and Practitioners Using Pedometers to Measure Physical (Ambulatory) Activity
Abstract
Researchers and practitioners require guidelines for using electronic pedometers to objectively quantify physical activity (specifically ambulatory activity) for research and surveillance as well as clinical and program applications. Methodological considerations include choice of metric and length of monitoring frame as well as different data recording and collection procedures. A systematic review of 32 empirical studies suggests we can expect 12,000-16,000 steps/day for 8-10-year-old children (lower for girls than boys); 7,000-13,000 steps/day for relatively healthy, younger adults (lower for women than men); 6,000-8,500 steps/day for healthy older adults; and 3,500-5,500 steps/day for individuals living with disabilities and chronic illnesses. These preliminary recommendations should be modified and refined, as evidence and experience using pedometers accumulates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kriska, A. M., Knowler, W. C., LaPorte, R. E., Drash, A. L., Wing, R. R., Blair, S. N., Bennett, P. H., & Kuller, L. H. (1990) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.13.4.401 · Cited by 755
Accuracy of five electronic pedometers for measuring distance walked
BASSETT, D. R., AINSWORTH, B. E., LEGGETT, S. R., MATHIEN, C. A., MAIN, J. A., HUNTER, D. C., & DUNCAN, G. E. (1996) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-199608000-00019 · Cited by 552
Yamanouchi, K., Shinozaki, T., Chikada, K., Nishikawa, T., Ito, K., Shimizu, S., Ozawa, N., Suzuki, Y., Maeno, H., Kato, K., et al. (1995) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.18.6.775 · Cited by 330
Measurement of daily walking distance-questionnaire versus pedometer
BASSETT, D. R. (2000) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-200005000-00021 · Cited by 260
Sequeira, M. M., Rickenbach, M., Wietlisbach, V., Tullen, B., & Schutz, Y. (1995) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117748 · Cited by 250
Ford, E. S., & Herman, W. H. (1995) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.18.1.27 · Cited by 126
Reliability assessment of pedometer activity measurements
Tryon, W. W., Pinto, L. P., & Morrison, D. F. (1991) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/bf00960737 · Cited by 34
Cited by
How Many Steps/Day Are Enough?: Preliminary Pedometer Indices for Public Health
Tudor-Locke, C., & Bassett, D. R. (2004) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-200434010-00001 · Cited by 2,054
Self-citationEstablishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships
Bickmore, T. W., & Picard, R. W. (2005) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/1067860.1067867 · Cited by 1,333
How many steps/day are enough? for adults
Tudor-Locke, C., Craig, C. L., Brown, W. J., Clemes, S. A., De Cocker, K., Giles-Corti, B., Hatano, Y., Inoue, S., Matsudo, S. M., Mutrie, N., et al. (2011) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-8-79 · Cited by 1,087
Self-citationValidity of 10 Electronic Pedometers for Measuring Steps, Distance, and Energy Cost
CROUTER, S. E., SCHNEIDER, P. L., KARABULUT, M., & BASSETT, D. R. (2003) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000078932.61440.a2 · Cited by 899
Utility of Pedometers for Assessing Physical Activity: Convergent Validity
Tudor-Locke, C., Williams, J. E., Reis, J. P., & Pluto, D. (2002) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-200232120-00004 · Cited by 649
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tudor-Locke, C. E., & Myers, A. M.
- Venue
- Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-12
- ISSN
- 0034-5377 (ISSN-L)
- 0270-1367
- 2168-3824
- OpenAlex
- W1995893254
- Cited by
- 518
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 12.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methodological Considerations for Researchers and Practitioners Using Pedometers to Measure Physical (Ambulatory) Activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02701367.2001.10608926
- The paper
- Tudor-Locke, C. E., & Myers, A. M. (2001). Methodological Considerations for Researchers and Practitioners Using Pedometers to Measure Physical (Ambulatory) Activity. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2001.10608926
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
