Cited by 899Physical Activity and HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiologyContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Validity of 10 Electronic Pedometers for Measuring Steps, Distance, and Energy Cost

CROUTER, SCOTT E., SCHNEIDER, PATRICK L., KARABULUT, MURAT, BASSETT, DAVID R.·2003·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

Purpose This study examined the effects of walking speed on the accuracy and reliability of 10 pedometers: Yamasa Skeletone (SK), Sportline 330 (SL330) and 345 (SL345), Omron (OM), Yamax Digiwalker SW-701 (DW), Kenz Lifecorder (KZ), New Lifestyles 2000 (NL), Oregon Scientific (OR), Freestyle Pacer Pro (FR), and Walk4Life LS 2525 (WL). Methods Ten subjects (33 +/- 12 yr) walked on a treadmill at various speeds (54, 67, 80, 94, and 107 m x min-1) for 5-min stages. Simultaneously, an investigator determined steps by a hand counter and energy expenditure (kcal) by indirect calorimetry. Each brand was measured on the right and left sides. Results Correlation coefficients between right and left sides exceeded 0.81 for all pedometers except OR (0.76) and SL345 (0.57). Most pedometers underestimated steps at 54 m x min-1, but accuracy for step counting improved at faster speeds. At 80 m x min-1 and above, six models (SK, OM, DW, KZ, NL, and WL) gave mean values that were within +/- 1% of actual steps. Six pedometers displayed the distance traveled. Most of them estimated mean distance to within +/- 10% at 80 m x min-1 but overestimated distance at slower speeds and underestimated distance at faster speeds. Eight pedometers displayed kilocalories, but except for KZ and NL, it is unclear whether this should reflect net or gross kilocalories. If one assumes they display net kilocalories, the general trend was an overestimation of kilocalories at every speed. If one assumes they display…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/01.mss.0000078932.61440.a2

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CROUTER, S. E., SCHNEIDER, P. L., KARABULUT, M., & BASSETT, D. R.
Affiliations
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2003-08
Volume
35
Issue
8
Pages
1455-1460
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142856621
Cited by
899
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 69
FWCI
11.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
pedometers, step count accuracy, walking speed, energy expenditure estimation, distance measurement, treadmill walking
MeSH terms
Adult, Energy Metabolism, Female, Gait, Humans, Male, Physiology, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Walking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review