Cited by 250Physical Activity and HealthContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsUrban Transport and Accessibility

Physical Activity Assessment Using a Pedometer and Its Comparison with a Questionnaire in a Large Population Survey

Sequeira, Maria M., Rickenbach, Martin, Wietlisbach, Vincent, Tullen, Benoit, Schutz, Yves·1995·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of the pedometer in epidemiologic research on physical activity. Within the framework of a health examination survey in 1988-1989, physical activity was assessed in a representative population sample of 493 men and women aged 25-74 years who were residents of Switzerland. They wore a pedometer for 1 week at work and during leisure time, and the results, converted into steps per day, were compared with answers to a questionnaire. The average number of steps per day decreased from 11,900 to 6,700 and from 9,300 to 7,300 for men and women, respectively, in the youngest to the oldest age groups. For men, categorized according to type of physical activity at work, there was a highly significant difference in the number of steps (p < 0.001), whereas in women the results were associated with leisure-time physical activity (p = 0.003). For both sexes, practicing sports more than once a week was associated with an important increase in steps per day. Analyzing the number of steps according to the day of the week and occupational category produced an unexpected result: Men with a physically active job engaged in more leisure-time physical activity on the weekend. The pedometer proved to be useful in assessing physical activity in a large, free-living population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117748

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sequeira, M. M., Rickenbach, M., Wietlisbach, V., Tullen, B., & Schutz, Y.
Affiliations
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (CH)
Corresponding author
Sequeira, Maria M.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1995-11-01
Volume
142
Issue
9
Pages
989-999
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2302601550
Cited by
250
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
Keywords
physical activity measurement, pedometers, step count, questionnaire comparison, occupational physical activity, leisure-time physical activity, sports participation, free-living physical activity, health examination surveys, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Equipment Design, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Occupations, Population Surveillance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Sex Factors, Walking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review