Cited by 7Retinal Development and DisordersRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryRetinal Diseases and Treatments

Feasibility of direct vitrectomy-sparing subretinal injection for gene delivery in large animals

Open access
Stranak, Zbynek, Ardan, Taras, Nemesh, Yaroslav, Toms, Maria, Toualbi, Lyes, Harbottle, Richard, Ellederova, Zdenka, Lytvynchuk, Lyubomyr +4 more·2024·Current Eye Research

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and feasibility of direct vitrectomy-sparing subretinal injection for gene delivery in a large animal model. METHODS: The experimental Liběchov minipigs were used for subretinal delivery of a plasmid DNA vector (pS/MAR-CMV-copGFP) with cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter, green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter (copGFP) and a scaffold/matrix attachment region (S/MAR) sequence. The eyes were randomized to subretinal injection of the vector following pars plana vitrectomy (control group) or a direct injection without prior vitrectomy surgery (experimental group). Intra- and post-operative observations up to 30 days after surgery were compared. RESULTS: Six eyes of three mini-pigs underwent surgery for delivery into the subretinal space. Two eyes in the control group were operated with a classical approach (lens-sparing vitrectomy and posterior hyaloid detachment). The other four eyes in the experimental group were injected directly with a subretinal cannula without vitrectomy surgery. No adverse events, such as endophthalmitis, retinal detachment and intraocular pressure elevation were observed post-operatively. The eyes in the experimental group had both shorter surgical time and recovery while achieving the same surgical goal. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrates that successful subretinal delivery of gene therapy vectors is achievable using a direct injection without prior vitrectomy surgery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02713683.2024.2343335

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The NANO SubRet Gateway Device technique reduced operating time and vector reflux from the retinotomy compared with vitrectomized eyes.

    “Notably, the technique also reduced operating time and vector reflux from the retinotomy compared with vitrectomized eyes (Stranak et al., 2024).”

    From Gene Therapy-Associated Uveitis (GTAU): Understanding and mitigating the adverse immune response in retinal gene therapy (2025) · cites this paper as Stranak et al., 2024

    The Results report shorter surgical times without vitrectomy (10–15 versus 15–30 minutes). Table 2 describes reflux as less common without vitrectomy only if the vector is less viscous than the vitreous; the claim omits that condition. The paper describes a vitrectomy-sparing injection technique but does not identify it as the NANO SubRet Gateway Device technique. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stranak, Z., Ardan, T., Nemesh, Y., Toms, M., Toualbi, L., Harbottle, R., Ellederova, Z., Lytvynchuk, L., Petrovski, G., Motlik, J., Moosajee, M., & Kozak, I.
Affiliations
  • Department of Ophthalmology, Charles University, Prague and the Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
  • The Francis Crick Institute (GB)
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
  • Libechov Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Libechov, Czech Republic
  • Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Department of Vitreoretinal Surgery and Research and Innovation, Moorfields Eye Hospitals UAE, Abu Dhabi
Corresponding author
Kozak, Igor
Venue
Current Eye Research
Published
2024-04-26
Volume
49
Issue
8
Pages
879-887
ISSN
  • 0271-3683 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2202
OpenAlex
W4395675238
Cited by
7
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Eye Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • The Francis Crick Institute (cc-by)
Funders
  • Johannes Amos Comenius Programme (Research Excellence in Regenerative medicine (CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004562)
  • AV21 Strategy (Czech Academy of Sciences) and IAPG institutional support (RVO 67985904)
  • Moorfields Eye Charity
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
subretinal gene delivery, plasmid vectors, GFP reporter, minipigs, pars plana vitrectomy, surgical safety, retinal gene therapy
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Feasibility Studies, Genetic Vectors, Pilot Projects, Plasmids, Retina, Swine, Swine, Miniature, Vitrectomy, Genetic Therapy, Gene Transfer Techniques, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Injections, Intraocular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review