Cited by 79Fire effects on ecosystemsRangeland and Wildlife ManagementArchaeology and ancient environmental studies

AN ASSESSMENT OF FIRE, CLIMATE, AND APACHE HISTORY IN THE SACRAMENTO MOUNTAINS, NEW MEXICO

Kaye, Margot W., Swetnam, Thomas W.·1999·Physical Geography

Abstract

Fire historians typically attribute the causes of temporal change in past fire regimes to climatic variation, human land use, or some combination of the two. Most long-term historical reconstructions, however, lack time and place-specific chronologies for all three variables of fire, climate, and people. To test the hypothesis that Mescalero Apache of southeastern New Mexico influenced fire regimes of the Sacramento Mountains, we reconstructed and compared chronologies of key variables for the period A.D. 1700 to the present. Fire-scarred trees were used to reconstruct fire frequencies and culturally modified (peeled) trees, and written histories were used to identify places and times of Mescalero presence. Independent precipitation reconstructions from tree rings were compared with fire and human histories. We found that Mescalero frequently visited the western escarpment of the Sacramento Mountains during the late 1700s through the late 1800s, especially the Dog Canyon area. Fire frequency was higher and seasonal timing of fires was different in sites near Dog Canyon compared to relatively distant sites. Inter-annual to decadal-scale drought might explain some temporal variability in fire and peeling activity, but these relationships were not consistent. We conclude that people increased fire occurrence during certain time periods in localized areas, but broad-scale and persistent human impacts did not occur until the end of the 19th century with the rise of livestock grazing by European settlers and fire suppression by government agencies. [Key words: Culturally modified trees, historical fire regimes, fire-climate-human interactions, Apache, New Mexico.]

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02723646.1999.10642681

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaye, M. W., & Swetnam, T. W.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Venue
Physical Geography
Published
1999-07
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
305-330
ISSN
  • 0272-3646 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-0557
OpenAlex
W2206782019
Cited by
79
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physical Geography (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Keywords
fire regimes, Mescalero Apache, fire history, fire-scarred trees, drought, fire frequency, Sacramento Mountains, livestock grazing, fire suppression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review