CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 355Reading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differential Effects of Number of Letters on Word and Nonword Naming Latency

Open access
Weekes, Brendan S.·1997·The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A
DOI 10.1080/027249897392170
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The issue addressed in this study is whether there are differential effects of number of letters on word and nonword naming latency. Experiment 1 examined the effect of number of letters on latency for naming high-frequency words, low-frequency words, and nonwords. Number of letters affected latency for low-frequency words and nonwords but did not affect latency for high-frequency words. Number of letters was also negatively correlated with number of orthographic neighbours, number of friends, and average grapheme frequency. Number of letters continued to affect nonword naming latency, but not low-frequency word naming latency, after the effects of orthographic neighbourhood size, number of friends, and average grapheme frequency had been accounted for. Experiment 2 found that number of letters had no effect on the latency of delayed naming of the same words and nonwords. It is concluded that the effect of number of letters on nonword naming reflects a sequential, non-lexical reading mechanism.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/027249897392170

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 355

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Weekes, B. S.
Affiliations
University of Kent (GB)
Corresponding author
Weekes, Brendan S.
ORCID
Weekes, Brendan S.
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1997-05-01
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
439-456
ISSN
  • 0272-4987 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0740
DOI
10.1080/027249897392170
OpenAlex
W1985090884
Cited by
354
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 19
FWCI
15.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
word frequency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review