Cited by 52Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

A descriptive study of home modifications for people with dementia and barriers to implementation

Open access
Marquardt, Gesine, Johnston, Deirdre, Black, Betty S., Morrison, Ann, Rosenblatt, Adam, Lyketsos, Constantine G., Samus, Quincy M.·2011·Journal of Housing for the Elderly

Abstract

This study describes home environmental features, safety issues, and health-related modifications in a community dwelling sample of 82 elderly people with dementia. Main barriers to the accessibility of the homes were steps, both inside and outside the house. The majority of the caregivers had made home modifications, which pertained mainly to physical limitations. Home modifications to support cognitive deficits were made to a lesser extent. The main barrier to the implementation of home modifications to accommodate the care recipient's memory loss was skepticism about their usefulness. Regarding the removal of physical barriers, financial constraints were most frequently mentioned.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02763893.2011.595612

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Silverstein NM Flaherty G Tobin TS 2006 Dementia and Wandering Behavior New York Springer
  2. Warner ML 2006 In search of the Alzheimer’s wanderer: a workbook to protect your loved one West Lafayette, Ind Purdue University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marquardt, G., Johnston, D., Black, B. S., Morrison, A., Rosenblatt, A., Lyketsos, C. G., & Samus, Q. M.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Journal of Housing for the Elderly
Published
2011-07
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
258-273
ISSN
  • 0276-3893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-353X
OpenAlex
W2044133715
Cited by
52
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Housing for the Elderly (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG051456)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH085142)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
home modification, dementia, home safety, accessibility, caregivers, implementation barriers, financial constraints, physical barriers, cognitive impairment, memory loss, community-dwelling older adults, family environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review