Cited by 53Asthma and respiratory diseasesRespiratory and Cough-Related ResearchChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

An Observational Investigation of Dysfunctional Breathing and Breathing Control Therapy in a Problem Asthma Clinic

Stanton, Andrew E., Vaughn, Pamela, Carter, Roger, Bucknall, Christine E.·2008·Journal of Asthma

Abstract

Objectives Dysfunctional breathing (DB) is recognized as an associated problem in patients with asthma and may be identified by the Nijmegen questionnaire. We conducted an observational study to determine if breathing control therapy (BCT) improved Nijmegen scores or asthma-related quality of life in patients attending a problem asthma clinic. Methods Nijmegen and Mini Asthma Quality of Life (Mini-AQLQ) questionnaires were completed. Patients with a positive Nijmegen (> or = 23, DB) were referred for BCT and progressive exercise testing (PET) to seek confirmation of dysfunctional breathing. Follow-up questionnaire data were collected at 6 months. Results A total of 102 patients were studied. The total mean Nijmegen score was 26.4 (range 1-61). Those with a score > or = 23 (DB group, n = 65, 64%) had significantly lower Mini-AQLQ (mean 2.83) than the non-DB group (n = 37, mean 4.12, 95% CI for difference 0.87, 1.87, p Conclusions The strong relationship between Mini-AQLQ and Nijmegen scores and poor relationship between Nijmegen scores and PET-identified inappropriate hyperventilation suggest that a positive Nijmegen score overestimates the presence of dysfunctional breathing in patients with moderate to severe asthma. We found no evidence that a moderate intensity breathing control intervention had any impact on Nijmegen scores or asthma-related quality of life in this patient group.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02770900802252093

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stanton, A. E., Vaughn, P., Carter, R., & Bucknall, C. E.
Affiliations
Glasgow Royal Infirmary (GB)
Venue
Journal of Asthma
Published
2008-01
Volume
45
Issue
9
Pages
758-765
ISSN
  • 0277-0903 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-4303
OpenAlex
W2025380015
Cited by
53
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Asthma (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
dysfunctional breathing, asthma, Nijmegen questionnaire, Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, asthma quality of life, treatment outcomes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Asthma, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Respiration Disorders, Respiratory Function Tests, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review