Cited by 201Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentEducational Environments and Student OutcomesAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Teachers' Narratives About Their Relationships With Children: Associations With Behavior in Classrooms

Stuhlman, Megan W., Pianta, Robert C.·2002·School Psychology Review

Abstract

Teachers' narratives concerning their relationships with children were elicited through semistructured interviews and examined in relation to teachers' characteristics and observations of teachers' behavior with children in the classroom. Fifty teachers in kindergarten (N = 21) and first grade (N = 29) were interviewed about their relationships with a specific child and their classrooms were observed for one-half day. Interviews were coded for seven constructs reflective of different aspects of their relationship with that specific child, including compliance, achievement, secure base, neutralizing of negative emotion, positive affect, and negative affect. Teachers' reports on the interview were significantly related to several aspects of observed child behavior toward them as well as observed teacher behavior toward the child. The feature of teachers' responses to interview questions most frequently associated with classroom behavior was expressed negative emotion. Associations between mentioning compliance and expressing negative affect during the interview and observed behavior remained significant even after controlling for the child's positive affect and self-reliance and teacher experience. Furthermore, among teachers with fewer years of experience, there was no relation between expressed negative emotion in relationship narratives and sensitivity in interactions with children. This was not the case for teachers with more experience. Results are discussed in terms of th…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02796015.2002.12086148

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Temperamental predisposition to approach versus withdraw plays an important role in structuring young children's opportunities to engage teachers positively; teachers spend more time talking with and instructing children viewed as more emotionally positive and less negative, difficult, or clingy.

    “Temperamental predisposition to approach versus withdraw has been argued to play a particularly important role in structuring young children’s opportunities to engage their teachers in positive ways; for example, teachers have been found to spend more time talking with and providing instruction to children whom they view as more emotionally positive and less negative, difficult to manage, or cling”

    From School Readiness and Self-Regulation: A Developmental Psychobiological Approach (2015) · cites this paper as Stuhlman & Pianta 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stuhlman, M. W., & Pianta, R. C.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Pianta, Robert C.
Venue
School Psychology Review
Published
2002-06-01
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
148-163
ISSN
  • 0279-6015 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-966X
OpenAlex
W1741668816
Cited by
201
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
10.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
School Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
teacher-child relationship, teacher narratives, classroom behavior, negative affect, compliance, secure base, teacher sensitivity, teacher experiences, kindergarten teachers, first grade teachers, self-reliance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review