Cited by 174Physical Activity and HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiologyHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

Exercise on prescription in general practice: A systematic review

Sørensen, Jes Bak, Skovgaard, Thomas, Puggaard, Lis·2006·Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care

Abstract

'Exercise on Prescription' (EoP) is used for initiating physical activity among sedentary patients with signs of lifestyle diseases. EoP is personalized secondary prevention in primary healthcare. This review addresses EoP using a Health Technology Assessment perspective and aims to answer the following questions: (1) Does EoP increase physical activity level or physical fitness, and is more intensive EoP more effective than less intensive? (2) Is EoP acceptable and feasible in general practice? (3) Is EoP acceptable to and feasible for sedentary patients? (4) Is EoP cost-effective? EoP studies were searched using Medline thesaurus topic, Medline WinSPIRS, reference lists of recent reviews, and NLM Gateway Locator plus. A total of 22 studies were included in the review. Most studies reported moderate improvements in physical activity or physical fitness for 6-12 months. Among patients receiving EoP 10% more had improved physical activity level compared with controls and mean aerobic fitness was improved by 5-10% among EoP patients compared with controls. Little evidence existed in support of the hypothesis that more intensive EoP is more effective. EoP was acceptable and feasible to GPs and patients volunteering for EoP. However, little is known about non-completers, patients declining EoP, and GPs not highly motivated for using EoP. Only one study addressed health economic issues. It found EoP cost-effective, but comparisons with other interventions have not been performed. Even though most studies in this review presented favourable results for EoP there is a lack of evidence in several fields. In particular we lack high-quality studies evaluating EoP schemes that are sustainable in everyday use in general practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02813430600700027

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent systematic review of Exercise on Prescription Schemes found limited evidence about their effectiveness.

    “However, a recent systematic review of Exercise on Prescription Schemes found limited evidence about their effectiveness and recommended further research (Sorensen 2006).”

    From Exercise for depression (2009) · cites this paper as Sorensen 2006

  • Primary care-based interventions for increasing physical activity are effective.

    “primary care-based interventions for increasing physical activity (PA) are effective [4-7]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sørensen, J. B., Skovgaard, T., & Puggaard, L.
Affiliations
University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Sørensen, Jes Bak
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
Published
2006-01
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
69-74
ISSN
  • 0281-3432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1502-7724
OpenAlex
W2126881613
Cited by
174
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 13 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
exercise prescription, physical activity promotion, sedentary patients, lifestyle-related diseases, secondary prevention, general practice, physical fitness, cardiorespiratory fitness, feasibility and acceptability, cost-effectiveness, health technology assessment
MeSH terms
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Exercise Therapy, Family Practice, Health Promotion, Humans, Life Style, Motor Activity, Physical Fitness, Exercise, Prescriptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review