Cited by 24Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentOphthalmology and Eye Disorders

Differentiation between the two types of amiodarone-associated thyrotoxicosis using duplex and amplitude doppler sonography

Macedo, T. A. A., Chammas, M. C., Jorge, P. T., Souza, L. P., Farage, L., Watanabe, T., Santos, V. A., Cerri, G. G.·2007·Acta Radiologica

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the usefulness of Doppler parameters in the differentiation between the two types of amiodarone-associated thyrotoxicosis (AAT). Material and Methods: One hundred thirty-seven individuals were selected at our institution. They were divided into four groups: 84 normal subjects (N), 30 euthyroids taking amiodarone (A), 14 AAT type 1 patients (AAT1), and nine AAT type 2 patients (AAT2). Each AAT type was classified according to 131 I uptake and clinical outcome. Blindly, the resistance and pulsatility indexes (RI, PI), systolic peak velocity, and color pixel density (CPD) were calculated. Results: AAT1 had greater CPD than AAT2 ( P = 0.02). The latter group had similar vascularization to the N and A groups ( P = 0.45). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that systolic peak velocity in the inferior thyroid arteries and CPD were the best parameters in the differentiation between AAT type 1 and AAT type 2 (Az = 0.83 and 0.84, respectively). Impedance indexes were useless. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that objective tests such as systolic peak velocities in the thyroid arteries and CPD are reliable parameters for differentiating between the two types of AAT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02841850701280791

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Macedo, T. A. A., Chammas, M. C., Jorge, P. T., Souza, L. P., Farage, L., Watanabe, T., Santos, V. A., & Cerri, G. G.
Affiliations
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Corresponding author
Macedo, T. A. A.
Venue
Acta Radiologica
Published
2007-05
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
412-421
ISSN
  • 0284-1851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0455
OpenAlex
W2158187533
Cited by
24
References
21
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Radiologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders
Keywords
duplex ultrasound, inferior thyroid artery, peak systolic velocity, resistance index, pulsatility index, thyroid vascularization, differential diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Amiodarone, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Atrial Fibrillation, Blood Flow Velocity, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Pulsatile Flow, ROC Curve, Thyroid Gland, Thyrotoxicosis, Vascular Resistance, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex, Ventricular Premature Complexes, Area Under Curve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review