CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 233Teacher Professional Development and MotivationJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 88 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Teachers' well-being and job satisfaction: the important role of positive emotions in the workplace

Dreer, Benjamin·2024·Educational Studies
DOI 10.1080/03055698.2021.1940872
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

With teacher shortages around the world and high attrition rates in some countries, teachers who experience high job satisfaction offer solid support for school systems as they are healthier, more productive and more likely to retain their job in the long term. This study sheds light on the relationship between job-related well-being and job satisfaction. It investigates the extent to which the well-being domains of (P) positive emotions, (E) engagement, (R) relationships, (M) meaning and (A) achievement are linked to job satisfaction. To do so, it analyses data from 511 German schoolteachers. Results show that higher PERMA profiles were linked to higher job satisfaction rates. Analyses further specified that, of the five factors, positive emotions provided the strongest contribution in predicting job satisfaction. The results suggest that the job-related well-being of teachers, especially positive emotions in the workplace, play an important role in teachers’ job satisfaction and their subsequent retention.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03055698.2021.1940872

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 89 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Gouasé, N., O. Braun, and G. Raab. 2019. “Multimethod Stress Evaluation: Effects of an Intervention on Teachers’.” Health Including Self-Report and Biologically Measurement Poster presented at 33rd annual conference of the European Health Psychology Society, Dubrovnik, Croatia, September 3–7.
  4. 10.1371/journal.pone.0225932.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225932 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Dreer, B.
Affiliations
University of Erfurt (DE)
Corresponding author
Dreer, Benjamin
ORCID
Dreer, Benjamin
Venue
Educational Studies
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2021-06-15
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
61-77
ISSN
  • 0305-5698 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3400
DOI
10.1080/03055698.2021.1940872
OpenAlex
W3176912657
Cited by
233
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 2
FWCI
45.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
teacher well-being, job satisfaction, positive emotions, PERMA model, teacher retention, teacher attrition, teacher shortage, workplace relationships, meaningful work, achievement, engagement, school teachers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review