Cited by 169Menstrual Health and DisordersAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones

A comparison of the menstruation and education experiences of girls in Tanzania, Ghana, Cambodia and Ethiopia.

Sommer, Marni, Ackatia-Armah, Nana, Connolly, Susan, Smiles, Dana·2015·Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education

Abstract

The barriers to menstrual hygiene management faced by adolescent schoolgirls in low-income countries are gaining interest at practice and policy levels. The challenges include inadequate water, sanitation and disposal facilities for the management of menses with privacy and dignity, and insufficient guidance to help girls feel confident in attending school during menses. The studies described here aimed to examine how menarche impacts the lives of schoolgirls in three low-income countries (Ghana, Cambodia and Ethiopia). The focus included girls’ school participation; their relationship with parents, teachers and peers; their evolving sanitation and hygiene needs; their understanding of cultural issues and taboos around menses; and what education, if any, they received prior to and during puberty. This comparative analysis was aimed at identifying similarities between the three countries that would enable the adaptation to each context of a training book on menstruation issues for girls, which was developed from a previous study conducted in Tanzania. In all three countries, participatory activities were utilised with girls and results were analysed using grounded theory. Findings included: similarities regarding the importance of culture in perpetuating negative attitudes towards menstruation, limited provision of health information and insufficient facilities within schools. Differences were revealed regarding menstrual myths, parent–child dynamics, sources of guidance and student–teacher relations. There is a critical knowledge gap around menstruation and girls’ education in these contexts that must be addressed to ensure that girls experience a positive menarche and can manage menstrual hygiene.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03057925.2013.871399

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 169

Authors
Sommer, M., Ackatia-Armah, N., Connolly, S., & Smiles, D.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Sommer, Marni
Venue
Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education
Published
2014-01-24
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
589-609
ISSN
  • 0305-7925 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-3623
OpenAlex
W2068635646
Cited by
169
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
8.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Compare A Journal of Comparative and International Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Keywords
menstruation, menstrual hygiene management, adolescent schoolgirls, menarche, school attendance, menstrual taboos, menstrual myths, parent-child relationship, teacher-student relationship, school sanitation facilities, menstrual health education, low-income countries, Tanzania, Ghana, Cambodia, Ethiopia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review