The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
Beating the bounds: how does ‘open source’ become a seed commons?
Abstract
In response to ongoing plant genetic enclosures, the Open Source Seed Initiative (OSSI) is creating a ‘protected commons’ for seed. It is a project, I argue, that reflects characteristics of a growing transnational commoning movement. From the Zapatistas to seed wars, such movements draw attention to commons not simply as a resource, but as a dynamic and evolving social activity: commoning. In the US, OSSI includes 38 plant breeders, 48 seed companies and 377 crop varieties. Yet challenges remain for OSSI to gain wider legitimacy for ‘freed seed’, to build trust in a moral pledge, and to establish fair guidelines for which people and which seed can participate in making the commons. Using the metaphor of ‘beating the bounds’ – a feudal practice of contesting enclosures – I ask how OSSI defends the commons in intersecting arenas. The first way is legal, as OSSI negotiates a move from contract law toward moral economy law. Next is epistemic, as an informal breeder network revitalizes farmer knowledge, while proving more structurally able and culturally equipped to lead commoning efforts. Finally, I reflect on the nature of boundary beating itself, aided by Global South movements. Seed sovereignty perspectives suggest room for a pluriverse of commons to grow.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Additionally, agroecology has advanced dynamic and nationalliberation-oriented approaches to farm-level biological technology, in particular concerning seeds (Wit, 2017).”
From Theories of Political Ecology: Monopoly Capital Against People and the Planet (2023) · cites this paper as Wit, 2017
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 70
- 10.1177/1466138111400721 · DOI
- 10.3362/9781780442150 · DOI
- Aoki K., 2008, Seed wars: Controversies and cases on plant genetic resources and intellectual property
- Aoki K., 2009, Fordham Law Review, 77, 2275
- 10.1177/0896920516661856 · DOI
- Barlow M., 2005, Blue gold: the fight to stop the corporate theft of the world’s water
- Barnes P., 2001, Who owns the sky?
- 10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661 · DOI · Paper page
- Benkler Y., 2011, The penguin and the leviathan: The triumph of cooperation over self-Interest
- Bollier D., 2003, Silent theft: The private plunder of our common wealth
- Bollier D., 2005, Brand name Bullies: The quest to own and control culture
- Bollier D., 2014, Think like a commoner: A short introduction to the life of the commons
- Bollier D., 2015, Patterns of commoning
- 10.1002/9781119107743.ch5 · DOI
- Carney J.A., 2001, Black rice: The African origins of rice cultivation in the Americas, 10.4159/9780674029217 · DOI
- Cavanagh John, 2002, Alternatives to economic globalization: A better world is possible
- 10.2307/3481419 · DOI
- 10.1163/1569206041551609 · DOI
- Deppe C., 1993, Breed your own vegetable varieties: The gardener’s and farmer’s guide to plant breeding and seed saving
- Escobar A., 1994, Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world
- Escobar A., 2015, Patterns of commoning, 348
- 10.1111/gec3.12070 · DOI
- 10.4324/9780203444894 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10460-013-9428-8 · DOI
- Gramsci A., 1971, Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci
- Grossman L.S., 1998, The political ecology of bananas: Contract farming, peasants, and agrarian change in the Eastern Caribbean, 10.37234/DQPRQJHJ · DOI
- Hamilton L.M., 2014, Virginia Quarterly Review, 90, 56
- 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243 · DOI · Paper page
- Harvey D., 2003, The new imperialism, 10.1093/oso/9780199264315.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- Hindle S., 2003, The poor in England, 1700–1850: An economy of makeshifts, 52
- 10.3390/su1041266 · DOI
- 10.2135/cropsci2014.09.0669 · DOI
- Howard P.H., 2016, Concentration and power in the food system: Who controls what we eat?, 10.5040/9781474264365 · DOI
- 10.1080/14747731.2014.957587 · DOI
- Illich Ivan., 1981, Shadow Work
- 10.3390/su1020120 · DOI
- 10.1057/978-1-137-52261-0_6 · DOI
- Kloppenburg J.R., 1988, First the seed: The political economy of plant biotechnology, 1492–2000
- 10.1080/03066150.2013.875897 · DOI
- Kloppenburg J.R., 2014, Organic seed growers conference proceedings, 144
- Lessig L., 2004, Free culture: How big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity
- Linebaugh P., 2008, The Magna Carta manifesto: Liberties and commons for All, 10.1525/9780520932708 · DOI
- Linebaugh P., 2014, Stop, thief! The commons, enclosures and resistance
- 10.1002/9781119279723.ch6 · DOI
- 10.2135/cropsci2014.10.0708 · DOI
- Madison M.J., 2009, Cornell Law Review, 95, 657
- Marx K., 1977, Capital: A critique of political economy, 1
- 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00406.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s12571-015-0528-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/03066150.2016.1168405 · DOI
- Mooney P.R., 1983, Seeds of the earth: A private or public resource?
- 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2005.EPLP.57.en · DOI
- Morton F., 2014, Organic seed growers conference proceedings, 147
- 10.1079/RAF200486 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511807763 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/143449 · DOI
- 10.1080/03066150.2016.1264581 · DOI
- Robbins P., 2012, Political ecology: A critical introduction. 2nd ed. Critical introductions to geography
- 10.1080/03066150.2016.1234455 · DOI
- Shiva V., 1997, Biopiracy: The plunder of nature and knowledge
- Smith C., 2016, The relationship between intellectual property rights and small-scale farmer innovations
- Tapia M., 2013, Common pools of genetic resources: Equity and innovation in international biodiversity law, 79
- 10.1093/past/50.1.76 · DOI · Paper page
- Thompson E.P., 1975, Whigs and hunters: The origin of the Black Act
- 10.3362/9781780445588 · DOI
- UPOV, 1961, International convention for the protection of new varieties of plants
- 10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00156.x · DOI
- 10.1080/03066150.2015.1130702 · DOI
- Watts M., 2000, A companion to economic geography, 257
- Zimmerer K.S., 1996, Changing fortunes: Biodiversity and peasant livelihood in the Peruvian Andes, 10.1525/9780520917033 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Theories of Political Ecology: Monopoly Capital Against People and the Planet
Ajl, M. (2023) · Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1177/22779760221145232 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Montenegro de Wit, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Peasant Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-10-25
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 44-79
- ISSN
- 0306-6150
- 1743-9361
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beating the bounds: how does ‘open source’ become a seed commons? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03066150.2017.1383395
- The paper
- Montenegro de Wit, M. (2019). Beating the bounds: how does ‘open source’ become a seed commons? The Journal of Peasant Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1383395