CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 305Academic integrity and plagiarismStudent Assessment and FeedbackHigher Education and Employability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The role of authentic assessment to preserve academic integrity and promote skill development and employability

Open access
Sotiriadou, Popi, Logan, Danielle, Daly, Amanda, Guest, Ross·2020·Studies in Higher Education
DOI 10.1080/03075079.2019.1582015
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Promoting authenticity and academic integrity in assessment continues to present a priority for educational institutions. Besides providing the foundation for high academic standards and best practice, authentic assessments and academic integrity enrich students with skills that advance their employability. Given the multilayered significance of, and need for promoting academic integrity, this study used a suite of scaffolded authentic assessments that culminated with interactive oral examinations. A survey evaluated the effectiveness of interactive oral exams in offering authentic assessments that would prevent students from engaging in academic misconduct and help them improve their skill and employability prospects. The results show that scaffolded assessment tasks that include interactive orals help prevent academic misconduct. The more relevant the assessment to real-world scenarios, the less likely students are to engage in misconduct. Additionally, interactive oral exams enabled students to develop their professional identity and awareness, and communications skills, and help promote employability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03075079.2019.1582015

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 36 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Baker Ron., 2017, The Accounting Educators’ Journal, 26
  2. Commonwealth of Australia, 2018, Higher Education Support Act 2003, No. 149
  3. Howell C., 2016, Proceedings of the 6th annual assessment conference of the Association for the Assessment of Learning in Higher Education (AALHE)
  4. Šprajc P., 2017, Organization: Journal of Management, Information Systems and Human Resources, 50, 33

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 305

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Sotiriadou, P., Logan, D., Daly, A., & Guest, R.
Affiliations
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • Learning & Teaching Consultant (Design), Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
Corresponding author
Sotiriadou, Popi
ORCID
Venue
Studies in Higher Education
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2019-02-26
Volume
45
Issue
11
Pages
2132-2148
ISSN
  • 0307-5079 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-174X
DOI
10.1080/03075079.2019.1582015
OpenAlex
W2917546397
Cited by
265
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 14
FWCI
31.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Studies in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
Keywords
authentic assessment, academic integrity, academic misconduct, employability, skill development, professional identity, communication skills, higher education assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review