The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Equity and diversity in institutional approaches to student–staff partnership schemes in higher education
Open accessAbstract
Student cohorts in higher education are rapidly diversifying. Approaches to student engagement in teaching and learning must evolve to meet the changing needs of these diverse groups of students equitably. Student–staff partnership is an approach to student engagement embracing the diverse experiences of both students and staff. Growing evidence shows significant positive outcomes for students and staff. Practice, however, is dominated by small scale initiatives, limiting opportunities for equitable engagement. In institutions where partnership has been scaled-up, little research has explored these institutional partnership schemes. Our research addresses this gap by exploring institutional approaches to partnership across 11 universities in the United Kingdom. Results provide important lessons for improving equity in access to partnership schemes and the need for broader conceptions of scaling up partnership.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Student partnerships have a positive impact on equitable engagement.
“the growing evidence that student partnerships have a positive impact on equitable engagement”
From Assessment design through co-creation (2025) · cites this paper as Mercer-Mapstone & Bovill, 2020
The dialogic nature of AI Co-Creators projects was best suited to working with an individual student, rather than several students.
“The dialogic nature of these projects was therefore best suited to working with an individual student, rather than several students (Mercer-Mapstone & Bovill, 2020).”
From Assessment design through co-creation (2025) · cites this paper as Mercer-Mapstone & Bovill, 2020
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017) · International Journal for Students as Partners · doi:10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119 · Cited by 626
Self-citationConceptions of students as partners
Matthews, K. E., Dwyer, A., Hine, L., & Turner, J. (2018) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-018-0257-y · Cited by 208
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- 10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3230 · DOI
- Acai Anita, Teaching in Higher Education
- Advance HE., 2018, Equality in Higher Education: Statistical Report 2018
- 10.1002/tia2.20053 · DOI
- 10.2307/j.ctt22h6r81 · DOI
- 10.15173/ijsap.v2i2.3536 · DOI
- Bishop Daniel., 2018, RAISE Network Conference
- 10.1080/13601441003738343 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Carnevale Anthony P., 2013, Separate and Unequal: How Higher Education Reinforces the Intergenerational Reproduction of White Racial Privilege
- Cook-Sather A., 2015, Teachers College Record, 117, 1, 10.1177/016146811511700204 · DOI
- 10.1080/07294360.2018.1457629 · DOI
- 10.1002/j.2334-4822.2013.tb00710.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1548-1492.2010.01109.x · DOI
- Cook-Sather A., 2014, Engaging Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching: A Guide for Faculty
- Dollinger Mollie, Teaching & Learning Inquiry
- 10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.121 · DOI
- 10.1080/1360144X.2019.1594235 · DOI
- 10.1080/03075070600680521 · DOI
- Garner W., 2016, Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 1, 1
- Healey M., 2014, Higher Education Academy
- 10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3472 · DOI
- 10.1177/174498710501000303 · DOI
- 10.15173/ijsap.v2i2.3575 · DOI
- Kuh George., 2008, High-Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter
- 10.1080/00091383.2017.1366805 · DOI
- 10.1080/13562517.2016.1183623 · DOI
- Marquis E., 2017, Disciplinary Approaches to Connecting the Higher Education Curriculum, 203
- 10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3300 · DOI
- 10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3315 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/03075079.2018.1482268 · DOI
- 10.21100/jeipc.v1i1.162 · DOI
- 10.1080/03075070802562857 · DOI
- 10.20429/ijsotl.2010.040216 · DOI
- Meer Nicky, 2015, Business and Management Education in HE, 1
- 10.1080/13562517.2017.1391198 · DOI
- 10.20429/ijsotl.2008.020216 · DOI
- 10.1080/03098265.2015.1066316 · DOI
- 10.15173/ijsap.v2i2.3628 · DOI
- Peseta, Tai, Jenny Pizzica, Ashley Beathe, Chinnu Jose, Racquel Lynch, Marisse Manthos, Kathy Nguyen, and Hassan Raza. Forthcoming. “A Partnership Mindset: Students as Partners for and Beyond the University.” In The Power of Student-Staff Partnerships: Revolutionizing Higher Education , edited by Lucy Mercer-Mapstone and Sophia Abbot. Elon, USA: Center for Engaged Learning Press.
- UK Government, 2013, The Benefits of Higher Education Participation for Individuals and Society: key Findings and Reports “The Quadrants”
- 10.1080/03075079812331380286 · DOI
- 10.1080/1360144X.2018.1520110 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Co-creation in learning and teaching: the case for a whole-class approach in higher education
Bovill, C. (2020) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-019-00453-w · Cited by 535
Self-citationMercer-Mapstone, L., Islam, M., & Reid, T. (2021) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2019.1655396 · Cited by 69
Self-citationAssessment design through co-creation
Williams, A., & Ingle, E. (2025) · International Journal for Students as Partners · doi:10.15173/ijsap.v9i1.5802 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Mercer-Mapstone, L., & Bovill, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Mercer-Mapstone, Lucy
- Venue
- Studies in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-05-27
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2541-2557
- ISSN
- 0307-5079 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-174X
- OpenAlex
- W2946896445
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 27.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Studies in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Government
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Governance and Development
- Keywords
- student-staff partnership, student engagement, equity, diversity, institutional approach, scale-up, higher education, student cohorts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review