Cited by 105Higher Education Practises and EngagementHigher Education Research StudiesHigher Education Governance and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Equity and diversity in institutional approaches to student–staff partnership schemes in higher education

Open access
Mercer-Mapstone, Lucy, Bovill, Catherine·2020·Studies in Higher Education

Abstract

Student cohorts in higher education are rapidly diversifying. Approaches to student engagement in teaching and learning must evolve to meet the changing needs of these diverse groups of students equitably. Student–staff partnership is an approach to student engagement embracing the diverse experiences of both students and staff. Growing evidence shows significant positive outcomes for students and staff. Practice, however, is dominated by small scale initiatives, limiting opportunities for equitable engagement. In institutions where partnership has been scaled-up, little research has explored these institutional partnership schemes. Our research addresses this gap by exploring institutional approaches to partnership across 11 universities in the United Kingdom. Results provide important lessons for improving equity in access to partnership schemes and the need for broader conceptions of scaling up partnership.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03075079.2019.1620721

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Student partnerships have a positive impact on equitable engagement.

    “the growing evidence that student partnerships have a positive impact on equitable engagement”

    From Assessment design through co-creation (2025) · cites this paper as Mercer-Mapstone & Bovill, 2020

  • The dialogic nature of AI Co-Creators projects was best suited to working with an individual student, rather than several students.

    “The dialogic nature of these projects was therefore best suited to working with an individual student, rather than several students (Mercer-Mapstone & Bovill, 2020).”

    From Assessment design through co-creation (2025) · cites this paper as Mercer-Mapstone & Bovill, 2020

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. 10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3230 · DOI
  2. Acai Anita, Teaching in Higher Education
  3. Advance HE., 2018, Equality in Higher Education: Statistical Report 2018
  4. 10.1002/tia2.20053 · DOI
  5. 10.2307/j.ctt22h6r81 · DOI
  6. 10.15173/ijsap.v2i2.3536 · DOI
  7. Bishop Daniel., 2018, RAISE Network Conference
  8. 10.1080/13601441003738343 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Carnevale Anthony P., 2013, Separate and Unequal: How Higher Education Reinforces the Intergenerational Reproduction of White Racial Privilege
  11. Cook-Sather A., 2015, Teachers College Record, 117, 1, 10.1177/016146811511700204 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/07294360.2018.1457629 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/j.2334-4822.2013.tb00710.x · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1548-1492.2010.01109.x · DOI
  15. Cook-Sather A., 2014, Engaging Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching: A Guide for Faculty
  16. Dollinger Mollie, Teaching & Learning Inquiry
  17. 10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.121 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/1360144X.2019.1594235 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/03075070600680521 · DOI
  20. Garner W., 2016, Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 1, 1
  21. Healey M., 2014, Higher Education Academy
  22. 10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3472 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/174498710501000303 · DOI
  24. 10.15173/ijsap.v2i2.3575 · DOI
  25. Kuh George., 2008, High-Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter
  26. 10.1080/00091383.2017.1366805 · DOI
  27. 10.1080/13562517.2016.1183623 · DOI
  28. Marquis E., 2017, Disciplinary Approaches to Connecting the Higher Education Curriculum, 203
  29. 10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3300 · DOI
  30. 10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3315 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1080/03075079.2018.1482268 · DOI
  32. 10.21100/jeipc.v1i1.162 · DOI
  33. 10.1080/03075070802562857 · DOI
  34. 10.20429/ijsotl.2010.040216 · DOI
  35. Meer Nicky, 2015, Business and Management Education in HE, 1
  36. 10.1080/13562517.2017.1391198 · DOI
  37. 10.20429/ijsotl.2008.020216 · DOI
  38. 10.1080/03098265.2015.1066316 · DOI
  39. 10.15173/ijsap.v2i2.3628 · DOI
  40. Peseta, Tai, Jenny Pizzica, Ashley Beathe, Chinnu Jose, Racquel Lynch, Marisse Manthos, Kathy Nguyen, and Hassan Raza. Forthcoming. “A Partnership Mindset: Students as Partners for and Beyond the University.” In The Power of Student-Staff Partnerships: Revolutionizing Higher Education , edited by Lucy Mercer-Mapstone and Sophia Abbot. Elon, USA: Center for Engaged Learning Press.
  41. UK Government, 2013, The Benefits of Higher Education Participation for Individuals and Society: key Findings and Reports “The Quadrants”
  42. 10.1080/03075079812331380286 · DOI
  43. 10.1080/1360144X.2018.1520110 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mercer-Mapstone, L., & Bovill, C.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Mercer-Mapstone, Lucy
Venue
Studies in Higher Education
Published
2019-05-27
Volume
45
Issue
12
Pages
2541-2557
ISSN
  • 0307-5079 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-174X
OpenAlex
W2946896445
Cited by
105
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5
FWCI
27.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Studies in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Government
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Governance and Development
Keywords
student-staff partnership, student engagement, equity, diversity, institutional approach, scale-up, higher education, student cohorts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review