The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The economy of qualities
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to highlight the main characteristics of what the authors call 'the economy of qualities'. The authors show that qualifying products and positioning goods are major concerns for agents evolving within the 'economy of qualities'. Competition in such an economy is structured through two basic mechanisms. The first is what the authors propose to call the process of singularization of products. The second is the mechanism whereby consumers are attached to, and detached from, goods that are proposed to them. At the heart of these logics, one can find multiple socio-technical devices that are designed by economic agents, which ensure the distribution of cognitive competencies, and which constantly and finely tune supply and demand. Relying upon Jean Gadrey's work, the authors claim that the economy of qualities is nowhere more effective than in services providing activities, and especially in those sectors that invest heavily in New Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs). Finally, the authors suggest that, in the economy of qualities, the functioning and the organization of markets are issues that are shared by scholars and actors. In these highly reflexive markets, a collaboration between them is needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hutchins, E. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001 · Cited by 10,801
Cited by
Toward a Comparative Sociology of Valuation and Evaluation
Lamont, M. (2012) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120022 · Cited by 1,492
Peripheral Vision: Economic Markets as Calculative Collective Devices
Callon, M., & Muniesa, F. (2005) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840605056393 · Cited by 1,378
Self-citationTwo Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-2158 · Cited by 709
Fligstein, N., & Dauter, L. (2007) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131736 · Cited by 601
Garud, R. (2008) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00783.x · Cited by 236
Quality Food, Public Procurement, and Sustainable Development: The School Meal Revolution in Rome
Sonnino, R. (2009) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a40112 · Cited by 144
Profit and Gift in the Digital Economy
Elder-Vass, D. (2016) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316536421 · Cited by 133
Schurr, C. (2017) · Environment and Planning D: Society and Space · doi:10.1177/0263775816638851 · Cited by 91
Trade-off or convergence? The role of food security in the evolution of food discourse in Italy
Brunori, G., Malandrin, V., & Rossi, A. (2013) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.01.013 · Cited by 82
The sociology of a market analysis tool: How industry analysts sort vendors and organize markets
Pollock, N., & Williams, R. (2009) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2009.01.001 · Cited by 63
Alternative Food Networks: An Interdisciplinary Assessment
(2018) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-90409-2 · Cited by 61
Mediating Uncertainty: Communicating the Financial Risks of Nanotechnologies
Ebeling, M. F. E. (2008) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547007312068 · Cited by 49
(2014) · HAL · Cited by 39
2. The Uses of Use Value: Marketing, Value Creation, and the Exigencies of Consumption Work
Foster, R. J. (2011) · Inside Marketing · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199576746.003.0003 · Cited by 29
Africa Has Never Been “Traditional”: So Can We Make a General Case? A Response to the Articles
Guyer, J. I. (2007) · African Studies Review · doi:10.1353/arw.2007.0095 · Cited by 13
(Re)making quality in China’s dairy industry
Tracy, M. (2018) · Asian Anthropology · doi:10.1080/1683478x.2018.1518122 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Callon, M., Méadel, C., & Rabeharisoa, V.
- Venue
- Economy and Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 194-217
- ISSN
- 0308-5147 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5766
- OpenAlex
- W2147619096
- Cited by
- 1,354
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 61.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.