The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stroop interference: Aging effects assessed with the stroop color-word test
Open accessAbstract
A large, cross-sectional aging investigation of performance on the Stroop Color-Word Test (SCWT) was carried out. Subjects were 247 volunteers, ages 20-80 in seven age levels. Although all subjects thought themselves to be normal and healthy, a post hoc division could be made on the basis of biological life events (BLE). BLE are mild biological or environmental factors, such as repeated experiences of general anesthesia, that can hamper optimal brain functioning. Apart from the anticipated age effects, performance was poorer in subjects who had experienced one or more BLE: The slowing due to BLE was comparable to the effect of age, especially on the task involving language interference in color-naming. Education had a significant effect on performance: More highly educated subjects performed better than less educated subjects. No sex differences were observed. These findings replicate observations made with other tests in parallel studies. They are also in line with several other studies reporting interactions between the effects of aging and physical fitness. This study questions some of the validity of cognitive aging research, as our data suggest that screening for BLE as age-extrinsic factors in nondiseased subjects can reduce many of the performance deficits usually ascribed to aging per se.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
Charness, N. (2008) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872008x312161 · Cited by 247
Effects of Lunch on Selective and Sustained Attention
Smith, A. P., & Miles, C. (2008) · Neuropsychobiology · doi:10.1159/000118309 · Cited by 74
Cited by
Adult age differences in task switching.
Kray, J., & Lindenberger, U. (2000) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.15.1.126 · Cited by 691
Cognitive dysfunction 1–2 years after non‐cardiac surgery in the elderly
Abildstrom, H., Rasmussen, L. S., Rentowl, P., Hanning, C. D., Rasmussen, H., Kristensen, P. A., Moller, J. T., & the ISPOCD group (2000) · Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1034/j.1399-6576.2000.441010.x · Cited by 393
Differences in the functional neuroanatomy of inhibitory control across the adult life span.
Nielson, K. A., Langenecker, S. A., & Garavan, H. (2002) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037//0882-7974.17.1.56 · Cited by 386
VAN DER ELST, W., VAN BOXTEL, M. P. J., VAN BREUKELEN, G. J. P., & JOLLES, J. (2006) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617706060115 · Cited by 334
Self-citationAging and the Stroop effect: A meta-analysis.
Verhaeghen, P., & Meersman, L. D. (1998) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037//0882-7974.13.1.120 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Houx, P. J., Jolles, J., & Vreeling, F. W.
- Venue
- Experimental Aging Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1993-07
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 209-224
- ISSN
- 0361-073X (ISSN-L)
- 1096-4657
- OpenAlex
- W2141515772
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stroop interference: Aging effects assessed with the stroop color-word test. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03610739308253934
- The paper
- Houx, P. J., Jolles, J., & Vreeling, F. W. (1993). Stroop interference: Aging effects assessed with the stroop color-word test. Experimental Aging Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610739308253934
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.