Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 393

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognitive dysfunction 1–2 years after non‐cardiac surgery in the elderly

Open access
Abildstrom, H., Rasmussen, L. S., Rentowl, P., Hanning, C. D., Rasmussen, H., Kristensen, P. A., Moller, J. T., the ISPOCD group·2000·Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Background: Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is a well‐recognised complication of cardiac surgery, but evidence of POCD after general surgery has been lacking. We recently showed that POCD was present in 9.9% of elderly patients 3 months after major non‐cardiac surgery. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether POCD persists for 1–2 years after operation. Methods: A total of 336 elderly patients (median age 69 years, range 60–86) was studied after major surgery under general anesthesia. Psychometric testing was performed before surgery and at a median of 7, 98 and 532 days postoperatively using a neuropsychological test battery with 7 subtests. A control group of 47 non‐hospitalised volunteers of similar age were tested with the test battery at the same intervals. Results: 1–2 years after surgery, 35 out of 336 patients (10.4%, CI: 7.2–13.7%) had cognitive dysfunction. Three patients had POCD at all three postoperative test sessions (0.9%). From our definition of POCD, there is only a 1:64 000 likelihood that a single subject would have POCD at all three test points by chance. Logistic regression analysis identified age, early POCD, and infection within the first three postoperative months as significant risk factors for long‐term cognitive dysfunction. Five of 47 normal controls fulfilled the criteria for cognitive dysfunction 1–2 years after initial testing (10.6%, CI: 1.8–19.4%), i.e. a similar incidence of age‐related cognitive impairment as among patients. Conclusion: POCD is a reversible condition in the majority of cases but may persist in approximately 1% of patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2000.441010.x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 393

Metadata

Authors
Abildstrom, H., Rasmussen, L. S., Rentowl, P., Hanning, C. D., Rasmussen, H., Kristensen, P. A., Moller, J. T., & the ISPOCD group
Venue
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-11
Volume
44
Issue
10
Pages
1246-1251
ISSN
  • 0001-5172 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-6576
OpenAlex
W1993911593
Cited by
393
References
13
FWCI
7.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive dysfunction 1–2 years after non‐cardiac surgery in the elderly. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1399-6576.2000.441010.x
The paper
Abildstrom, H., Rasmussen, L. S., Rentowl, P., Hanning, C. D., Rasmussen, H., Kristensen, P. A., Moller, J. T., & the ISPOCD group. (2000). Cognitive dysfunction 1–2 years after non‐cardiac surgery in the elderly. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-6576.2000.441010.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.