Cited by 691Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive Functions and Memory

Adult age differences in task switching.

Open access
Kray, Jutta, Lindenberger, Ulman·2000·Psychology and Aging

Abstract

Age differences in 2 components of task-set switching speed were investigated in 118 adults aged 20 to 80 years using task-set homogeneous (e.g., AAAA... ) and task-set heterogeneous (e.g., AABBAABB... ) blocks.General switch costs were defined as latency differences between heterogeneous and homogeneous blocks, whereas specific switch costs were defined as differences between switch and nonswitch trials within heterogeneous blocks.Both types of costs generalized over verbal, figural, and numeric stimulus materials; were more highly correlated to fluid than to crystallized abilities; and were not eliminated after 6 sessions of practice, indicating that they reflect basic and domain-general aspects of cognitive control.Most important, age-associated increments in costs were significantly greater for general than for specific switch costs, suggesting that the ability to efficiently maintain and coordinate 2 alternating task sets in working memory instead of 1 is more negatively affected by advancing age than the ability to execute the task switch itself.Cognitive control processes are generally seen as responsible for the regulation and organization of behavioral activity (Baddeley, 1986;Norman & Shallice, 1986).Influenced by the neuropsychological research tradition, developmental researchers have become increasingly interested in the role of cognitive control processes for the regulation of behavior and in their relationship to agerelated decrements in fluid intelligence or the mechanics of cognition (e.g., Baltes, 1993).Theoretical considerations about aging models of cognitive control are dominated by the frontal lobe hypothesis of aging, which assumes that age-related decline in intellectual functioning is associated with age-based changes in the frontal lobe (Dempster, 1992;Duncan, 1995; Prull, Gabrieli, & Bunge, in press).This line of thinking has been primarily influenced by clinical observations of behavioral deficits in frontal lobe patients (Reitan & Wolfson, 1994;Shallice & Burgess, 1993;Tranel, Anderson, & Benton, 1994).Deficits in frontal lobe patients were observed with psychometric tests assumed to require

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0882-7974.15.1.126

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence supporting the compensation account comes from numerous EF training studies revealing that training-related benefits were larger in children and older adults than in younger adults.

    “Evidence supporting the compensation account comes from numerous studies focusing on EF training, revealing that training-related benefits were larger in children and older adults than in younger adults”

    From Executive control training from middle childhood to adolescence (2014) · cites this paper as Kray and Lindenberger, 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kray, J., & Lindenberger, U.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Venue
Psychology and Aging
Published
2000
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
126-147
ISSN
  • 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1498
OpenAlex
W2060107738
Cited by
691
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 44
FWCI
7.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
task switching, age differences, cognitive aging, switch costs, fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, cognitive control, working memory, practice effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aging, Analysis of Variance, Cognition, Color Perception, Female, Form Perception, Humans, Individuality, Intelligence, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Task Performance and Analysis, Models, Statistical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review