The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selection of Working Correlation Structure and Best Model in GEE Analyses of Longitudinal Data
Abstract
The Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) method is one of the most commonly used statistical methods for the analysis of longitudinal data in epidemiological studies. A working correlation structure for the repeated measures of the outcome variable of a subject needs to be specified by this method. However, statistical criteria for selecting the best correlation structure and the best subset of explanatory variables in GEE are only available recently because the GEE method is developed on the basis of quasi-likelihood theory. Maximum likelihood based model selection methods, such as the widely used Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), are not applicable to GEE directly. Pan (2001 Pan , W. ( 2001 ). Akaike's information criterion in generalized estimating equations . Biometrics 57 : 120 – 125 .[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) proposed a selection method called QIC which can be used to select the best correlation structure and the best subset of explanatory variables. Based on the QIC method, we developed a computing program to calculate the QIC value for a range of different distributions, link functions and correlation structures. This program was written in Stata software. In this article, we introduce this program and demonstrate how to use it to select the most parsimonious model in GEE analyses of longitudinal data through several representative examples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications.
Hastings, W. K. (1970) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 · Cited by 15,195
Fitzmaurice, G. M., Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (2011) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119513469 · Cited by 4,639
Quasi-likelihood functions, generalized linear models, and the Gauss—Newton method
WEDDERBURN, R. W. M. (1974) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/61.3.439 · Cited by 2,122
Generalized Estimating Equations
Hardin, J. W., & Hilbe, J. M. (2002) · doi:10.1201/9781420035285 · Cited by 1,766
Cited by
Fixed effects, random effects and GEE: What are the differences?
Gardiner, J. C., Luo, Z., & Roman, L. A. (2009) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.3478 · Cited by 434
Generalized Estimating Equations in Longitudinal Data Analysis: A Review and Recent Developments
Wang, M. (2014) · Advances in Statistics · doi:10.1155/2014/303728 · Cited by 313
Maulik, P. K., Eaton, W. W., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2011) · The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research · doi:10.1007/s11414-009-9205-z · Cited by 93
Free establishment of primary health care providers: effects on geographical equity
Isaksson, D., Blomqvist, P., & Winblad, U. (2015) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1259-z · Cited by 81
Cloos, J.-M., Bocquet, V., Rolland-Portal, I., Koch, P., & Chouinard, G. (2015) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000434755 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Cui, J., & Qian, G.
- Venue
- Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-08-28
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 987-996
- ISSN
- 0361-0918 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-4141
- OpenAlex
- W1988216092
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selection of Working Correlation Structure and Best Model in GEE Analyses of Longitudinal Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03610910701539617
- The paper
- Cui, J., & Qian, G. (2007). Selection of Working Correlation Structure and Best Model in GEE Analyses of Longitudinal Data. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610910701539617
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.