The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Impact of Mobile Phone Usage on Student Learning
Abstract
In this study, we examined the impact of mobile phone usage, during class lecture, on student learning. Participants in three different study groups (control, low-distraction, and high-distraction) watched a video lecture, took notes on that lecture, and took two learning assessments after watching the lecture. Students who were not using their mobile phones wrote down 62% more information in their notes, took more detailed notes, were able to recall more detailed information from the lecture, and scored a full letter grade and a half higher on a multiple choice test than those students who were actively using their mobile phones. Theoretical and pedagogical implications are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Students in the non-multitasking control group wrote down 62% more information, took notes with more details, were able to recall more detailed information, and scored a full letter grade and a half higher than students in the low-distraction and high-distraction groups.”
From Efficient, helpful, or distracting? A literature review of media multitasking in relation to academic performance (2018) · cites this paper as Kuznekoff & Titsworth, 2013
In the citing paper
“and interference with note-taking (End et al., 2010;Kuznekoff & Titsworth, 2013).”
From The consequences of media multitasking for youth: A review (2015) · cites this paper as Kuznekoff & Titsworth, 2013
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship
boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x · Cited by 16,251
Judd, C. H. (1928) · Journal of Education · doi:10.1177/002205742810700706 · Cited by 1,410
Examining the impact of off-task multi-tasking with technology on real-time classroom learning
Wood, E., Zivcakova, L., Gentile, P., Archer, K., De Pasquale, D., & Nosko, A. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.029 · Cited by 565
Harbluk, J. L., Noy, Y. I., Trbovich, P. L., & Eizenman, M. (2007) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2006.08.013 · Cited by 526
Note-taking functions and techniques.
Kiewra, K. A., DuBois, N. F., Christian, D., McShane, A., Meyerhoffer, M., & Roskelley, D. (1991) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.2.240 · Cited by 331
A decrease in brain activation associated with driving when listening to someone speak
Just, M. A., Keller, T. A., & Cynkar, J. (2008) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.12.075 · Cited by 298
Learners as information processors: Legacies and limitations of educational psychology's second..
Mayer, R. E. (1996) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.1996.9653263 · Cited by 285
(2009) · Issue Lab (Candid) · Cited by 269
Perceptions of Mobile Phones in College Classrooms: Ringing, Cheating, and Classroom Policies
Campbell, S. W. (2006) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634520600748573 · Cited by 261
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Skenazy , L. 2009 , February 9 . Smartphone apps great for marketing, bad for social skills . Advertising Age . Retrieved from http://adage.com
- Smith , A. 2011 . Americans and text messaging: 31% of text message users prefer texting to voice calls, and young adults stand out in their use of text messaging . Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 416
Student perceptions of digital distraction prevention and student–instructor rapport
Flanigan, A. E., Hosek, A. M., Frisby, B. N., Babchuk, W. A., & Ray, E. (2022) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634523.2022.2149828 · Cited by 24
“…digital distraction habits contribute to a variety of negative outcomes for students, including reduced note-taking (Flanigan & Titsworth, 2020; Kuzneko ff & Titsworth, 2013), performance on quizzes based on lecture content (Demirbilek & Talan, 2018; Flanigan & Titsworth, 2020), course grades…”
BackgroundSmart objects in education: An early survey to assess opportunities and challenges
Domínguez, F., & Ochôa, X. (2017) · International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment · doi:10.1109/icedeg.2017.7962537 · Cited by 20
“distractions into the classroom [33] and, when using IoT for exploratory learning, they also fear that measured results will differ from theory and therefore introduce uncertainty in the learning process [34].”
BackgroundThe Effect of Cell Phones on Attention and Learning in Nursing Students
Gutiérrez‐Puertas, L., Márquez‐Hernández, V. V., Gutiérrez‐Puertas, V., Gámez, G. G., & Aguilera‐Manrique, G. (2020) · CIN Computers Informatics Nursing · doi:10.1097/cin.0000000000000626 · Cited by 27
“Along the same lines, several studies report that the use of cell phones for multiple activities while in class diminishes students' attention.(34,35) Additionally, several different studies have shown that the use of cell phones”
BackgroundThe impact of goal achievement orientation on student technology usage in the classroom
McGloin, R., McGillicuddy, K. T., & Christensen, J. L. (2017) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-017-9134-4 · Cited by 27
“Yet, the presence of technology may also have a negative influence on a student’s academic performance (Kraushaar and Novak 2006; Kuznekoff and Titsworth 2013; Sana et al. 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialOZER, O. (2020) · Journal of Computer and Education Research · doi:10.18009/jcer.696481 · Cited by 25
Learning approach and its relationship to type of media use and frequency of media-multitasking
Law, A. S., & Stock, R. (2017) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787417735612 · Cited by 21
GAMIFICATION IN ACCOUNTING AND STUDENTS’ SKILLSET
Durso, S. D. O., Reginato, L., & Cornacchione, E. B. (2020) · Advances in Scientific and Applied Accounting · doi:10.14392/asaa.2019120305 · Cited by 29
“Nowadays, educators compete for students’ attention with many other things inside classroom (Kuznekoff & Titsworth, 2013).”
BackgroundImpact of Media on Major Choice: Survey of Communication Undergraduates
Hoag, A. M., Grant, A. E., & Carpenter, S. (2017) · NACADA Journal · doi:10.12930/nacada-15-040 · Cited by 18
“For example, Kuznekoff and Titsworth (2013) discovered a connection between high mobile phone use and lower measures of student learning.”
BackgroundMobile phones as a learning tool: a lecturer’s viewpoint
Ahmad, T. (2018) · Society and Business Review · doi:10.1108/sbr-03-2018-0021 · Cited by 18
Afutu‐Kotey, R. L., & Gough, K. V. (2019) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2019.102487 · Cited by 18
Kassem, M. A. M. (2018) · Journal of Language Teaching and Research · doi:10.17507/jltr.0902.05 · Cited by 18
“The possibility of students' distraction by play games, text messages and checking social websites worries teachers (Kuznekoff & Titsworth, 2013).”
BackgroundChiang, Z. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132111910 · Cited by 17
“The problem of using mobile phones in the course still affected the students’ engagement, as Kuznekoffc and Titsworth (2013) found [28].”
BackgroundHaverkamp, Y. E., Bråten, I., Latini, N., & Strømsø, H. I. (2024) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2024.102271 · Cited by 17
“…simulated or actual lectures have learned less lecture content than students not engaged in such media multitasking (e.g., Conard & Marsh, 2014; Kuznekoff & Titsworth, 2013; Rosen, Lim, Carrier, & Cheever, 2011; Sana, Weston, & Cepeda, 2013; Waite, Lind-berg, Ernst, Bowman, & Levine, 2018;…”
BackgroundThe effect of mobile phone usage policy on college students’ learning
Sumuer, E. (2021) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-020-09265-9 · Cited by 15
Peers and Instructors as Sources of Distraction from a Cognitive Load Perspective
Frisby, B. N., Sexton, B. T., Buckner, M. M., Beck, A.-C., & Kaufmann, R. (2018) · International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning · doi:10.20429/ijsotl.2018.120206 · Cited by 21
Mobile-Assisted Language Learning and Its Effects on Learners’ Speaking Development
Aliakbari, M., & Mardani, M. (2022) · Education Research International · doi:10.1155/2022/9043326 · Cited by 16
Students’ Attitude towards the Sustainable Use of Mobile Technologies in Higher Education
Mâță, L., Clipa, O., Cojocariu, V.-M., Robu, V., Dobrescu, T., Hervás-Gómez, C., & Stoica, I. V. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13115923 · Cited by 16
“Kuznekoff and Titsworth [19] examined the impact of mobile phone usage during a class lecture on student learning in three different study groups (control, low-distraction and high-distraction).”
BackgroundReducing adolescent cell phone usage using an interdependent group contingency
Jones, M. E., Allday, R. A., & Givens, A. (2019) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.538 · Cited by 16
Online Education: A Learner’s Perspective During COVID-19
Garg, A. (2020) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation · doi:10.1177/2319510x211013594 · Cited by 19
“Multitasking during academic activities also affects learning (Bowman et al., 2015; Kuznekoff & Titsworth, 2013).”
BackgroundThe impact of mindfulness interventions in higher education to enhance engagement
Hammill, J., Nguyen, T. B., & Henderson, F. (2023) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2023.2175652 · Cited by 15
“This leads to poor understanding of the course content (Kuznekoff and Titsworth 2013), weakens learning outcomes (Mercimek, Akbulut, and Sak 2020) and negatively affects class engagement (Jamet et al. 2020).”
BackgroundSocial Media Usage and The Academic Performance of Filipino Junior High School Students
Dimacangun, F. E., & Guillena, J. B. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies · doi:10.53378/352994 · Cited by 24
“Additionally, Kuznekoff and Titsworth (2013) demonstrated that mobile phone usage during class time, which often includes social media engagement, negatively affects student learning and academic performance.”
Background“I Have an iPad. Now What?” Using Mobile Devices in University Physical Education Programs
Rosenthal, M. B., & Eliason, S. (2015) · Journal of Physical Education Recreation & Dance · doi:10.1080/07303084.2015.1053636 · Cited by 15
“Evidence suggests that texting and messaging during class can negatively affect attention by distracting other students and the instructor (Kuznekoff & Titsworth, 2013).”
BackgroundBerger, P. (2017) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.07.009 · Cited by 15
Mobile phones in the classroom: Policies and potential pedagogy
Morris, P. L., & Sarapin, S. H. (2020) · Journal of Media Literacy Education · doi:10.23860/jmle-2020-12-1-5 · Cited by 15
“Kuznekoff and Titsworth (2013) reported, “students who use their mobile phones during class lectures tend to write down less information, recall less information, and perform worse on a multiple-choice test than those students who abstain from using their mobile phones during class” (p. 251).”
BackgroundVision, Mission, and Technology Implementation: Going One-to-One in a Catholic School
Cho, V. (2017) · Catholic education/Catholic education (Dayton, Ohio. Online) · doi:10.15365/joce.2002082017 · Cited by 16
“Digital devices would seem to be everywhere in students’ academic, social, and personal lives—sometimes with unintended or negative consequences (Kuznekoff & Titsworth, 2013; Turkle, 2011; Uhls et al., 2014).”
BackgroundPerspectivas e experiências docentes na FEA-USP
Viana, A. B. N., Ximenes, A. C., Carvalhal, F., Yamamoto, I., & Pardim, V. I. (2023) · doi:10.11606/9788561522063 · Cited by 14
Effects of Live Lecture Attendance on the Academic Achievement of Preclinical Medical Students
Wongtrakul, W., & Dangprapai, Y. (2020) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-020-01068-y · Cited by 14
Reforming the Environment: The Influence of the Roundtable Classroom Design on Interactive Learning
Parsons, C. S. (2017) · Journal of learning spaces · Cited by 14
Undergraduate mobile phone use in the Caribbean
Ahmad, T. (2019) · Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning · doi:10.1108/jrit-01-2019-0001 · Cited by 14
Kancharla, K., Kanagaraj, S., & Gopal, C. N. R. (2022) · Biomedical & Pharmacology Journal · doi:10.13005/bpj/2555 · Cited by 18
Addiction to smartphones leading to distraction in the classrooms: Effect of different cultures
Mahsud, M., Khalaf, A. J. M., Mahsud, Z., Afzal, A., & Afzal, F. (2020) · Journal of Statistics and Management Systems · doi:10.1080/09720510.2020.1834660 · Cited by 13
Managing in-lecture media use: the feasibility and value of a split-class policy
Parry, D. A., Roux, D., & Cornelissen, L. A. (2019) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-019-09232-z · Cited by 13
Olin‐Scheller, C., Tanner, M., Asplund, S.-B., Kontio, J., & Wikström, P. (2020) · Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00313831.2020.1739132 · Cited by 13
Secondary school teachers’ perceptions of BYOD among learners within the classroom
Mawere, T., Manjeese, C., & Chigada, J. (2022) · South African Computer Journal · doi:10.18489/sacj.v34i1.952 · Cited by 13
“Past literature has asserted the positive impact that mobile technologies proffers to student learning (Dolan, 2016; Hughes et al., 2015; Kuznekoff & Titsworth, 2013; Martins & Baptista Nunes, 2016; Raghunath et al., 2018; Slakmon, 2017).”
BackgroundMobile Phone Multitasking and Learning
Carrillo, R., & Subrahmanyam, K. (2015) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-8239-9.ch007 · Cited by 14
“Studies by Gingerich and Lineweaver (2014) and by Kuznekoff and Titsworth (2013) found a negative effect of multitasking with mobile phones.”
BackgroundKang, E. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000412 · Cited by 32
Mobile Assisted Language Learning in Saudi EFL Classrooms: Effectiveness, Perception, and Attitude
Alkhudair, R. Y. (2020) · Theory and Practice in Language Studies · doi:10.17507/tpls.1012.16 · Cited by 14
“A further study conducted by Kuznekoff and Titsworth (2013) which was designed to discover the influence of using mobile phones during lectures on the students' achievement.”
BackgroundBrunow, D. A., & Cullen, T. A. (2021) · Computers in the Schools · doi:10.1080/07380569.2021.1953362 · Cited by 14
“…variety of new challenges in many classrooms that were not present in earlier decades due to changing student demographics, ways in which information is gathered, technological refinement, and ways in which students communicate with others (Kuznekoff & Titsworth, 2013; Robb & Shellenbarger, 2012).”
BackgroundDrew, C., & Mann, A. (2018) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-018-0125-y · Cited by 11
Fichten, C. S., Jorgensen, M., King, L. H., Havel, A., Heiman, T., Olenik‐Shemesh, D., & Kaspi-Tsahor, D. (2019) · International Research in Higher Education · doi:10.5430/irhe.v4n3p35 · Cited by 11
“…of cautions in the literature about the negative impact on grades and learning as a result of multitasking during lectures (Hammer et al., 2010; Kuznekoff & Titsworth, 2013; Wood et al., 2011), students both in Israel (Malka, Ariel, Avidar, & Chen Levy, 2014) and Canada generally embrace the…”
BackgroundGezgin, D. M., & Kurtça, T. T. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107962 · Cited by 13
Owning ICT: Student Use and Ownership of Technology
Gulatee, Y., & Combes, B. (2017) · Walailak Journal of Science and Technology (WJST) · doi:10.48048/wjst.2018.2868 · Cited by 11
Miller, M., Doherty, J. J., Butler, N. M., & Coull, W. G. (2020) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3662 · Cited by 11
Wei, F. F., & Hendrix, K. G. (2016) · Qualitative Research Reports in Communication · doi:10.1080/17459435.2016.1220419 · Cited by 11
Asplund, S.-B., & Kontio, J. (2020) · Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training · doi:10.3384/njvet.2242-458x.2010165 · Cited by 14
Do More Than Join–Engage Deeply With PSI CHI
Landrum, R. E. (2017) · Eye on Psi Chi Magazine · doi:10.24839/2164-9812.eye22.1.4 · Cited by 11
Graben, K., Doering, B. K., & Barke, A. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100170 · Cited by 10
Exploring BYOD Usage in the Classroom and Policies
Santos, I. M., & Bocheco, O. (2016) · International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education · doi:10.4018/ijicte.2016100105 · Cited by 10
Classroom Attention Restoration Using Computer Game Rewarding Mechanism
Xiao, S., Liang, W., & Tang, Y. (2018) · International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE) · doi:10.1109/iccse.2018.8468797 · Cited by 10
“Modern studies such as [16], [17], and [18] confirm student attention is declining under the influence of the Internet and mobile phones.”
BackgroundMortazavi, M., Hocanın, F. T., & Davarpanah, A. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12208345 · Cited by 9
A mixed-methods approach to understanding laptop-free zones in college classrooms
Fletcher, K. A., & Stanzione, C. M. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104253 · Cited by 9
PISA 2022 Financial Literacy Framework
OECD (2023) · Programme for international student assessment/Internationale Schulleistungsstudie · doi:10.1787/b5659b4f-en · Cited by 12
Şumuer, E., Gezgin, D., & Yıldırım, S. (2018) · Sakarya University Journal of Education · doi:10.19126/suje.378459 · Cited by 10
Is the smart mobile phone transforming university educational reality?
Villena-Martínez, M. D., Pérez-García, P., & Muñoz-García, A. (2020) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2019.1707694 · Cited by 9
Formal and Informal Learning Using Mobile Technology
Elsafi, A. (2017) · Perspectives on rethinking and reforming education · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-6144-8_11 · Cited by 9
Microblog use and student engagement in the large-classroom setting.
Saperstein, A. K., Ledford, C. J. W., Servey, J. T., Cafferty, L. A., McClintick, S. H., & Bernstein, E. (2015) · PubMed · Cited by 9
Jia, P., Chen, S., Fu, C., & Li, T. (2025) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjaf048 · Cited by 8
Understanding and Reacting to the Digital Distraction Phenomenon in College Classrooms
Flanigan, A. E., Babchuk, W. A., & Kim, J. H. (2022) · Advances in higher education and professional development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-9243-4.ch001 · Cited by 8
Graben, K., Doering, B. K., & Barke, A. (2021) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10764-0 · Cited by 11
“With regard to the existing research (Conard & Marsh, 2014; Karpinski et al., 2013; Kuznekoff & Titsworth, 2013; Oulasvirta & Saariluoma, 2004; Rosen et al., 2013), it is unexpected that no significant difference was found between the group that could read the text without distraction and the group…”
BackgroundResultEffects of IELTS reading education by using new media learning environments effectively
Liu, X., & Pei, J. (2021) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2021.1990086 · Cited by 8
Letting Smartphones at Class Times: Does It Matter in Learning Process?
Kara, S. (2020) · International Journal of Social Sciences and Educational Studies · doi:10.23918/ijsses.v7i1p78 · Cited by 8
Michinov, N., & Hutain, J. (2023) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/14697874231176987 · Cited by 8
“In this context, the primary undesired effects of laptop use during lectures are distraction and multitasking (Fried, 2008; Ravizza et al., 2014), and this use interferes with learning (Kuznekoff and Titsworth, 2013; Rosen et al., 2011).”
García, S. C., Montserrat, M. E. R. A., & Núñez, J. A. I. (1970) · Communication & Society · doi:10.15581/003.32.1.199-211 · Cited by 10
The Future Use of Technology in Education and Learning in the Commonwealth
Unwin, T. (2019) · The Round Table · doi:10.1080/00358533.2019.1634891 · Cited by 9
“Although much of this is anecdotal, a growing body of research suggests that many students do indeed perform better in the absence of such devices (Kuzneko ff and Titsworth, 2013; Beland and Murphy, 2015).”
Broeckelman-Post, M. A., & MacArthur, B. L. (2017) · Journalism & Mass Communication Educator · doi:10.1177/1077695817736687 · Cited by 8
“Existing research that shows that students who use mobile devices during class take fewer notes, are less able to recall detailed information, and tend to score lower on tests than students who do not use cell phones in class (Kuznekoff & Titsworth, 2013).”
BackgroundVedechkina, M., & Borgonovi, F. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/vjsuw · Cited by 8
Flanigan, A. E., Brady, A. C., Akcaoğlu, M., Dai, Y., Won, S., Daleiden, B. K., & Hartley, K. (2025) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101023 · Cited by 11
Ak, N. Y., & Yıldırım, S. (2024) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-023-09723-0 · Cited by 8
“This result suggests that while mobile phones can serve as leisure devices, their role in enhancing academic engagement and achievement is nuanced (Kuznekoff & Titsworth, 2013).”
Tang, X., Shen, Z., Khan, M. I., & Wang, Q. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1474340 · Cited by 12
McBurnett, B. G. (2019) · ACS symposium series · doi:10.1021/bk-2019-1318.ch012 · Cited by 7
Muscarinic M1, but not M4, receptor antagonism impairs divided attention in male rats
Nicklas, P., Kiefer, M. L., Whalen, M., Stewart, M., Mosura, D. E., Bennett, E. M., Hawley, W. R., & McLaughlin, P. J. (2021) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2021.173184 · Cited by 7
The Relationship between Smartphone Addiction and Academic Performance in College Students
Damiao, J. A., & Cavaliere, C. (2021) · Global Journal of Health Science · doi:10.5539/gjhs.v13n9p10 · Cited by 9
Learning behavior in augmented reality–mediated mobile game–based learning
Yu, Y.-L., Wu, T., & Huang, Y. (2022) · Library Hi Tech · doi:10.1108/lht-03-2022-0122 · Cited by 7
Penggunaan Handphone dan Dampaknya bagi Aktivitas Belajar
Nuraliyah, E., Fadilah, A., Handayaningsih, E., Ernawati, E., & Oktadriani, S. L. (2022) · Ideas Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial dan Budaya · doi:10.32884/ideas.v8i4.961 · Cited by 7
“…bagi banyak guru adalah gangguan yang disebabkan oleh siswa yang menggunakan perangkat seluler mereka untuk mengirim pesan teks, bermain game, memeriksa Facebook, atau terlibat dalam aktivitas lain yang tersedia bagi mereka di media digital yang berkembang pesat (Kuznekoff & Titsworth, 2013).”
BackgroundAn Experimental Examination of Students’ Attitudes Toward Classroom Cell Phone Policies
Lancaster, A. L., & Goodboy, A. K. (2015) · Communication Research Reports · doi:10.1080/08824096.2014.989977 · Cited by 7
“…ow nl oa de d by [ W es t V ir gi ni a U ni ve rs ity ] at 0 5: 40 1 3 Ja nu ar y 20 15 consider because students who use their mobile devices in class take less-detailed notes, recall less lecture information, and receive lower scores on exams (Kuznekoff & Titsworth, 2013).”
BackgroundUsing a health care practice framework to address smartphone use in the classroom
Pistilli, N., & Cain, J. J. (2016) · Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2015.12.020 · Cited by 10
Organizational problem solving around digital distraction
Cho, V. (2016) · Journal of Professional Capital and Community · doi:10.1108/jpcc-11-2015-0009 · Cited by 7
Salisbury, L., Omolewu, A. O., & Smith, J. J. (2018) · Science & Technology Libraries · doi:10.1080/0194262x.2018.1456391 · Cited by 8
“In a study on the impact of mobile phone usage on student learning, Kuznekoff and Titsworth (2013) concluded that students who were not using their mobile phones wrote down 62 percent more information in their notes, took more detailed notes, recalled more detailed information, and earned a full…”
BackgroundResultMavali, S., Yoon, D., Sinnamon, L. S., & Fels, S. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3641985 · Cited by 6
“A study by Kuznekof et al. [24] found a signifcant diference in learning between the control and high-distraction groups with the students in the control group writing down 62% more information in their notes and scoring 1.5 letter grades higher.”
InfluentialThapa, P. P., Zayed, N. M., Alam, M. N., Nitsenko, V. S., Руденко, С., & Svyrydenko, D. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-07661-x · Cited by 6
“The relationship is grounded in the AC (Cownie, 2019; Meyer et al., 1993) imposed by mindful MPU, which engages students emotionally and influences their willingness to engage in aca - demic activities (Calderón-Garrido et al., 2022 ; Kuznekoff & Titsworth, 2013).”
InfluentialThe teachers' ban or permission of smartphone use in Algerian secondary school classrooms
Cherif, K. M., Azzouz, L., Bendania, A., & Djaballah, S. (2024) · Educational Dimension · doi:10.55056/ed.727 · Cited by 8
“Similarly, Kuznekoff and Titsworth [23] found that students who were not allowed to use phones in class actually used them more discreetly, disrupting their focus.”
BackgroundLedford, C. J. W., Saperstein, A. K., Cafferty, L. A., McClintick, S. H., & Bernstein, E. (2015) · Communication Teacher · doi:10.1080/17404622.2014.1003309 · Cited by 6
“This introduces the potential for both digital divide disparities (Enoch & Soker, 2006) and previously established negative effects of mobile device use in the classroom (Kuznekoff & Titsworth, 2013; Wei et al., 2012).”
BackgroundSantos, I. M., Bocheco, O., Vizzotto, L., & Moro, E. J. (2020) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-020-00559-4 · Cited by 6
“For example, Kuznekoff and Titsoworth (2013) found that texting in class decreased the number of notes taken by students, affecting their performance on different types of tests.”
BackgroundSugianto, H., Suyitno, A., & Asih, T. S. N. (2022) · JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika) · doi:10.33603/jnpm.v6i1.6264 · Cited by 6
The Effects of Chromebook Use on Student Engagement
Albataineh, M., Warren, B., & Al-Bataineh, A. (2024) · International journal of technology in education and science · doi:10.46328/ijtes.530 · Cited by 8
“One study conducted by Kuznekoff and Titsworth (2013) found that students who use their cellular phones during class lectures tend to write down less information, recall less information, and perform worse on a multiple-choice test than those students who abstain from using their phones during…”
BackgroundMoscardo, G. M., & Hughes, K. (2016) · Journal of Leisure Research · doi:10.18666/jlr-2016-v48-i5-7085 · Cited by 6
Mobile devices in the lecture hall: Into it, indifferent, or intrusion?
Hall-Newton, K., Rudkowski, J., Lee, S. H., Hogue, J. V., & Ratnichkina, P. (2019) · Journal of Education for Business · doi:10.1080/08832323.2018.1541853 · Cited by 6
“Some critics argue that the use of mobile devices may diminish social skills, such as effective listening (which is critical to maintaining a positive dynamic within the classroom; Anshari et al., 2017; Kuznekoff & Titsworth, 2013).”
BackgroundFifth graders' perceptions of mobile phones and GIS technology
Gal, A. (2019) · International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) · doi:10.11591/ijere.v8i1.16246 · Cited by 6
Mere Presence of a Cell Phone: Effects on Academic Ability
Boila, V., Kwong, T. E., & Hintz, J. E. (2020) · Behavioural Sciences Undergraduate Journal · doi:10.29173/bsuj492 · Cited by 6
“Unlike the emerging interest in studying other merely present technology, a great deal of research exists on cell phone use in learning environments (e.g., Froese et al., 2012; Harman & Sato, 2011; Kuznekoff & Titsworth, 2013).”
BackgroundBartholomew, S. R. (2021) · Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) · doi:10.26076/2ffe-34db · Cited by 5
Mobile phone distraction and its effects on academic performance of Israeli college students
Albert, G., Fridkin, S., & Delevski, O. (2023) · Israel Affairs · doi:10.1080/13537121.2023.2257472 · Cited by 5
University Students' Perceptions of Personal Mobile Devices in the Classroom and Policies
Santos, I. M., & Bocheco, O. (2017) · Advances in business information systems and analytics book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-2492-2.ch014 · Cited by 5
“It is common knowledge, however, that students’ devices can potentially disrupt lectures (Sharples, 2002), which is a wide shared concern by many instructors (Graham & Gillies, 2016; Kuznekoff & Titsworth, 2013).”
BackgroundA Behavior Analytic Perspective on Treatment of Problem Gaming and Problem Social Media Use
Hassan, M., & Kyonka, E. G. E. (2021) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/s40732-021-00465-y · Cited by 7
“However, there are aspects of using digital technology that have some negative impacts on academic performance (e.g., David et al., 2015; Kuznekoff & Titsworth, 2013), physical fitness (e.g., Mark & Janssen, 2008; Sisson et al., 2010), and psychological well-being (e.g., Cheever et al., 2014; Dhir…”
BackgroundAlonso‐Conde, A. B., Rojo‐Suárez, J., & Vicente, J. (2021) · Revista Tecnología Ciencia y Educación · doi:10.51302/tce.2021.600 · Cited by 7
A Fuzzy-Based Hybrid Approach for Estimating Interdisciplinary Learning Efficiency
Chiang, Z. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3121504 · Cited by 5
“The problem of using mobile phones in the course affects the students engagement, which has also reported previously [42].”
BackgroundKuznekoff, J. H., & Munz, S. M. (2022) · Higher Learning Research Communications · doi:10.18870/hlrc.2022.v12i2.1331 · Cited by 5
Self-citationUnderstanding students' usage of smartphone applications for learning purposes: A case study
Madlala, M., Civilcharran, S., & Singh, U. G. (2020) · International Conference on Advances in Computing and Communication Engineering · doi:10.1109/icacce49060.2020.9154920 · Cited by 5
“Kuznekoff and Titsworth [12] suggests that students who are accustomed to using their mobile devices during lectures are inclined to write down far less notes, recollect less information, and performed poorly in tests than students who did not use their mobile devices during lectures.”
BackgroundOng’ong’a, D. O. (2021) · European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education · doi:10.30935/ejimed/9360 · Cited by 5
“Consequently, the findings support the works of Kritzinger and Padayachee (2013), and Kuznekoff and Titsworth (2013) on the teacher’s knowledge and skills of online challenges.”
ResultDİJİTAL ÇELİNME: BİR KAVRAM ÇALIŞMASI
Kurt, A. A., KÜÇÜK, B., BOYNUKARA, M., & Odabaşı, H. F. (2021) · Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama · doi:10.17943/etku.691399 · Cited by 5
Ubiquitous Technologies and Learning
Adjin-Tettey, T. D., Selormey, D., & Nkansah, H. A. (2021) · International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education · doi:10.4018/ijicte.286758 · Cited by 5
“Social media could distract learning occurring in the classroom (Kuznekoff & Titsworth, 2013; Sana, Weston & Cepeda, 2013).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuznekoff, J. H., & Titsworth, S.
- Affiliations
- Ohio University (US)
- Scripps College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kuznekoff, Jeffrey H.
- Venue
- Communication Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-02-12
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 233-252
- ISSN
- 0363-4523 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-5795
- OpenAlex
- W2150206099
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 63.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Communication Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Educational Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Keywords
- mobile phone use, student learning, lecture notes, note-taking, distraction, video lectures, memory retrieval, multiple-choice test performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review