Cited by 417Mobile Learning in EducationInnovations in Educational MethodsVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Impact of Mobile Phone Usage on Student Learning

Kuznekoff, Jeffrey H., Titsworth, Scott·2013·Communication Education

Abstract

In this study, we examined the impact of mobile phone usage, during class lecture, on student learning. Participants in three different study groups (control, low-distraction, and high-distraction) watched a video lecture, took notes on that lecture, and took two learning assessments after watching the lecture. Students who were not using their mobile phones wrote down 62% more information in their notes, took more detailed notes, were able to recall more detailed information from the lecture, and scored a full letter grade and a half higher on a multiple choice test than those students who were actively using their mobile phones. Theoretical and pedagogical implications are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03634523.2013.767917

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Skenazy , L. 2009 , February 9 . Smartphone apps great for marketing, bad for social skills . Advertising Age . Retrieved from http://adage.com
  2. Smith , A. 2011 . Americans and text messaging: 31% of text message users prefer texting to voice calls, and young adults stand out in their use of text messaging . Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 416

Metadata

Authors
Kuznekoff, J. H., & Titsworth, S.
Affiliations
  • Ohio University (US)
  • Scripps College (US)
Corresponding author
Kuznekoff, Jeffrey H.
Venue
Communication Education
Published
2013-02-12
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
233-252
ISSN
  • 0363-4523 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-5795
OpenAlex
W2150206099
Cited by
417
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 4
FWCI
63.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Communication Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Educational Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
mobile phone use, student learning, lecture notes, note-taking, distraction, video lectures, memory retrieval, multiple-choice test performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review