The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A rational analysis of rule-based concept learning
Open accessAbstract
This article proposes a new model of human concept learning that provides a rational analysis of learning feature-based concepts. This model is built upon Bayesian inference for a grammatically structured hypothesis space-a concept language of logical rules. This article compares the model predictions to human generalization judgments in several well-known category learning experiments, and finds good agreement for both average and individual participant generalizations. This article further investigates judgments for a broad set of 7-feature concepts-a more natural setting in several ways-and again finds that the model explains human performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Bayesian models of cognition have primarily flourished as explanations of the complex dependency of behavior on the environment in domains including intuitive physics, causal learning, perception, motor control, and language [1-10]”
From Bayesian Brains without Probabilities (2016) · cites this paper as [7]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1699114 · Cited by 37,192
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Artificial intelligence: a modern approach
Kumar, D. A., Balasubramanian, S., Byeon, D. H., & Manerkar, P. G. V. (1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1577 · Cited by 22,191
Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things
Lakoff, G. P. (1987) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 · Cited by 13,358
Ambrose, A., Wittgenstein, L., & Anscombe, G. E. M. (1954) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.2307/2103745 · Cited by 12,289
Artificial intelligence: A modern approach
Nilsson, N. J. (1996) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(96)00007-0 · Cited by 10,730
Foundations of statistical natural language processing
Manning, C. D., & Schütze, H. (1999) · Cited by 9,816
Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice
Arnaud Doucet, B. (2001) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3437-9 · Cited by 7,516
Probability theory the logic of science
Jaynes, E. T., & Bretthorst, G. L. (2003) · Cited by 4,600
Fodor, J. A. (1975) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,588
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Briscoe E., 2006, Proceedings of the Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1038
- Bruner J. S., 1956, A study of thinking
- Gentner D., 2005, Learning and using relational categories, 151
- Goodman N. D., The probabilistic mind: Prospects for Bayesian cognitive science
- Marr D., 1982, Vision
- Sanborn A., 2006, Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
- Tenenbaum J. B., 2000, Advances in neural information processing systems 12, 59
- Von Humboldt W., 1863, On language
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 470
People Infer Recursive Visual Concepts from Just a Few Examples
Lake, B. M., & Piantadosi, S. T. (2019) · Computational Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1007/s42113-019-00053-y · Cited by 34
Moral empiricism and the bias for act-based rules
Ayars, A., & Nichols, S. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.007 · Cited by 27
Schlegelmilch, R., Wills, A. J., & von Helversen, B. (2021) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000321 · Cited by 26
The Typological Diversity of Morphomes
Herce, B. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192864598.001.0001 · Cited by 26
Hendrickson, A. T., Perfors, A., Navarro, D., & Ransom, K. (2019) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.03.001 · Cited by 29
An Active Inference Approach to Modeling Structure Learning: Concept Learning as an Example Case
Smith, R., Schwartenbeck, P., Parr, T., & Friston, K. J. (2020) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 26
Bayesian Models of Cognition: What's Built in After All?
Perfors, A. (2012) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00467.x · Cited by 25
Cohen, Y., Schneidman, E., & Paz, R. (2021) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.12.027 · Cited by 27
Bayesian learning and the psychology of rule induction
Endress, A. D. (2013) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.014 · Cited by 24
Online learning of symbolic concepts
Thaker, P., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Gershman, S. J. (2017) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2017.01.002 · Cited by 24
Theory Acquisition as Stochastic Search
Ullman, T. D., Goodman, N. D., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2010) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 23
The cultural origins of symbolic number.
O’Shaughnessy, D. M., Gibson, E. A. F., & Piantadosi, S. T. (2021) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000289 · Cited by 28
The acquisition of Boolean concepts
Goodwin, G. P., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.01.007 · Cited by 23
Lloyd, K., Sanborn, A. N., Leslie, D. S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12805 · Cited by 24
Theory Acquisition and the Language of Thought
Kemp, C., Goodman, N. D., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2018) · Figshare · doi:10.1184/r1/6618818 · Cited by 23
Recent Trends in Context Exploitation for Information Fusion and AI
Snidaro, L., Garcı́a, J., Llinas, J., & Blasch, E. (2019) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v40i3.2864 · Cited by 22
Poverty of the Stimulus Without Tears
Pearl, L. (2021) · Language Learning and Development · doi:10.1080/15475441.2021.1981908 · Cited by 22
Summerfield, C. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192843883.001.0001 · Cited by 24
Quantitative mental state attributions in language understanding
Jara‐Ettinger, J., & Rubio‐Fernández, P. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abj0970 · Cited by 21
One-shot generalization in humans revealed through a drawing task
Tiedemann, H., Morgenstern, Y., Schmidt, F., & Fleming, R. W. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.75485 · Cited by 22
Habituation Reflects Optimal Exploration Over Noisy Perceptual Samples
Cao, A., Raz, G., Saxe, R. R., & Frank, M. C. (2022) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12631 · Cited by 20
Palmeri, T. J., & Cottrell, G. W. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195309607.003.0008 · Cited by 21
Yildirim, I., & Jacobs, R. A. (2014) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0734-y · Cited by 24
The Adaptive Markets Hypothesis
Lo, A. W., & Zhang, R. (2024) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199681143.001.0001 · Cited by 23
A Bayesian Model of Rule Induction in Raven's Progressive Matrices
Little, D. R., Lewandowsky, S., & Griffiths, T. L. (2012) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 20
Quantifiers in Natural Language: Efficient Communication and Degrees of Semantic Universals
Steinert‐Threlkeld, S. (2021) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23101335 · Cited by 20
Learning Structured Generative Concepts
Stuhlmüller, A., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Goodman, N. D. (2010) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 20
When Absence of Evidence Is Evidence of Absence: Rational Inferences From Absent Data
Hsu, A., Horng, A., Griffiths, T. L., & Nick Chater, A. (2016) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12356 · Cited by 21
One-shot categorization of novel object classes in humans
Morgenstern, Y., Schmidt, F., & Fleming, R. W. (2019) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2019.09.005 · Cited by 22
Win-Stay, Lose-Sample: A Simple Sequential Algorithm for Approximating Bayesian InferencePreprint
Bonawitz, E. B., Denison, S., Alison Gopnik, C., & Griffiths, T. L. (2018) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/pm4au · Cited by 23
ERUDITE: Human-in-the-Loop IoT for an Adaptive Personalized Learning System
Taherisadr, M., Faruque, M. A. A., & Elmalaki, S. (2023) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3343462 · Cited by 19
Zhu, X., Gibson, B. R., & Rogers, T. T. (2009) · Cited by 19
Can machine learning explain human learning?
Vahdat, M., Oneto, L., Anguita, D., Funk, M., & Matthias Rauterberg, A. (2016) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2015.11.100 · Cited by 19
Coevolution of Lexical Meaning and Pragmatic Use
Brochhagen, T., Franke, M., & van Rooij, R. (2018) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12681 · Cited by 23
Social training reconfigures prediction errors to shape Self-Other boundaries
Ereira, S., Hauser, T. U., Moran, R., Story, G. W., Dolan, R. J., & Kurth-Nelson, Z. L. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16856-8 · Cited by 22
Designing and detecting lies by reasoning about other agents.
Oey, L. A., Schachner, A., & Vul, E. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0001277 · Cited by 19
In praise of folly: flexible goals and human cognition
Chu, J., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Schulz, L. (2024) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2024.03.006 · Cited by 24
Natural language syntax complies with the free-energy principle
Murphy, E., Holmes, E., & Friston, K. J. (2024) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-024-04566-3 · Cited by 24
Structured representations of utility in combinatorial domains.
Gershman, S. J., Malmaud, J., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2016) · Decision · doi:10.1037/dec0000053 · Cited by 18
Limits on Composition of Conceptual Operations in 9‐Month‐Olds
Piantadosi, S. T., Palmeri, H., & Aslin, R. (2018) · Infancy · doi:10.1111/infa.12225 · Cited by 19
An Explanation of the Veridical Uniformity Universal
Steinert‐Threlkeld, S. (2019) · Journal of Semantics · doi:10.1093/jos/ffz019 · Cited by 18
Do Additional Features Help or Hurt Category Learning? The Curse of Dimensionality in Human Learners
Vong, W. K., Hendrickson, A. T., Navarro, D., & Perfors, A. (2019) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12724 · Cited by 20
Hierarchical Learning of Dimensional Biases in Human Categorization
Sanborn, A. N., Nick Chater, A., & Heller, K. (2009) · neural information processing systems · Cited by 18
Learning and the language of thought
Piantadosi, S. T. (2011) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 19
Structure learning enhances concept formation in synthetic Active Inference agents
Neacsu, V., Mirza, M. B., Adams, R. A., & Friston, K. J. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0277199 · Cited by 17
Active inductive inference in children and adults: A constructivist perspective
Bramley, N. R., & Xu, F. (2023) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105471 · Cited by 25
Bayesian validation of grammar productions for the language of thought
Romano, S., Salles, A., Amalric, M., Dehaene, S., Sigman, M., & Figueira, S. D. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200420 · Cited by 16
Nonparametric Bayesian models of categorization
Griffiths, T. L., Sanborn, A. N., Canini, K. R., Navarro, D., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511921322.008 · Cited by 17
Bill, J., Buesing, L., Habenschuss, S., Nessler, B., Maass, W., & Legenstein, R. A. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134356 · Cited by 22
Learning list concepts through program inductionPreprint
Rule, J., Schulz, E., Piantadosi, S. T., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/321505 · Cited by 18
Edwards, D. J., McEnteggart, C., & Barnes‐Holmes, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.745306 · Cited by 21
Beyond discrete-choice options
Rasanan, A. H. H., Evans, N. J., Fontanesi, L., Manning, C., Huang‐Pollock, C. L., Matzke, D., Heathcote, A., Rieskamp, J., Speekenbrink, M., Frank, M. J., et al. (2024) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2024.07.004 · Cited by 19
The Bayesian logic of frequency-based conjunction fallacies
von Sydow, M. (2011) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2010.12.001 · Cited by 16
Symbolic representation of probabilistic worlds
Feldman, J. (2012) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.12.008 · Cited by 16
Solving Bongard Problems with a Visual Language and Pragmatic ReasoningPreprint
Depeweg, S., Rothkopf, C. A., & Jäkel, F. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1804.04452 · Cited by 16
Algorithms of adaptation in inductive inference
Fränken, J.-P., Theodoropoulos, N. C., & Bramley, N. R. (2022) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101506 · Cited by 15
Rusanen, A., & Reijula, S. (2012) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-012-9489-x · Cited by 14
Cross‐Situational Word Learning With Multimodal Neural Networks
Vong, W. K., & Lake, B. M. (2022) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.13122 · Cited by 16
Computing Machinery and Understanding
Ramscar, M. (2010) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01120.x · Cited by 14
Nosofsky, R. M., & Little, D. R. (2010) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.38.7.916 · Cited by 14
Certainty Is Primarily Determined by Past Performance During Concept Learning
Martí, L., Mollica, F., Piantadosi, S. T., & Kidd, C. (2018) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi_a_00017 · Cited by 14
Mashiri, E. (2018) · Unisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa) · Cited by 14
The neural basis of word production
Nozari, N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.013.12 · Cited by 12
Human inference in changing environments with temporal structure.
Prat-Carrabin, A., Wilson, R. C., Cohen, J. D., & Azeredo da Silveira, R. (2021) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000276 · Cited by 16
“The success of particle filters, also known as Sequential Monte Carlo method, in accounting for human behavior in an online inference task adds to a growing literature on sample-based representations in cognitive processes [40, 41, 42, 43].”
BackgroundConstructing a hypothesis space from the Web for large-scale Bayesian word learning.
Abbott, J. T., Austerweil, J. L., & Griffiths, T. L. (2012) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 13
Representing composed meanings through temporal binding
Rabagliati, H., Doumas, L. A. A., & Bemis, D. K. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.013 · Cited by 16
Naïve and Robust: Class‐Conditional Independence in Human Classification Learning
Jarecki, J. B., Meder, B., & Nelson, J. D. (2017) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12496 · Cited by 13
Goldstone, R. L., Kersten, A. W., & Carvalho, P. F. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118133880.hop204022 · Cited by 13
On The Dynamics of Lexical Access In Two or More Languages
Kroll, J. F., Bice, K., Botezatu, M. R., & Zirnstein, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.013.26 · Cited by 13
Saldana, C., Herce, B., & Bickel, B. (2022) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi_a_00062 · Cited by 12
How Do People Generalize Causal Relations over Objects? A Non-parametric Bayesian Account
Zhao, B., Lucas, C. G., & Bramley, N. R. (2021) · Computational Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1007/s42113-021-00124-z · Cited by 12
Logical word learning: The case of kinship
Mollica, F., & Piantadosi, S. T. (2021) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-021-02017-5 · Cited by 12
Preschoolers sample from probability distributions
Denison, S., Bonawitz, E. B., Alison Gopnik, C., & Griffiths, T. L. (2010) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 12
Weitnauer, E., & Ritter, H. J. (2012) · IFIP International Federation for Information Processing/IFIP · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33409-2_17 · Cited by 12
Multitask learning over shared subspaces
Menghi, N., Kacar, K., & Penny, W. D. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009092 · Cited by 12
Goals as reward-producing programs
Davidson, G., Todd, G., Togelius, J., Gureckis, T. M., & Lake, B. M. (2025) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-025-00981-4 · Cited by 26
Evolution of attention in learning
Kruschke, J. K., & Hullinger, R. A. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511760402.002 · Cited by 11
Modeling Human Performance in Statistical Word Segmentation
Frank, M. C., Goldwater, S. J., Mansinghka, V. K., Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007) · Cited by 11
Griffiths, T. L., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Kemp, C. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0003 · Cited by 12
Song, M., Baah, P. A., Cai, M. B., & Niv, Y. (2022) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010699 · Cited by 12
Quantifiers satisfying semantic universals have shorter minimal description length
van de Pol, I., Lodder, P., van Maanen, L., Steinert‐Threlkeld, S., & Szymanik, J. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105150 · Cited by 11
Interpreting actions by attributing compositional desires.
Velez‐Ginorio, J., Siegel, M., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Jara‐Ettinger, J. (2017) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 11
Local Search and the Evolution of World Models
Bramley, N. R., Zhao, B., Quillien, T., & Lucas, C. G. (2023) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12703 · Cited by 15
Compositional diversity in visual concept learning
Zhou, Y., Feinman, R., & Lake, B. M. (2024) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105711 · Cited by 16
Constraints on learning disjunctive, unidimensional auditory and phonetic categories
Heffner, C. C., Idsardi, W. J., & Newman, R. S. (2019) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-019-01683-x · Cited by 10
Toward a Taxonomy and Computational Models of Abnormalities in Images
Farhadi, A., Elgammal, A., Feldman, J., & Saleh, B. (2016) · Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) · doi:10.7282/t3319xtq · Cited by 10
Compositionality in rational analysis: grammar-based induction for concept learning
Goodman, N. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., Griffiths, T. L., & Feldman, J. (2008) · Cited by 10
A cognitively plausible model for grammar induction
Katzir, R. (2015) · Journal of Language Modelling · doi:10.15398/jlm.v2i2.85 · Cited by 19
Saleh, B., Elgammal, A., & Feldman, J. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.02865 · Cited by 13
CURI: A Benchmark for Productive Concept Learning Under UncertaintyPreprint
Vedantam, R., Szlam, A. D., Nickel, M., Morcos, A. S., & Lake, B. M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.02855 · Cited by 10
The Limits of Learning: Exploration, Generalization, and the Development of Learning TrapsPreprint
Rich, A., & Gureckis, T. M. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ykts2 · Cited by 13
Show or Tell? Exploring when (and why) teaching with language outperforms demonstrationPreprint
Sumers, T. R., Ho, M. K., Hawkins, R. D., & Griffiths, T. L. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105326 · Cited by 20
Compositionality Under Time PressurePreprint
Rubino, V., Hamidi, M., Dayan, P., & Wu, C. M. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/z2648 · Cited by 10
Bonawitz, E. B., Ullman, T. D., Alison Gopnik, C., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2012) · IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL) · doi:10.1109/devlrn.2012.6400815 · Cited by 9
Critique of pure Bayesian cognitive science: A view from the philosophy of science
Crupi, V., & Calzavarini, F. (2023) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-023-00533-w · Cited by 10
Eyetracking reveals multiple-category use in induction.
Chen, S. Y., Ross, B. H., & Murphy, G. L. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000222 · Cited by 9
Freer, C. E., Roy, D. M., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107338579.007 · Cited by 11
Representing and Learning a Large System of Number Concepts with Latent Predicate Networks.
Rule, J., Dechter, E., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2015) · Cognitive Science · Cited by 9
Kapatsinski, V. M. (2009) · ProQuest Demo Repository · Cited by 9
Incremental hypothesis revision in causal reasoning across developmentPreprint
Gelpí, R., Prystawski, B., Lucas, C. G., & Buchsbaum, D. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/nyahu · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodman, N. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., Feldman, J., & Griffiths, T. L.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Goodman, Noah D.
- Venue
- Cognitive Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 108-154
- ISSN
- 0364-0213 (ISSN-L)
- 1551-6709
- OpenAlex
- W2142336306
- Cited by
- 469
- References
- 96
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 23.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cognitive Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0339062)
- James S. McDonnell Foundation
- Air Force Office of Scientific Research
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
- Keywords
- Bayesian inference, category learning, rational analysis, individual differences in learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review