Human inference in changing environments with temporal structure.
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
To make informed decisions in natural environments that change over time, humans must update their beliefs as new observations are gathered. Studies exploring human inference as a dynamical process that unfolds in time have focused on situations in which the statistics of observations are history-independent. Yet, temporal structure is everywhere in nature and yields history-dependent observations. Do humans modify their inference processes depending on the latent temporal statistics of their observations? We investigate this question experimentally and theoretically using a change-point inference task. We show that humans adapt their inference process to fine aspects of the temporal structure in the statistics of stimuli. As such, humans behave qualitatively in a Bayesian fashion but, quantitatively, deviate away from optimality. Perhaps more importantly, humans behave suboptimally in that their responses are not deterministic, but variable. We show that this variability itself is modulated by the temporal statistics of stimuli. To elucidate the cognitive algorithm that yields this behavior, we investigate a broad array of existing and new models that characterize different sources of suboptimal deviations away from Bayesian inference. While models with "output noise" that corrupts the response-selection process are natural candidates, human behavior is best described by sampling-based inference models, in which the main ingredient is a compressed approximation of the posterior, represented through a modest set of random samples and updated over time. This result comes to complement a growing literature on sample-based representation and learning in humans. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Discontinuous phase transitions in information-processing strategies have also been reported within the information bottleneck framework.
“Discontinuous phase transitions in informationprocessing strategies have also been reported within the information bottleneck framework [38-42].”
From Theoretical Analysis of Resource-Induced Phase Transitions in Estimation Strategies (2026) · cites this paper as [38]
The Summary (p. 23) reports that subjects adapt their learning rate to temporal structure, and the rational-inattention discussion (p. 26) describes an information-based model. Neither passage reports a discontinuous phase transition in information-processing strategies within the information bottleneck framework. Searches for “information bottleneck” and “discontinuous phase transition” found no passage addressing that claim. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Estimating the Dimension of a Model
Schwarz, G. (1978) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136 · Cited by 47,033 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A standard method to fit and compare models is to maximize the log-likelihood of each model and compute its Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), which includes a penalty as a function of the number of parameters in the model [56].”
MethodA Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure
(1979) · Scandinavian Journal of Statistics · doi:10.2307/4615733 · Cited by 21,526 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Bonferroni-Holm correction [44] is applied in panel B.”
MethodA tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking
Arulampalam, M. S., Maskell, S. R., Gordon, N., & Clapp, T. C. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/78.978374 · Cited by 11,531 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Monte Carlo algorithms perform such approximations by way of randomly sampling the spatial distribution; sequential Monte Carlo methods, or ‘particle filters’, were developed in the 1990s to address Hidden Markov Models, a class of hidden-state problems within which falls our inference task [50, 51, 52].”
MethodNovel approach to nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian state estimation
Gordon, N., Salmond, D., & Smith, A. F. M. (1993) · IEE Proceedings F Radar and Signal Processing · doi:10.1049/ip-f-2.1993.0015 · Cited by 8,855 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Monte Carlo algorithms perform such approximations by way of randomly sampling the spatial distribution; sequential Monte Carlo methods, or ‘particle filters’, were developed in the 1990s to address Hidden Markov Models, a class of hidden-state problems within which falls our inference task [50, 51, 52].”
MethodProbability theory: the logic of science
Jaynes, E., Grandy, T., Smith, R., et al. (2005) · doi:10.1007/bf02985800 · Cited by 5,556 · cited 1×
“The Bayesian paradigm has been viewed as an extension of logic that enables reasoning with propositions whose truth or falsity is uncertain [59, 60].”
BackgroundHumans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion
Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415429a · Cited by 4,844 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In cognitive science, it has successfully accounted for a wide range of observations, including cue combination in humans [5, 4, 1, 61, 3, 6, 7, 2], sensorimotor control [8, 9, 62], integration of temporal statistics [37, 36, 10, 11, 38], perceptual multistability [63, 41, 42], and various aspects of cognition [64, 65…”
BackgroundImplications of rational inattention
Sims, C. (2003) · Journal of Monetary Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-3932(03)00029-1 · Cited by 3,582 · cited 1× · see citing works
“5 Alternative models of response selection: ‘rational inattention’ and ad hoc repetition probability Aside from posterior sampling and motor noise, the so-called ‘rational inattention’ approach which has been gaining grounds in economics [79, 80, 81], suggests a different account of the variability of responses in dec…”
BackgroundTHOMPSON, W. R. (1933) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/25.3-4.285 · Cited by 2,712 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In explore-exploit problems, ‘Thompson sampling’ [83] refers to a strategy in which one ‘explores’ by randomly choosing an action with the probability that this action maximizes the reward (instead of deterministically choosing the action most likely to maximize the reward).”
BackgroundHerrnstein, R. J. (1961) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267 · Cited by 2,281 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Decision by posterior sampling, or ‘probability matching’, has been suggested by other decision-making experiments [74, 75, 76] and, more recently, perceptual experiments [77, 2, 41].”
BackgroundBayesian integration in sensorimotor learning
Körding, K. P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02169 · Cited by 2,004 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Unless otherwise stated, we focus our analyses on cases in which the surprise, xt+1 − ŝt, is in the [8,18] window, in which there is appreciable ambiguity in the signal.”
BackgroundResultProbability, Frequency and Reasonable Expectation
Cox, R. T. (1946) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1990764 · Cited by 1,290 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The Bayesian paradigm has been viewed as an extension of logic that enables reasoning with propositions whose truth or falsity is uncertain [59, 60].”
BackgroundCorrelates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal.
Ramus, F., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2000) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00101-3 · Cited by 1,264 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Our observations confirm and extend the results reported in the change-point literature on human inference in the context of Poisson statistics, by exploring a more ecological [27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35], non-Poisson, temporally structured environment.”
BackgroundResultSpatial control of arm movements
Morasso, P. (2004) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00236911 · Cited by 1,215 · see citing works
Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control
Kording, K. P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.003 · Cited by 866 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Average learning rates in HI (blue) and HD (orange) conditions, at short run-lengths (τ̃ ∈ [5, 6]) and long run-lengths (τ̃ ∈ [9, 10]).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialIs walking a random walk? Evidence for long-range correlations in stride interval of human gait
Hausdorff, J. M., Peng, C., Ladin, Z., Wei, J. Y., & Goldberger, A. L. (1995) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1995.78.1.349 · Cited by 843 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Our observations confirm and extend the results reported in the change-point literature on human inference in the context of Poisson statistics, by exploring a more ecological [27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35], non-Poisson, temporally structured environment.”
BackgroundResultTemporal context calibrates interval timing
Jazayeri, M., & Shadlen, M. N. (2010) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2590 · Cited by 773 · cited 6× · see citing works
“In a number of experiments [36, 37, 38, 10, 11], a first event (a sensory cue, or a motor action such as a lever press) is followed by a second event, such as the delivery of a reward, or a ‘go’ signal triggering the next behavior.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialIntegration of Proprioceptive and Visual Position-Information: An Experimentally Supported Model
van Beers, R. J., Sittig, A. C., & Gon, J. J. D. V. D. (1999) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1999.81.3.1355 · Cited by 742 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In cognitive science, it has successfully accounted for a wide range of observations, including cue combination in humans [5, 4, 1, 61, 3, 6, 7, 2], sensorimotor control [8, 9, 62], integration of temporal statistics [37, 36, 10, 11, 38], perceptual multistability [63, 41, 42], and various aspects of cognition [64, 65…”
BackgroundRational regulation of learning dynamics by pupil-linked arousal systems
Nassar, M. R., Rumsey, K. M., Wilson, R. C., Parikh, K., Heasly, B., & Gold, J. I. (2012) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3130 · Cited by 722 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Unless otherwise stated, we focus our analyses on cases in which the surprise, xt+1 − ŝt, is in the [8,18] window, in which there is appreciable ambiguity in the signal.”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationA sequential particle filter method for static models
Chopin, N. (2002) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/89.3.539 · Cited by 709 · see citing works
Computational rationality: A converging paradigm for intelligence in brains, minds, and machines
Gershman, S. J., Horvitz, E., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aac6076 · Cited by 677 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This suggests that humans use approximations when carrying out inference and estimation tasks [71, 72, 73].”
BackgroundStatistically optimal perception and learning: from behavior to neural representations
Fiser, J., Berkes, P., Orbán, G., & Lengyel, M. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.003 · Cited by 672 · cited 2× · see citing works
“At the implementation level, sample-based representations are well suited to learning in neural networks [97].”
BackgroundOptimal Predictions in Everyday Cognition
Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01780.x · Cited by 637 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In cognitive science, it has successfully accounted for a wide range of observations, including cue combination in humans [5, 4, 1, 61, 3, 6, 7, 2], sensorimotor control [8, 9, 62], integration of temporal statistics [37, 36, 10, 11, 38], perceptual multistability [63, 41, 42], and various aspects of cognition [64, 65…”
BackgroundThompson Sampling: An Asymptotically Optimal Finite-Time Analysis
Kaufmann, E., Korda, N., & Munos, R. (2012) · International Conference on Algorithmic Learning Theory · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34106-9_18 · Cited by 624 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Although close to optimal in some specific paradigms [78], sampling is suboptimal in the context of our behavioral task.”
BackgroundBayesian Online Changepoint Detection
Adams, R. P., & MacKay, D. J. C. (2007) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0710.3742 · Cited by 601 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A growing theoretical and experimental literature examines inference problems for this class of signals [12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26].”
BackgroundA representation of the hazard rate of elapsed time in macaque area LIP
Janssen, P., & Shadlen, M. N. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1386 · Cited by 601 · cited 5× · see citing works
“In a number of experiments [36, 37, 38, 10, 11], a first event (a sensory cue, or a motor action such as a lever press) is followed by a second event, such as the delivery of a reward, or a ‘go’ signal triggering the next behavior.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialNassar, M. R., Wilson, R. C., Heasly, B. S., & Gold, J. I. (2010) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0822-10.2010 · Cited by 564 · cited 5× · see citing works
“The literature on Bayesian online inference in cognition, where belief is updated iteratively as a function of incoming information, is growing; examples can be found in word segmentation [68], sentence processing [69], conditioning [70], as well as in the change-point literature [16, 17, 15, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26].”
InfluentialSelf-citationVul (2014) · doi:10.1111/cogs.12101 · Cited by 502 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The success of particle filters, also known as Sequential Monte Carlo method, in accounting for human behavior in an online inference task adds to a growing literature on sample-based representations in cognitive processes [40, 41, 42, 43].”
BackgroundA rational analysis of rule-based concept learning
Goodman, N. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., Feldman, J., & Griffiths, T. L. (2008) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1080/03640210701802071 · Cited by 469 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The success of particle filters, also known as Sequential Monte Carlo method, in accounting for human behavior in an online inference task adds to a growing literature on sample-based representations in cognitive processes [40, 41, 42, 43].”
BackgroundHuys, Q. J. M., Eshel, N., O'Nions, E., Sheridan, L., Dayan, P., & Roiser, J. P. (2012) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002410 · Cited by 439 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Both these inference strategies reduce the memory load in the inference problem by stochastically trimming the posterior, in a fashion akin to the ‘pruning’ model proposed by [82] in the context of a decision-tree task.”
MethodBayesian integration of visual and auditory signals for spatial localization
Battaglia, P., Jacobs, R. A., & Aslin, R. Ν. (2003) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.20.001391 · Cited by 426 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In cognitive science, it has successfully accounted for a wide range of observations, including cue combination in humans [5, 4, 1, 61, 3, 6, 7, 2], sensorimotor control [8, 9, 62], integration of temporal statistics [37, 36, 10, 11, 38], perceptual multistability [63, 41, 42], and various aspects of cognition [64, 65…”
BackgroundSlant from texture and disparity cues: Optimal cue combination
Hillis, J. M., Watt, S. J., Landy, M. S., & Banks, M. S. (2004) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/4.12.1 · Cited by 421 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Average learning rates in HI (blue) and HD (orange) conditions, at short run-lengths (τ̃ ∈ [5, 6]) and long run-lengths (τ̃ ∈ [9, 10]).”
BackgroundInfluentialBuesing, L., Bill, J., Nessler, B., & Maass, W. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002211 · Cited by 384 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Here, the variability in neural activity can be interpreted in terms of sampling-based representations of probability [98, 97, 99, 42], and a number of neural network models performing probability sampling have been proposed [100, 41, 101, 102, 103].”
BackgroundOn‐line inference for multiple changepoint problems
Fearnhead, P., & Liu, Z. (2007) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00601.x · Cited by 372 · cited 2× · see citing works
“All these studies, with the exception of the work of [13], focus on the history-independent case of random change points that obey Poisson temporal statistics.”
BackgroundRational approximations to rational models: alternative algorithms for category learning
Sanborn, A. N., Griffiths, T. L., & Navarro, D. J. (2010) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0020511 · Cited by 369 · cited 3× · see citing works
“In a similar spirit, particle filters have been shown to account for order effects in category learning [92] and observations about online sentence comprehension (such as the processing of ‘garden-path sentences’ [69]).”
BackgroundMethodInformation-constrained state-dependent pricing
Woodford, M. (2009) · Journal of Monetary Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jmoneco.2009.06.014 · Cited by 337 · cited 1× · see citing works
“5 Alternative models of response selection: ‘rational inattention’ and ad hoc repetition probability Aside from posterior sampling and motor noise, the so-called ‘rational inattention’ approach which has been gaining grounds in economics [79, 80, 81], suggests a different account of the variability of responses in dec…”
BackgroundOptimal integration of texture and motion cues to depth
Jacobs, R. A. (1999) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00088-7 · Cited by 324 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Average learning rates in HI (blue) and HD (orange) conditions, at short run-lengths (τ̃ ∈ [5, 6]) and long run-lengths (τ̃ ∈ [9, 10]).”
BackgroundInfluentialBayesian Brains without Probabilities
Sanborn, A. N., & Chater, N. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.003 · Cited by 307 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Moreover, they account for a range of cognitive biases in the laboratory, such as base-rate neglect, conjunction fallacy, and the unpacking effect, as well as for human performance in complex, real-world tasks, and specific observations such as response variability and autocorrelation in perception and reasoning tasks…”
BackgroundAttentional modulation in visual cortex depends on task timing
Ghose, G. M., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01057 · Cited by 297 · cited 5× · see citing works
“In a number of experiments [36, 37, 38, 10, 11], a first event (a sensory cue, or a motor action such as a lever press) is followed by a second event, such as the delivery of a reward, or a ‘go’ signal triggering the next behavior.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialBlaisdell, A. P., Sawa, K., Leising, K. J., & Waldmann, M. R. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1121872 · Cited by 294 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In cognitive science, it has successfully accounted for a wide range of observations, including cue combination in humans [5, 4, 1, 61, 3, 6, 7, 2], sensorimotor control [8, 9, 62], integration of temporal statistics [37, 36, 10, 11, 38], perceptual multistability [63, 41, 42], and various aspects of cognition [64, 65…”
BackgroundDeconstructing the human algorithms for exploration
Gershman, S. J. (2018) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.014 · Cited by 267 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Several studies have reported that the responses of human subjects in explore-exploit tasks appeared consistent with Thompson sampling [84, 85, 86].”
ResultProbability matching as a computational strategy used in perception
Wozny, D. R., Beierholm, U. R., & Shams, L. (2010) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000871 · Cited by 265 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Decision by posterior sampling, or ‘probability matching’, has been suggested by other decision-making experiments [74, 75, 76] and, more recently, perceptual experiments [77, 2, 41].”
BackgroundKnill, D. C. (2007) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/7.7.5 · Cited by 191 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In cognitive science, it has successfully accounted for a wide range of observations, including cue combination in humans [5, 4, 1, 61, 3, 6, 7, 2], sensorimotor control [8, 9, 62], integration of temporal statistics [37, 36, 10, 11, 38], perceptual multistability [63, 41, 42], and various aspects of cognition [64, 65…”
BackgroundNormative evidence accumulation in unpredictable environments
Glaze, C. M., Kable, J. W., & Gold, J. I. (2015) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.08825 · Cited by 190 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The literature on Bayesian online inference in cognition, where belief is updated iteratively as a function of incoming information, is growing; examples can be found in word segmentation [68], sentence processing [69], conditioning [70], as well as in the change-point literature [16, 17, 15, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26].”
BackgroundBayesian sampling in visual perception
Moreno-Bote, R., Knill, D. C., & Pouget, A. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1101430108 · Cited by 182 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Here, the variability in neural activity can be interpreted in terms of sampling-based representations of probability [98, 97, 99, 42], and a number of neural network models performing probability sampling have been proposed [100, 41, 101, 102, 103].”
BackgroundInfluentialComputational Precision of Mental Inference as Critical Source of Human Choice Suboptimality
Drugowitsch, J., Wyart, V., Devauchelle, A.-D., & Koechlin, É. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.11.005 · Cited by 179 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Aside from stochasticity in the inference step and in the response-selection step, noise in the sensory observation is a possible alternate account of behavioral variability, discussed, among others, by [90] and [58].”
BackgroundResultUncertainty and Exploration in a Restless Bandit Problem
Speekenbrink, M., & Konstantinidis, E. (2015) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12145 · Cited by 177 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Several studies have reported that the responses of human subjects in explore-exploit tasks appeared consistent with Thompson sampling [84, 85, 86].”
ResultA large-scale multilingual study of silent pause duration
Campione, E., & Véronis, J. (2002) · Speech prosody · doi:10.21437/speechprosody.2002-35 · Cited by 171 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Our observations confirm and extend the results reported in the change-point literature on human inference in the context of Poisson statistics, by exploring a more ecological [27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35], non-Poisson, temporally structured environment.”
BackgroundResultUniversal Scaling Law in Human Behavioral Organization
Nakamura, T., Kiyono, K., Yoshiuchi, K., Nakahara, R., Struzik, Z. R., & Yamamoto, Y. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.138103 · Cited by 157 · cited 2× · see citing works
“[27], [28, 29], and [30] have recorded the motor activity of both rodents and human subjects over the course of several days.”
BackgroundResultBayesian Online Learning of the Hazard Rate in Change-Point Problems
Wilson, R. C., Nassar, M. R., & Gold, J. I. (2010) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_00007 · Cited by 152 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The literature on Bayesian online inference in cognition, where belief is updated iteratively as a function of incoming information, is growing; examples can be found in word segmentation [68], sentence processing [69], conditioning [70], as well as in the change-point literature [16, 17, 15, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26].”
BackgroundSelf-citationMultistability and perceptual inference
Gershman, S. J., Vul, E., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2012) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_00226 · Cited by 140 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Here, the variability in neural activity can be interpreted in terms of sampling-based representations of probability [98, 97, 99, 42], and a number of neural network models performing probability sampling have been proposed [100, 41, 101, 102, 103].”
BackgroundInfluentialFormalizing Neurath’s ship: approximate algorithms for online causal learning.
Bramley, N. R., Dayan, P., Griffiths, T. L., & Lagnado, D. A. (2017) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000061 · Cited by 136 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In addition, [95] consider only the case of a single particle.”
BackgroundOn the Origins of Suboptimality in Human Probabilistic Inference
Acerbi, L., Vijayakumar, S., & Wolpert, D. M. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003661 · Cited by 133 · cited 1× · see citing works
“[53] argue that, for some forms of random perturbations of a posterior probability density, maximizing the randomly perturbed function yields similar results to sampling from a modified posterior density function obtained as a power of the correct posterior: pκ(s) ∝ p(s|x1:t).”
ResultDetecting and predicting changes
Brown, S. D., & Steyvers, M. (2008) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.09.002 · Cited by 125 · cited 3× · see citing works
“) Previous uses of particle-filter methods in the context of a variety of cognitive tasks yielded best-fitting numbers of particles which ranged from one to several hundreds: from one to 400 particles, with a mean of 56, in [14]; 130 particles (but 70 when subjects simultaneously perform a distractor task) in [94]; ar…”
BackgroundMethodTesting Bayesian Models of Human Coincidence Timing
Miyazaki, M., Nozaki, D., & Nakajima, Y. (2005) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.01168.2004 · Cited by 125 · cited 9× · see citing works
“Average learning rates in HI (blue) and HD (orange) conditions, at short run-lengths (τ̃ ∈ [5, 6]) and long run-lengths (τ̃ ∈ [9, 10]).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialA Model of Reward- and Effort-Based Optimal Decision Making and Motor Control
Rigoux, L., & Guigon, E. (2012) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002716 · Cited by 124 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Another possible explanation is that even though the new estimate falls on a nearby location, a motor cost prohibits a move if it is not sufficiently extended to be ‘worth it’ [45, 46, 47, 48].”
BackgroundComputational approaches to motor control
Flash, T., & B, T. J. S. A. (2001) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(01)00265-3 · Cited by 113 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Another possible explanation is that even though the new estimate falls on a nearby location, a motor cost prohibits a move if it is not sufficiently extended to be ‘worth it’ [45, 46, 47, 48].”
BackgroundPerceptual multistability predicted by search model for bayesian decisions.
Sundareswara, R., & Schrater, P. R. (2008) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/8.5.12 · Cited by 112 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In cognitive science, it has successfully accounted for a wide range of observations, including cue combination in humans [5, 4, 1, 61, 3, 6, 7, 2], sensorimotor control [8, 9, 62], integration of temporal statistics [37, 36, 10, 11, 38], perceptual multistability [63, 41, 42], and various aspects of cognition [64, 65…”
BackgroundMixture models and the probabilistic structure of depth cues.
Knill, D. (2003) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(03)00003-8 · Cited by 108 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In cognitive science, it has successfully accounted for a wide range of observations, including cue combination in humans [5, 4, 1, 61, 3, 6, 7, 2], sensorimotor control [8, 9, 62], integration of temporal statistics [37, 36, 10, 11, 38], perceptual multistability [63, 41, 42], and various aspects of cognition [64, 65…”
BackgroundA Mixture of Delta-Rules Approximation to Bayesian Inference in Change-Point Problems
Wilson, R. C., Nassar, M. R., & Gold, J. I. (2013) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003150 · Cited by 103 · cited 5× · see citing works
“The literature on Bayesian online inference in cognition, where belief is updated iteratively as a function of incoming information, is growing; examples can be found in word segmentation [68], sentence processing [69], conditioning [70], as well as in the change-point literature [16, 17, 15, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationOf Mice and Men — Universality and Breakdown of Behavioral Organization
Nakamura, T., Takumi, T., Takano, A., Aoyagi, N., Yoshiuchi, K., Struzik, Z. R., & Yamamoto, Y. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002050 · Cited by 101 · cited 2× · see citing works
“[27], [28, 29], and [30] have recorded the motor activity of both rodents and human subjects over the course of several days.”
BackgroundResultProbability matching in choice under uncertainty: intuition versus deliberation.
Koehler, D. J., & James, G. (2009) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.07.003 · Cited by 94 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Decision by posterior sampling, or ‘probability matching’, has been suggested by other decision-making experiments [74, 75, 76] and, more recently, perceptual experiments [77, 2, 41].”
BackgroundRhythmicity and cross-modal temporal cues facilitate detection
ten Oever, S., Schroeder, C., Poeppel, D., et al. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.008 · Cited by 86 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Likewise, our results come to complement those of a number of studies on perception and decision-making that also investigate inference from stimuli with temporal statistics [36, 37, 38, 10, 11, 39].”
BackgroundResultGlaze, C. M., Filipowicz, A. L. S., Kable, J. W., Balasubramanian, V., & Gold, J. I. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0297-4 · Cited by 80 · cited 4× · see citing works
“) Previous uses of particle-filter methods in the context of a variety of cognitive tasks yielded best-fitting numbers of particles which ranged from one to several hundreds: from one to 400 particles, with a mean of 56, in [14]; 130 particles (but 70 when subjects simultaneously perform a distractor task) in [94]; ar…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRats adopt the optimal timescale for evidence integration in a dynamic environment
Piet, A. T., El Hady, A., & Brody, C. D. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06561-y · Cited by 76 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The literature on Bayesian online inference in cognition, where belief is updated iteratively as a function of incoming information, is growing; examples can be found in word segmentation [68], sentence processing [69], conditioning [70], as well as in the change-point literature [16, 17, 15, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26].”
BackgroundDiscrete Adjustment to a Changing Environment: Experimental Evidence
Khaw, M. W., Stevens, L., & Woodford, M. (2017) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.1016/j.jmoneco.2017.09.001 · Cited by 70 · cited 7× · see citing works
“The literature on Bayesian online inference in cognition, where belief is updated iteratively as a function of incoming information, is growing; examples can be found in word segmentation [68], sentence processing [69], conditioning [70], as well as in the change-point literature [16, 17, 15, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAitchison, L., & Lengyel, M. (2016) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005186 · Cited by 67 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Here, the variability in neural activity can be interpreted in terms of sampling-based representations of probability [98, 97, 99, 42], and a number of neural network models performing probability sampling have been proposed [100, 41, 101, 102, 103].”
BackgroundKrishan, M., Ye, L., & Gallistel, C. (n.d.) · doi:10.1037/e520562012-044 · Cited by 67 · cited 3×
“The literature on Bayesian online inference in cognition, where belief is updated iteratively as a function of incoming information, is growing; examples can be found in word segmentation [68], sentence processing [69], conditioning [70], as well as in the change-point literature [16, 17, 15, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26].”
BackgroundBayesian approaches to sensory integration for motor control
Berniker, M., & Kording, K. P. (2011) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.125 · Cited by 66 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In cognitive science, it has successfully accounted for a wide range of observations, including cue combination in humans [5, 4, 1, 61, 3, 6, 7, 2], sensorimotor control [8, 9, 62], integration of temporal statistics [37, 36, 10, 11, 38], perceptual multistability [63, 41, 42], and various aspects of cognition [64, 65…”
BackgroundHow Haptic Size Sensations Improve Distance Perception
Battaglia, P., Kersten, D., & Schrater, P. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002080 · Cited by 54 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Another interpretation of this sampling strategy is proposed by [2]: in the case of an integer κ and a Gaussian posterior, the mean of κ samples drawn from the posterior is a Gaussian random variable, with a standard deviation equal to that of the posterior scaled by 1/ √ κ; i.”
BackgroundInfluentialOnline Learning Mechanisms for Bayesian Models of Word Segmentation
Pearl, L., Goldwater, S. J., & Steyvers, M. (2010) · Research on Language and Computation · doi:10.1007/s11168-011-9074-5 · Cited by 52 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The literature on Bayesian online inference in cognition, where belief is updated iteratively as a function of incoming information, is growing; examples can be found in word segmentation [68], sentence processing [69], conditioning [70], as well as in the change-point literature [16, 17, 15, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26].”
BackgroundUnraveling the fluctuations of animal motor activity.
Anteneodo, C., & Chialvo, D. (2009) · Chaos · doi:10.1063/1.3211189 · Cited by 47 · cited 2× · see citing works
“[27], [28, 29], and [30] have recorded the motor activity of both rodents and human subjects over the course of several days.”
BackgroundResultTypes of approximation for probabilistic cognition: Sampling and variational.
Sanborn, A. N. (2017) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2015.06.008 · Cited by 45 · cited 1× · see citing works
“tion, etc); they have also been put forth as candidate cognitive algorithms [96, 72].”
BackgroundNoisy Memory and Over-Reaction to News
da Silveira, R. D., & Woodford, M. (2019) · AEA Papers and Proceedings · doi:10.1257/pandp.20191049 · Cited by 43 · cited 1×
“A similar picture has been advanced in the context of prediction tasks, where ‘over-reaction’ – effectively a biased, enhanced learning rate – results from the compression of information stored in memory [87, 88, 89].”
BackgroundSelf-citationRandom Stride Intervals with Memory
Griffin, L., West, D., & West, B. (2000) · Journal of biological physics (Print) · doi:10.1023/a:1010322406831 · Cited by 39 · cited 2×
“Our observations confirm and extend the results reported in the change-point literature on human inference in the context of Poisson statistics, by exploring a more ecological [27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35], non-Poisson, temporally structured environment.”
BackgroundResultMice infer probabilistic models for timing
Li, Y., & Dudman, J. T. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1310666110 · Cited by 36 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Likewise, our results come to complement those of a number of studies on perception and decision-making that also investigate inference from stimuli with temporal statistics [36, 37, 38, 10, 11, 39].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialEvidence Accumulation and Change Rate Inference in Dynamic Environments
Radillo, A. E., Veliz‐Cuba, A., Josić́, K., & Kilpatrick, Z. P. (2017) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_00957 · Cited by 27 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A growing theoretical and experimental literature examines inference problems for this class of signals [12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26].”
BackgroundOnline learning of symbolic concepts
Thaker, P., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Gershman, S. J. (2017) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2017.01.002 · Cited by 24 · cited 1× · see citing works
“) Previous uses of particle-filter methods in the context of a variety of cognitive tasks yielded best-fitting numbers of particles which ranged from one to several hundreds: from one to 400 particles, with a mean of 56, in [14]; 130 particles (but 70 when subjects simultaneously perform a distractor task) in [94]; ar…”
MethodLloyd, K., Sanborn, A. N., Leslie, D. S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12805 · Cited by 24 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Here, we mention that, even though models with temporal correlation such as the particle filter have been used to capture cognitive processes, to the best of our knowledge Bayesian model selection using the BIC has not been applied to them, except in the case of a binary categorization task [57].”
MethodMaximizing masquerading as matching in human visual search choice behavior.
Yu, A. J., & Huang, H. (2014) · Decision · doi:10.1037/dec0000013 · Cited by 18 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Sampling from the modified posterior yields a behavior that interpolates between posterior sampling (for κ = 1) and maximizing (for κ→∞); it yields a family of softmax operations over the posterior [54, 55].”
BackgroundAmaral, L. A. N., Soares, D. J. B., da Silva, L. R., LUCENA, L. S., Saito, M., Kumano, H., Aoyagi, N., & Yamamoto, Y. (2004) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/epl/i2003-10227-7 · Cited by 14 · cited 2× · see citing works
“[27], [28, 29], and [30] have recorded the motor activity of both rodents and human subjects over the course of several days.”
BackgroundResultNeligh, N. (2024) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4273575 · Cited by 13 · cited 1×
“A similar picture has been advanced in the context of prediction tasks, where ‘over-reaction’ – effectively a biased, enhanced learning rate – results from the compression of information stored in memory [87, 88, 89].”
BackgroundRational Variability in Children’s Causal Inferences: The Sampling HypothesisPreprint
Denison, S., Bonawitz, E. B., Alison Gopnik, C., & Griffiths, T. L. (2018) · Cognition · doi:10.31219/osf.io/9y6t2 · Cited by 6 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Decision by posterior sampling, or ‘probability matching’, has been suggested by other decision-making experiments [74, 75, 76] and, more recently, perceptual experiments [77, 2, 41].”
BackgroundPerformance of normative and approximate evidence accumulation on the dynamic clicks taskPreprint
Radillo, A. E., Veliz-Cuba, A., Josić, K., & Kilpatrick, Z. (2019) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/541045 · Cited by 5 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A growing theoretical and experimental literature examines inference problems for this class of signals [12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26].”
BackgroundStochastic models of evidence accumulation in changing environmentsPreprint
Veliz‐Cuba, A., Kilpatrick, Z. P., & Josić́, K. (2015) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/019398 · Cited by 2 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A growing theoretical and experimental literature examines inference problems for this class of signals [12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26].”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
20 of the 104 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- [27][27] L. A. Nunes Amaral, D. J. Bezerra Soares, L. R. da Silva, L. S. Lucena, M. Saito, H. Kumano, N. Aoyagi, and Y. Yamamoto. Power law temporal auto-correlations in day-long records of human physical activity. Europhys. Lett. , 66(3):448-454, 2004. -
- [47][47] Reza Shadmehr. Computational Approaches to Motor Control. In Encyclopedia of Neuroscience , volume 3, pages 9-17. 2009. -
- [49][49] Sangtae Ahn and J.a. Fessler. Standard Errors of Mean, Variance, and Standard Deviation Estimators. EECS Department, University of Michigan , pages 1-2, 2003. -
- [52][52] Arnaud Doucet and Adam M Johansen. A Tutorial on Particle Filtering and Smoothing: Fifteen years later. In D. Crisan and B. Rozovsky, editors, The Oxford Handbook of Nonlinear Filtering , pages 1-39. Oxford University Press, 2008. -
- [54][54] Edward Vul. Sampling in human cognition - Chapter 1. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering , 72(4-B):2471, 2011. -
- [66][66] Alan A. Stocker and Eero P. Simoncelli. A Bayesian Model of Conditioned Perception. Advances in neural information processing systems , 20(May):1409-1416, 2008. -
- [67][67] Thomas L. Griffiths and Joshua B. Tenenbaum. Predicting the future as Bayesian inference: People combine prior knowledge with observations when estimating duration and extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 140(4):725-743, 2011. -
- [69][69] Roger Levy, Florencia Reali, and Thomas L. Griffiths. Modeling the effects of memory on human online sentence processing with particle filters. Proceedings of NIPS 2008 , pages 1-8, 2008. -
- [70][70] Nathaniel D Daw and Aaron C Courville. The pigeon as particle filter. Advances in neural information processing systems , pages 369-376, 2008. -
- [72][72] Samuel J. Gershman and Jeffrey M. Beck. Complex Probabilistic Inference : From Cognition to Neural Computation. In Computational Models of Brain and Behavior , pages 1-17. 2016. -
- [74][74] R J Herrnstein. Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior , 4(3):267-272, jul 1961. -
- [81][81] Christopher A. Sims. Rational Inattention and Monetary Economics - Handbook of Monetary Economics. Handbook of Monetary Economics , 3(2007):155-181, 2011. -
- [84][84] Eric Schulz, Emmanouil Konstantinidis, and Maarten Speekenbrink. Learning and decisions in contextual multi-armed bandit tasks. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society , 1:2122-2127, 2015. -
- [90][90] Alan A. Stocker and Eero P. Simoncelli. Sensory adaptation within a Bayesian framework for perception. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 18:1291-1298, 2006. -
- [91][91] Adam N. Sanborn, Thomas L. Griffiths, and Daniel J. Navarro. A More Rational Model of Categorization. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , pages 1-6, 2006. -
- [93][93] Edward Vul, Michael C Frank, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, and George Alvarez. Explaining human multiple object tracking as resource-constrained approximate inference in a dynamic probabilistic model. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 22:1-9, 2009. -
- [98][98] Patrik O Hoyer and Aapo Hyvärinen. Interpreting neural response variability as monte carlo sampling of the posterior. Advances in neural information processing systems , (1):293-300, 2003. -
- [100][100] L Shi and Thomas L. Griffiths. Neural implementation of hierarchical Bayesian inference by importance sampling. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 22 , pages 16691677, 2009. -
- [101][101] Guillaume Hennequin, Laurence Aitchison, and Máté Lengyel. Fast Sampling-Based Inference in Balanced Neuronal Networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 1-9, 2014. -
- [102][102] Cristina Savin and Sophie Denève. Spatio-temporal representations of uncertainty in spiking neural networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 1-9, 2014. -
- [104][104] Jonathan W Peirce. Generating stimuli for neuroscience using psychopy. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics , 2(10), 2009. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A taxonomy of surprise definitions
Modirshanechi, A., Brea, J., & Gerstner, W. (2022) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2022.102712 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Noise in Cognition: Bug or Feature?
Sanborn, A. N., Zhu, J.-Q., Spicer, J., León-Villagrá, P., Castillo, L., Falbén, J. K., Li, Y.-X., Tee, A., & Chater, N. (2025) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916241258951 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“Random errors in a calculation that are subsequently incorporated into later calculations are hallmarks of multistage sampling processes, such as ancestral sampling or sequential Monte Carlo (Daw & Courville, 2008; Prat-Carrabin et al., 2021; Sanborn et al., 2010).”
Foucault, C., & Meyniel, F. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.71801 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Resource-rational account of sequential effects in human prediction
Prat-Carrabin, A., Meyniel, F., & da Silveira, R. A. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.81256 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationBiases and Variability from Costly Bayesian Inference
Prat-Carrabin, A., Meyniel, F., Tsodyks, M. V., & da Silveira, R. A. (2021) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23050603 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Some experimental tasks are indeed set in such a context, as when human subjects are asked to make inferences in volatile environments [16, 19, 21, 28, 29] (see also models of temporal discounting [30–34]).”
Self-citationThe neural basis for uncertainty processing in hierarchical decision making
Wang, M. B., Lynch, N., & Halassa, M. M. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-63994-y · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Two Determinants of Dynamic Adaptive Learning for Magnitudes and Probabilities
Foucault, C., & Meyniel, F. (2024) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi_a_00139 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
An Introduction to Psychologically Plausible Sampling Schemes for Approximating Bayesian Inference
Zhu, J.-Q., Nick Chater, A., León-Villagrá, P., Spicer, J., Sundh, J., & Sanborn, A. N. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009002042.026 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Theoretical Analysis of Resource-Induced Phase Transitions in Estimation Strategies
Tottori, T., & Kobayashi, T. J. (2026) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/5ynb-7k4v
Fiedler, K., Juslin, P., & Denrell, J. C. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009002042.025
Stepwise updating of probabilities is neither universal nor fully explained by motor costs
Schirmeister, J., & Anderson, B. (2024) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-024-02584-3
Pupil Dynamics Reflect Uncertainty-Driven Adjustments of Probability LearningPreprint
Greenhouse‐Tucknott, A., Foucault, C., Buot, A., & Meyniel, F. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.02.26.708148 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Current understanding of how latent uncertainty factors drive trial-by-trial changes in apparent learning rates have been largely informed by the utilisation of predictive inference tasks that employ magnitude-based quantities, such as spatial positions [17,19,20] or numerical values [18].”
- Authors
- Prat-Carrabin, A., Wilson, R. C., Cohen, J. D., & Azeredo da Silveira, R.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 2021-10
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 879-912
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W3125960872
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 104
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Centre national de la recherche scientifique
- Princeton University
- Weizmann Institute of Science
- Fondation Pierre-Gilles de Gennes pour la Recherche
- Region Ile de France
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-EQPX-29-01)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
- Keywords
- human inference, temporal structure, change point detection, Bayesian inference, response variability, sampling-based inference, posterior approximation, belief updating, output noise, cognitive models
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Algorithms, Bayes Theorem, Humans, Learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review