Cited by 19Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsLanguage Development and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Limits on Composition of Conceptual Operations in 9‐Month‐Olds

Open access

Abstract

Complex systems are often built from a relatively small set of basic features or operations that can be combined in myriad ways. We investigated the developmental origins of this compositional architecture in 9‐month‐old infants, extending recent work that demonstrated rudimentary compositional abilities in preschoolers. Infants viewed two separate object‐occlusion events that depicted a single‐feature‐change operation. They were then tested with a combined operation to determine whether they expected the outcome of the two feature changes, even though this combination was unfamiliar. In contrast to preschoolers, infants did not appear to predictively compose these simple feature‐change operations. A second experiment demonstrated the ability of infants to track two operations when not combined. The failure to compose basic operations is consistent with limitations on object tracking and early numerical cognition (Feigenson & Yamaguchi, Infancy, 2009, 14, 244). We suggest that these results can be unified via a general principle: Infants have difficulty with multiple updates to a representation of an unobservable.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/infa.12225

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children are not born with an adult-like ability to compose functions; there seem to be important changes between infancy and pre-school that could be tied to learning.

    “First, children are not born with an adult-like ability to compose functions; in fact, there seem to be important changes between infancy58 and pre-school59 that could be tied to learning.”

    From Human-like systematic generalization through a meta-learning neural network (2023) · cites this paper as [58]

    The Introduction and Conclusion report that 9-month-olds did not predictively compose simple feature-change functions, in contrast to preschoolers. The General discussion says the developmental change remains unexplained and suggests developing abilities as possible contributors. The paper does not test newborns or establish that learning causes the change. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.1177/0963721412436806 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Boole G., 1854, An investigation of the laws of thought: On which are founded the mathematical theories of logic and probabilities
  3. Chalmers D. J., 1993, Connectionism and compositionality: Why fodor and pylyshyn were wrong
  4. Chomsky N., 1995, The minimalist program
  5. 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.09.010 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.09.010 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/1467-9280.00427 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/15250000802707096 · DOI
  9. Fodor J., 1975, The language of thought
  10. 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90014-B · DOI
  11. 10.1016/0010-0277(88)90031-5 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gelman A., 2007, Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models
  13. Goodman N., 2009, Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the cognitive science society, 2188
  14. 10.1214/aoms/1177729885 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00515.x · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.09.009 · DOI
  17. Katz Y., 2008, Proceedings of thirtieth annual meeting of the cognitive science society
  18. Kemp C., 2008, Learning and using relational theories, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 20, 753
  19. 10.1177/0956797611420165 · DOI
  20. 10.1371/journal.pone.0036399 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01113-3 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/1467-8624.00095 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.cogdev.2013.04.002 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.03.007 · DOI
  25. 10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.836 · DOI
  26. 10.1037/11168-000 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Piantadosi S. T.(2011).Learning and the language of thought. Unpublished doctoral dissertation MIT. Available fromhttp://colala.bcs.rochester.edu/papers/piantadosithesis.pdf
  28. 10.1371/journal.pone.0147734 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1177/0963721415609581 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.005 · DOI
  31. 10.1046/j.1467-8624.2003.00639.x · DOI
  32. 10.1016/0885-2014(95)90011-X · DOI
  33. 10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00728-7 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.2041-6962.1988.tb00470.x · DOI
  35. Smolensky P., 1998, Connectionism, constituency, and the language of thought, Cognitive Architectures in Artificial Intelligence: The Evolution of Research Programs, 2, 183
  36. 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00569.x · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1016/S0885-2014(99)80016-1 · DOI
  38. Ullman T., 2010, Proceedings of thirty‐second annual meeting of the cognitive science society
  39. Van Gelder T., 1990, Compositionality: A connectionist variation on a classical theme, Cognitive Science, 14, 355, 10.1016/0364-0213(90)90017-Q · DOI
  40. 10.2307/1166103 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/358749a0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Piantadosi, S. T., Palmeri, H., & Aslin, R.
Affiliations
University of Rochester (US)
Corresponding author
Piantadosi, Steven T.
Venue
Infancy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-01-31
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
310-324
ISSN
  • 1525-0008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7078
OpenAlex
W2906632862
Cited by
19
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Infancy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (F32HD070544)
  • National Institutes of Health (HD‐037082)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
compositional reasoning, infant cognitive development, object tracking, numerical cognition, object occlusion, feature change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review