Cited by 69Misinformation and Its ImpactsSocial Media and PoliticsCommunication and COVID-19 Impact

Digital disinformation and emotions: exploring the social risks of affective polarization

Serrano-Puche, Javier·2021·International Review of Sociology

Abstract

Considerable interest has recently emerged among communication scholars around what has been called the ‘information disorder’, that is, a constellation of media genres that includes disinformation, misinformation, fake news, propaganda and hyperpartisan news. The rise in this type of information pollution is related to a crisis of public communication where the public sphere in many countries has become divided and challenged by social and political tensions. On the other hand, the digital space emerges as a socio-technological environment configured around platforms that condition emotional expression through their affordances, favoring the appearance of affective publics. Taking the above into account, this paper offers a conceptual framework for understanding the role played by emotions in our present ‘information disorder’ and the societal risks that arise from it. It examines how fake news strategically relies on emotionally provocative content to induce outrage and other strong feelings among users, which are then viralized on platforms. The paper concludes by presenting some lines of action for minimizing those risks from the point of view of media literacy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03906701.2021.1947953

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study excludes from its analysis the use of social networks and other social media, which since at least 2011 are a growing space for political information flow, participation and activism, no less loaded with emotionality and dramatism.

    “este artículo excluye de su análisis el uso de redes sociales y otros medios de comunicación social, que, desde al menos 2011, son un espacio creciente para el flujo de información política, participación y activismo, no menos cargado de emocionalidad y dramatismo (Serrano-Puche, 2021).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Serrano-Puche, J.
Affiliations
Universidad de Navarra (ES)
Corresponding author
Serrano-Puche, Javier
Venue
International Review of Sociology
Published
2021-05-04
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
231-245
ISSN
  • 0390-6701 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9273
OpenAlex
W3186442548
Cited by
69
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1
FWCI
14.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Review of Sociology (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Navarra
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
Keywords
online disinformation, emotions, affective polarization, information disorder, fake news, outrage, viralization, social networking sites, media affordances, affective publics, media literacy, societal risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review