Cited by 59Evaluation of Teaching PracticesHigher Education Research StudiesEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

Student Perceptions of Factors Influencing Tertiary Learning

Watkins, David·1984·Higher Education Research & Development

Abstract

An interview study about perception of factors involved in tertiary learning of 60 second year students at the Australian National University is reported. Factors which encourage deep rather than surface level processing are highlighted as are problems of transition from school to tertiary learning. An unexpected outcome was that students’ responses to probing about the nature of the differences between school and tertiary learning provided evidence of qualitative differences between the way students utilising deep or surface level processing conceive the process of learning itself. This finding has implications both for those attempting to change these students’ approach to learning and for the selection of research methods appropriate for this area.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0729436840030103

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Suggested explanations for learning benefits of granting control include deeper processing of relevant information, error estimation, self-regulation strategies, and increased motivation.

    “For example, it has been suggested that a more active involvement of the learner in the learning process promotes deeper processing of relevant information (McCombs, 1989;Watkins, 1984;Chen & Singer, 1992); encourages error estimation (Chiviacowsky & Wulf, 2005); fosters the use of self-regulation strategies (Kirschenbaum, 1984); or that giving the learner control over the practice conditions”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Watkins, D.
Affiliations
Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Watkins, David
Venue
Higher Education Research & Development
Published
1984-01
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
33-50
ISSN
  • 0729-4360 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8366
OpenAlex
W1974070054
Cited by
59
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
11.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Higher Education Research & Development (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Chicago
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
deep and surface learning, student perceptions, transition from school to university, learning methods, conceptions of learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review