Cited by 47HIV Research and TreatmentHIV-related health complications and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Cognitive and Everyday Functioning in Older and Younger Adults With and Without HIV

Open access
Vance, David E., Wadley, Virginia G., Crowe, Michael G., Raper, James L., Ball, Karlene K.·2011·Clinical Gerontologist

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to: (1) examine cognitive performance differences in older and younger adults with and without HIV, and (2) determine if such differences were related to a laboratory measure of instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs). Ninety-eight HIV-positive (69 younger, 29 older) and 103 HIV-negative (84 younger, 19 older) adults were evaluated on a number of cognitive measures. Controlling for a number of confounders, age by HIV status interactions were found on two cognitive measures, indicating poorer cognitive performance for those aging with HIV. Poorer performance on these cognitive measures corresponded with poorer performance on the Timed Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (TIADL) test. These findings suggest that as adults age with HIV, they may be at risk for cognitive declines that would impair their ability to engage in activities important for maintaining independent living.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07317115.2011.588545

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hardy DJ Satz P Stefaniak M van Gorp WG Hinkin CH Stenquist PK Cognition in older adults with AIDS 1999 Poster presented at the 4th Annual UCLA Research Conference on Aging
  2. Vance DE Marceaux JC Fazeli P McKie-Bell P Ball KK Speed of processing training in older and younger adults with HIV: A pilot study 10 2009 Alabama State Nurses Association Conference Florence, Alabama

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vance, D. E., Wadley, V. G., Crowe, M. G., Raper, J. L., & Ball, K. K.
Affiliations
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Venue
Clinical Gerontologist
Published
2011-10
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
413-426
ISSN
  • 0731-7115 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2301
OpenAlex
W2113937484
Cited by
47
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG022838)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P30AI027767)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › HIV Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › HIV-related health complications and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
HIV, aging with HIV, cognitive performance, instrumental activities of daily living, cognitive decline, independent living, older adults, young adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review